Moderators: jsumali2, richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
audidudi wrote:Firat movement for 12 January 2022:
MSN 2003 Starlux Airlines F-WWCN/B-58301, second test flight at TLS:
https://aibfamily.flights/A330/2003
MEA-707 wrote:I was surprised to see MSN 2007 (F-WWCL) also being for the French Air Force. The MRTTs have their own Line numbers, does anyone know what number/registration it will be?
The problem: MRTT047/F-UJCM is MSN 1998, MRTT048/F-UJCN is MSN 2008, MRTT049/F-UJCO is MSN 2011. It can't be MRTT050 because that one is used already for the Korean Air Force.
PM wrote:MEA-707 wrote:I was surprised to see MSN 2007 (F-WWCL) also being for the French Air Force. The MRTTs have their own Line numbers, does anyone know what number/registration it will be?
The problem: MRTT047/F-UJCM is MSN 1998, MRTT048/F-UJCN is MSN 2008, MRTT049/F-UJCO is MSN 2011. It can't be MRTT050 because that one is used already for the Korean Air Force.
The MRTTs have their own Line numbers?
I'm not sure that's correct. I may be wrong, but I assumed the 041, 042 and so on used my the Armée de l'Air was just their own way of identifying planes. The ROKAF use 18-001, 19-002, 19-003, 19-004.
scbriml wrote:PM wrote:MEA-707 wrote:I was surprised to see MSN 2007 (F-WWCL) also being for the French Air Force. The MRTTs have their own Line numbers, does anyone know what number/registration it will be?
The problem: MRTT047/F-UJCM is MSN 1998, MRTT048/F-UJCN is MSN 2008, MRTT049/F-UJCO is MSN 2011. It can't be MRTT050 because that one is used already for the Korean Air Force.
The MRTTs have their own Line numbers?
I'm not sure that's correct. I may be wrong, but I assumed the 041, 042 and so on used my the Armée de l'Air was just their own way of identifying planes. The ROKAF use 18-001, 19-002, 19-003, 19-004.
Yes, the MRTTs have standard Airbus A330 construction numbers, but the are also assigned an "MRTT conversion serial number". The French Air Force uses the latter for the plane's registration once in service. So, FAF 041 is A330 c/n 1735 and MRTT041 (i.e. the 41st MRTT conversion).
I saw c/n 2007 when I visited TLS back in October. It was outside, but unpainted, so presumably fairly recently off the production line.
MEA-707 wrote:scbriml wrote:PM wrote:The MRTTs have their own Line numbers?
I'm not sure that's correct. I may be wrong, but I assumed the 041, 042 and so on used my the Armée de l'Air was just their own way of identifying planes. The ROKAF use 18-001, 19-002, 19-003, 19-004.
Yes, the MRTTs have standard Airbus A330 construction numbers, but the are also assigned an "MRTT conversion serial number". The French Air Force uses the latter for the plane's registration once in service. So, FAF 041 is A330 c/n 1735 and MRTT041 (i.e. the 41st MRTT conversion).
I saw c/n 2007 when I visited TLS back in October. It was outside, but unpainted, so presumably fairly recently off the production line.
Thanks for clarifying, Scbriml ! But one small correction, MRTT041 was not (necissairily) the 41st conversion. Comparible to Boeings MSN's they allocated blocks way in advance. That means they worked recently on MRTT049 for the French and MRTT060 for the Netherlands at the same time. MRTT050-053 were for Korea, 054-060 for the Netherlands. So perhaps 061-063 are for the French again.
MEA-707 wrote:they are mentioned on http://www.airlinerlist.com and http://www.planespotters.net
MEA-707 wrote:But one small correction, MRTT041 was not (necissairily) the 41st conversion. Comparible to Boeings MSN's they allocated blocks way in advance.
scbriml wrote:PM wrote:I'm not sure that's correct. I may be wrong, but I assumed the 041, 042 and so on used my the Armée de l'Air was just their own way of identifying planes. The ROKAF use 18-001, 19-002, 19-003, 19-004.
Yes, the MRTTs have standard Airbus A330 construction numbers, but the are also assigned an "MRTT conversion serial number". The French Air Force uses the latter for the plane's registration once in service. So, FAF 041 is A330 c/n 1735 and MRTT041 (i.e. the 41st MRTT conversion).
I saw c/n 2007 when I visited TLS back in October. It was outside, but unpainted, so presumably fairly recently off the production line.
papatango wrote:Have any of the AirAsia 330neos been delivered?
Polot wrote:papatango wrote:Have any of the AirAsia 330neos been delivered?
