Moderators: richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
Philippine747 wrote:MNL-AKL v.v. not listed.
Philippine747 wrote:MNL-TLV v.v. not listed.
Philippine747 wrote:MNL-LHR v.v. no further service listings.
Devilfish wrote:Doubtless their FA's sarong kebayas would have been more stunning were the photo taken inside with a more rustic backdrop.....
https://www.skyscrapercity.com/cdn-cgi/ ... g.3003346/
Devilfish wrote:Wonder if 1251, the government's G280, would make an appearance there again?
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/ ... m_G280.jpg
AB330 wrote:Unlikely unless Pduz decided to make a surprised visit. The G280 will probably be keep close to him in case of a crisis or emergency. Like Villamor Air Base at MNL.
AB330 wrote:SMC recently donated a single Beechcraft Hawker 400XP to the Philippine Air Force (PAF) it was acquired in 2002 by SMC. Its expected to be assigned to the 250th Presidential Airlift Wing and likely used to transport military officers, cabinet secretaries and possibly as a back-up to the Gulfstream G280.
Devilfish wrote:AB330 wrote:Unlikely unless Pduz decided to make a surprised visit. The G280 will probably be keep close to him in case of a crisis or emergency. Like Villamor Air Base at MNL.
Given how the election results are trending, the G280 would likely be pre-positioned at LAO to take the president-elect (if he's not in MM yet) to Villamor AB for his oath taking in Malacanang. Might 1251 then receive the Philippine flag and the red stripe below the blue field as he's fond of wearing?[/b][/i]
AB330 wrote:Well BBM Headquarters is in Manila so I don't think they will need to send the G280 to Laoag (LAO) yet
AB330 wrote:Funny that 3507 is painted exclusively white almost like LH know they won't be keeping them for long?
Devilfish wrote:AB330 wrote:Funny that 3507 is painted exclusively white almost like LH know they won't be keeping them for long?
It's a special livery. What made you say LH wouldn't be keeping the A359 for long
toga998 wrote:I've noticed UPS has its 767's doing stops in CRK from SZX and NRT. Is this COVID-restriction related or is there actual demand to/from CRK?
Brianpr3 wrote:Does president bbm support the new airport project?
Philippine747 wrote:MNL-TAG v.v. now 3x daily from 17 May-12 June. Returns to 2x daily after that date.
MNL-BSO v.v. 3x weekly from 20 May-UFN.
Philippine747 wrote:PAL has released their latest timetable update, effective 18 May 2022:
International
MNL-DPS v.v. service resumption plans changed. Service resumes 1 June, 3x weekly instead of 5x weekly. Additional service increases on 1 Aug to 5x weekly, 1x daily by 4 October
MNL-HNL v.v. 4x weekly from 2 June. Extra flight on 4 June
MNL-MFM v.v. service resumption postponed to 1 August
MNL-JFK v.v. service increase to 4x weekly from 4 June-27 August, returns to 3x after. YVR stop on return extended to June 30.
MNL-KIX v.v. service increase postponed to 2 July
MNL-POM v.v. service resumption postponed to 2 July
MNL-SFO v.v. extra 1x weekly flight from 3 Jul-14 Aug on top of 1x daily service
MNL-ICN v.v. scheduled 3x weekly from 3-28 June
MNL-SIN v.v. 1 extra flight on 28 May
YYZ-MNL stop in YVR extended to 29 June
CEB-NRT v.v. operates on 4 and 18 June complementing planned regular service resumption on 1 June.
Domestic
MNL-CEB v.v. additional 2x daily service from 1 June, bringing it to 10x daily
MNL-COT v.v. returns to 11x weekly from 2 June
MNL-DGT v.v. increases to 3x daily from 13 June
MNL-ILO v.v. Mainline service taken over by PALex from 15 June
MNL-LAO v.v. 1 weekly service to be opb Mainline from 17 June. Remaining flights opb PALex
MNL-LGP v.v. 4x daily except for 1-12 June (3x daily on those dates)
MNL-TAG v.v. additional 2x weekly service from 17 June
MNL-TAC v.v. additional 2x weekly PALex service from 17 June-UFN. Complements 3x daily Mainline service
CEB-BXU v.v. increases to 11x weekly from 3 June
CEB-CGY v.v. increases to 2x daily from 1 June
CEB-CRK v.v. increases to 4x weekly from 16 June
CEB-DVO v.v. 2x daily from 1 June. PR2364 departs DVO on diff times on We/Su
CEB-ILO v.v. 10x weekly from 14 June
AB330 wrote:Philippine747 wrote:PAL has released their latest timetable update, effective 18 May 2022:
International
MNL-DPS v.v. service resumption plans changed. Service resumes 1 June, 3x weekly instead of 5x weekly. Additional service increases on 1 Aug to 5x weekly, 1x daily by 4 October
MNL-HNL v.v. 4x weekly from 2 June. Extra flight on 4 June
MNL-MFM v.v. service resumption postponed to 1 August
MNL-JFK v.v. service increase to 4x weekly from 4 June-27 August, returns to 3x after. YVR stop on return extended to June 30.
