Moderators: richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
phugoid1982 wrote:I'll refrain from judgment if it's Lufthansa but can someone explain to me what does St. Louis (post TWA connectivity) have to offer economically apart from Wash U that could justify decent yields if it's capturing biotech traffic? It's not exactly the booming Charlotte metro area. The last time I flew through there was from Champaign to STL on a jetstream probably 20 years ago.
phugoid1982 wrote:I'll refrain from judgment if it's Lufthansa but can someone explain to me what does St. Louis (post TWA connectivity) have to offer economically apart from Wash U that could justify decent yields if it's capturing biotech traffic? It's not exactly the booming Charlotte metro area. The last time I flew through there was from Champaign to STL on a jetstream probably 20 years ago.
Jshank83 wrote:I am 99% sure its LH. With 1% being UA flies it for now since they have 787-8s. But they have been targeting LH heavily for the last couple years. Bayer having their NA headquarters here now helped bring their money to the table I am sure.
No one is going to say legacy and mean Condor or Eurowings.
BA744PHX wrote:Jshank83 wrote:I am 99% sure its LH. With 1% being UA flies it for now since they have 787-8s. But they have been targeting LH heavily for the last couple years. Bayer having their NA headquarters here now helped bring their money to the table I am sure.
No one is going to say legacy and mean Condor or Eurowings.
Your on the assumption the individual who posted this on twitter knows what a legacy carrier is.
Also UA will never fly this route, it would be nice if its LH, but I'm also leaning towards Condor or Eurowings
PhilMcCrackin wrote:Lufthansa doesn't make much sense considering there are bigger and better dots to connect in the US that don't have LH service and they don't have a small enough aircraft with the range to open a marginal destination like STL.
My guess is DL or Condor.
PhilMcCrackin wrote:Lufthansa doesn't make much sense considering there are bigger and better dots to connect in the US that don't have LH service and they don't have a small enough aircraft with the range to open a marginal destination like STL.
My guess is DL or Condor.
PhilMcCrackin wrote:Lufthansa doesn't make much sense considering there are bigger and better dots to connect in the US that don't have LH service and they don't have a small enough aircraft with the range to open a marginal destination like STL.
DeltaRules wrote:This could be said for many of the point-to-point TATL flights that popped up prior to COVID, though, especially from DL and BA. Who ever saw PIT, IND, BNA, CHS, MSY, et al gaining nonstops to Europe?
DeltaRules wrote:PhilMcCrackin wrote:Lufthansa doesn't make much sense considering there are bigger and better dots to connect in the US that don't have LH service and they don't have a small enough aircraft with the range to open a marginal destination like STL.
This could be said for many of the point-to-point TATL flights that popped up prior to COVID, though, especially from DL and BA. Who ever saw PIT, IND, BNA, CHS, MSY, et al gaining nonstops to Europe?
Money (dangled by local governments and companies) talks.
ANA787 wrote:
Didn't STL at one time have service to Iceland?
MIflyer12 wrote:DeltaRules wrote:This could be said for many of the point-to-point TATL flights that popped up prior to COVID, though, especially from DL and BA. Who ever saw PIT, IND, BNA, CHS, MSY, et al gaining nonstops to Europe?
London is - overwhelmingly - the most popular European destination for Americans. FRA isn't even close.
Germans visiting St Louis are going to wonder why they bothered before they end the 2nd day of their visit.
PhilMcCrackin wrote:DeltaRules wrote:PhilMcCrackin wrote:Lufthansa doesn't make much sense considering there are bigger and better dots to connect in the US that don't have LH service and they don't have a small enough aircraft with the range to open a marginal destination like STL.
This could be said for many of the point-to-point TATL flights that popped up prior to COVID, though, especially from DL and BA. Who ever saw PIT, IND, BNA, CHS, MSY, et al gaining nonstops to Europe?
Money (dangled by local governments and companies) talks.
Right, I could believe BA because that's their MO as of late and they have the perfect aircraft for it in the 787-8, but not LH. My money is on DL given the PIT and IND routes they started.
floridaflyboy wrote:PhilMcCrackin wrote:DeltaRules wrote:
This could be said for many of the point-to-point TATL flights that popped up prior to COVID, though, especially from DL and BA. Who ever saw PIT, IND, BNA, CHS, MSY, et al gaining nonstops to Europe?
Money (dangled by local governments and companies) talks.
Right, I could believe BA because that's their MO as of late and they have the perfect aircraft for it in the 787-8, but not LH. My money is on DL given the PIT and IND routes they started.