None, at least to AirAsia. The two A330neos AirAsia X operated were from lessors and not their direct order.
audidudi wrote:Latest movement for 14 January 2022:
MSN 1952 A339 AZUL Linhas Aereas Brasileiras F-WWYO/PR-ANV, eleventh test and first customer acceptance flight at TLS (this frame was Delivered on Contract on 18 December 2020!):
https://aibfamily.flights/A330/1952
Aircellist wrote:audidudi wrote:Latest movement for 14 January 2022:
MSN 1952 A339 AZUL Linhas Aereas Brasileiras F-WWYO/PR-ANV, eleventh test and first customer acceptance flight at TLS (this frame was Delivered on Contract on 18 December 2020!):
https://aibfamily.flights/A330/1952
I believe it is the first time I read in your reports (or everywhere else, to be honest) that an airplane is delivered, even only "on contract", before customer acceptance flights! How come?
audidudi wrote:Aircellist wrote:audidudi wrote:Latest movement for 14 January 2022:
MSN 1952 A339 AZUL Linhas Aereas Brasileiras F-WWYO/PR-ANV, eleventh test and first customer acceptance flight at TLS (this frame was Delivered on Contract on 18 December 2020!):
https://aibfamily.flights/A330/1952
I believe it is the first time I read in your reports (or everywhere else, to be honest) that an airplane is delivered, even only "on contract", before customer acceptance flights! How come?
I agree. I don't know any details of what happened with this frame. Planespotters.net also confirms the "Delivered on Contract" date.
oldJoe wrote:audidudi wrote:Aircellist wrote:
I believe it is the first time I read in your reports (or everywhere else, to be honest) that an airplane is delivered, even only "on contract", before customer acceptance flights! How come?
I agree. I don't know any details of what happened with this frame. Planespotters.net also confirms the "Delivered on Contract" date.
This bird was delivered on contract to Avolon over a year ago and not direct to Azul and went into storage. If Azul want to accept the aircraft now of course they will check it and thus the CAF I guess
audidudi wrote:oldJoe wrote:audidudi wrote:I agree. I don't know any details of what happened with this frame. Planespotters.net also confirms the "Delivered on Contract" date.
This bird was delivered on contract to Avolon over a year ago and not direct to Azul and went into storage. If Azul want to accept the aircraft now of course they will check it and thus the CAF I guess
And while in storage at CHR, she did two test flights, then ferried back to TLS, did one test flight at TLS, then ferried back to CHR, then ferried back to TLS, all in the last 12 months.
JerseyFlyer wrote:Is MSN 2005 a -900 or -800?
mjoelnir wrote:JerseyFlyer wrote:Is MSN 2005 a -900 or -800?
MSN 2005 is actually an A330-800. Kuwait Airways has no A330-900 on order.
audidudi wrote:MSN 2005 Kuwait Airways A338 F-WWKU/9K-APH, nineteenth test flight at TLS (probably a record for test flights!):
https://aibfamily.flights/A330/2005
bspc wrote:audidudi wrote:MSN 2005 Kuwait Airways A338 F-WWKU/9K-APH, nineteenth test flight at TLS (probably a record for test flights!):
https://aibfamily.flights/A330/2005
I always thought that MSN 2005 was actually some sort of test aircraft prior to delivery, no?
PM wrote:I don't know if I'm being excessively pedantic (probably) but we don't really use the term "prototype" any more, do we? Back in the day, a prototype bore quite a resemblance to what eventually went into production but was significantly distinct.
Think the BAe EAP.
https://www.google.com.na/search?q=bae+ ... q0ao2Kt7AM
For a few decades now, the first version of a commercial airliner to fly has been more or less the finished version.
For example, the first ever 777 to fly later entered service with Cathay Pacific.
So, MSN 1888 may be the first A330-800 but I'd hardly call it a prototype.
audidudi wrote:And MSN 2005 had its twentieth test flight today!
Devilfish wrote:audidudi wrote:And MSN 2005 had its twentieth test flight today!
What's the issue with this frame? Might the unusually high number of test flights have anything to do with A338 certification requirements for the previously bruited 251T HGW version
bspc wrote:I'm pretty sure that is the case.
audidudi wrote:MSN 2005 Kuwait Airways A338 F-WWKU/9K-APH, twenty first test flight at TLS! (I really wonder what's going on here...I think you might be on to something "Devilfish" in reply #34!):
Devilfish wrote:audidudi wrote:MSN 2005 Kuwait Airways A338 F-WWKU/9K-APH, twenty first test flight at TLS! (I really wonder what's going on here...I think you might be on to something "Devilfish" in reply #34!):
If I were, Airbus is (major problem aside) being overly meticulous with it. KU doesn't strike me as an airline who would want an A338 with that much uplift capacity or range. So I'm very curious who the first batch of certified 251T frames would be for?
audidudi wrote:MSN 2005 Kuwait Airways A338 F-WWKU/9K-APH, twenty second test flight at TLS, (and they continue!):
audidudi wrote:Latest movements for 1 February 2022:
MSN 2005 Kuwait Airways A338 F-WWKU/9K-APH, twenty third test flight at TLS:
https://aibfamily.flights/A330/2005
Breathe wrote:I don't think Airbus are testing this plane enough.
Breathe wrote:audidudi wrote:Latest movements for 1 February 2022:
MSN 2005 Kuwait Airways A338 F-WWKU/9K-APH, twenty third test flight at TLS:
https://aibfamily.flights/A330/2005
I don't think Airbus are testing this plane enough.
Devilfish wrote:Breathe wrote:I don't think Airbus are testing this plane enough.
I'm beginning to wonder if Airbus were pitching it for a major freighter tender...or even more shocking - partnering with LM and RR to substitute the type for the tanker competition...
Breathe wrote:LM - Loganair?!