MNL-KIX v.v. service increase postponed to 2 July
MNL-POM v.v. service resumption postponed to 2 July
MNL-SFO v.v. extra 1x weekly flight from 3 Jul-14 Aug on top of 1x daily service
MNL-ICN v.v. scheduled 3x weekly from 3-28 June
MNL-SIN v.v. 1 extra flight on 28 May
YYZ-MNL stop in YVR extended to 29 June
CEB-NRT v.v. operates on 4 and 18 June complementing planned regular service resumption on 1 June.
Domestic
MNL-CEB v.v. additional 2x daily service from 1 June, bringing it to 10x daily
MNL-COT v.v. returns to 11x weekly from 2 June
MNL-DGT v.v. increases to 3x daily from 13 June
MNL-ILO v.v. Mainline service taken over by PALex from 15 June
MNL-LAO v.v. 1 weekly service to be opb Mainline from 17 June. Remaining flights opb PALex
MNL-LGP v.v. 4x daily except for 1-12 June (3x daily on those dates)
MNL-TAG v.v. additional 2x weekly service from 17 June
MNL-TAC v.v. additional 2x weekly PALex service from 17 June-UFN. Complements 3x daily Mainline service
CEB-BXU v.v. increases to 11x weekly from 3 June
CEB-CGY v.v. increases to 2x daily from 1 June
CEB-CRK v.v. increases to 4x weekly from 16 June
CEB-DVO v.v. 2x daily from 1 June. PR2364 departs DVO on diff times on We/Su
CEB-ILO v.v. 10x weekly from 14 June
PAL is slowly re-opening its CEB hub I wonder if some routes will be returned or permanently removed from the network?
Philippine747 wrote:Some things I forgot to add to the timetable update in reply #141...
MNL-LAX (PR112) stops via ICN from 25-27 May. LAX-MNL (PR113) stops in HNL on return. FlightRadar is showing A330 operating instead of 777.
Philippine747 wrote:MNL-LAX (PR112) stops via ICN from 25-27 May. LAX-MNL (PR113) stops in HNL on return. FlightRadar is showing A330 operating instead of 777.
N667US wrote:Philippine747 wrote:MNL-LAX (PR112) stops via ICN from 25-27 May. LAX-MNL (PR113) stops in HNL on return. FlightRadar is showing A330 operating instead of 777.
I'm guessing this is related to RP-C7777 being in MNL since the 15th, with this flight specifically being mostly operated by either the A333 or A359 since then.
Philippine747 wrote:COT-TWT v.v. begins 9 June-UFN, opb PALex A320, 2x weekly every Mo-Thu. Flights are now open for booking on PAL's website.
AB330 wrote:I just got word that PAL has decided to suspended Re-configuring its A350 from an inside source. Its speculated that maybe Management have dedicated to keep PECY though it should be noted the original inquirer article with interview from the CFO did not specifically mention getting rid of PECY and rather the author of the article came that conclusion because it wasn't mentioned which could also be there still undecided on it at the time.
AB330 wrote:Regardless the suspension only covers the two A350 while the eight A330 and two A321 will still proceeded as planned.
Devilfish wrote:Philippine747 wrote:COT-TWT v.v. begins 9 June-UFN, opb PALex A320, 2x weekly every Mo-Thu. Flights are now open for booking on PAL's website.
Just to clarify, the A320 is for initial service only...it's costlier to operate and likely too much capacity for such a thin, short sector. Subsequent flights will be operated by Q400NGs.
http://philippineairspace.blogspot.com/ ... route.html
AB330 wrote:PAL Cargo revenue is quite impressive I wondernif soon they will require dedicated freighters?
AB330 wrote:For domestic I think either the A320 would be suitable as it can land in most domestic airport in the country for higher capacity I've heard that they are considering the A330-300 P2F though I suspect they will used older aircraft Pre-2005 as most above those would still be in-demand as airliner