There's essentially zero chance of Delta serving Germany from St. Louis. They don't even serve FRA from all their hubs, let alone point-to-point. Plus, those PIT and IND routes you mention are gone. DL has cut most of their international point-to-point.
TWFlyGuy wrote:I'd be surprised if Bayer is much of a factor. They didn't add flights from KC when their HQ was there. They didn't add service to RDU when it was their HQ.
ANA787 wrote:Didn't STL at one time have service to Iceland?
STLflyer wrote:ANA787 wrote:Didn't STL at one time have service to Iceland?
Yeah, on WOW. I was on the inaugural flight.
PhilMcCrackin wrote:floridaflyboy wrote:PhilMcCrackin wrote:
Right, I could believe BA because that's their MO as of late and they have the perfect aircraft for it in the 787-8, but not LH. My money is on DL given the PIT and IND routes they started.
There's essentially zero chance of Delta serving Germany from St. Louis. They don't even serve FRA from all their hubs, let alone point-to-point. Plus, those PIT and IND routes you mention are gone. DL has cut most of their international point-to-point.
It makes more sense than Lufthansa does. LH doesn't fly to marginal US destinations and there are much better US destinations available that don't have LH service.
lesfalls wrote:STLflyer wrote:ANA787 wrote:Didn't STL at one time have service to Iceland?
Yeah, on WOW. I was on the inaugural flight.
How full was it and any EU originating traffic?
Jshank83 wrote:I am 99% sure its LH. With 1% being UA flies it for now since they have 787-8s. But they have been targeting LH heavily for the last couple years. Bayer having their NA headquarters here now helped bring their money to the table I am sure.
No one is going to say legacy and mean Condor or Eurowings.
cityshuttle wrote:Just speculation - but since LH‘s smallest WB would be A 333, could we see OS with B 767 operate this route (maybe even to DUS) on behalf on LH ?
On the other hand, depending on frequency e.g. 3/7 or 4/7, maybe it is DE and they rotate this route along with their leisure routes ex DUS on B 757 or B 767.
inlikepitt wrote:TWFlyGuy wrote:I'd be surprised if Bayer is much of a factor. They didn't add flights from KC when their HQ was there. They didn't add service to RDU when it was their HQ.
Bayer Corp. never had their headquarters in KC or Raleigh. US operations were based in Pittsburgh until the Company realigned their business operations and moved US ops to New Jersey. There was always a fair amount of PIT-Frankfurt traffic back in the day when US Airways operated daily service.
BWIAirport wrote:Wonder how strict of a term "legacy carrier" is here.
DeltaRules wrote:This could be said for many of the point-to-point TATL flights that popped up prior to COVID, though, especially from DL and BA. Who ever saw PIT, IND, BNA, CHS, MSY, et al gaining nonstops to Europe?
LAX772LR wrote:DeltaRules wrote:This could be said for many of the point-to-point TATL flights that popped up prior to COVID, though, especially from DL and BA. Who ever saw PIT, IND, BNA, CHS, MSY, et al gaining nonstops to Europe?
Ignorance of history to place MSY, BNA, PIT among the likes of CHS; as all of them had gained/sustained TATL traffic in the past, prior to BA and others' recent expansions.
Particularly MSY, which has had nonstops to most of Europe's largest hubs, and for whom BA in 2017 was a resumption.
floridaflyboy wrote:PhilMcCrackin wrote:floridaflyboy wrote:
There's essentially zero chance of Delta serving Germany from St. Louis. They don't even serve FRA from all their hubs, let alone point-to-point. Plus, those PIT and IND routes you mention are gone. DL has cut most of their international point-to-point.
It makes more sense than Lufthansa does. LH doesn't fly to marginal US destinations and there are much better US destinations available that don't have LH service.
No, no it doesn't. Again, Delta does not fly from Germany to all of its hubs even, let alone point-to-point flying. LH on the other hand does serve cities in the US that are not partner hubs.
PhilMcCrackin wrote:floridaflyboy wrote:PhilMcCrackin wrote:
It makes more sense than Lufthansa does. LH doesn't fly to marginal US destinations and there are much better US destinations available that don't have LH service.
No, no it doesn't. Again, Delta does not fly from Germany to all of its hubs even, let alone point-to-point flying. LH on the other hand does serve cities in the US that are not partner hubs.
Phoenix, San Diego, Las Vegas, Portland, Nashville, New Orleans are all more deserving of an international flight on LH mainline than STL is which is why this doesn't make much sense to me. The smallest widebody LH has is the A333 which seems to be a sub-optimal aircraft to start a flight with.
If this really is Lufthansa, my money is on it actually being Eurowings Discover.