Moderators: richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
SyracuseAvGeek wrote:SkyWest operates 38 EAS cities on behalf of UA, United operates two on their own (COD and PQI). This ending of 29 cities means they (UA/SkyWest) will be only left with 9 EAS cities (assuming PBG and OGS aren’t part of the 29 as they were previously announced).
I wonder why they aren’t cutting any of the EAS cities under the DL brand, there are 15 of them.
Gulfstream500 wrote:For reference, SkyWest currently operates to 50 cities as part of the EAS program. This means that over half of the EAS destinations are being pulled.
Sounds like some good opportunities for Contour will be available...
Chuska wrote:Gulfstream500 wrote:For reference, SkyWest currently operates to 50 cities as part of the EAS program. This means that over half of the EAS destinations are being pulled.
Sounds like some good opportunities for Contour will be available...
DIK is probably the discrepancy between 49 or 50 EAS cities. Anyone know why OO got the contract for DIK but CommutAir is flying it?
Pinto wrote:Can someone explain to me were the 29 comes from. I have yet to see anything regarding a mass change besides the changing of route into 1 stop flights.
Pinto wrote:Can someone explain to me were the 29 comes from. I have yet to see anything regarding a mass change besides the changing of route into 1 stop flights.
Gulfstream500 wrote:For reference, SkyWest currently operates to 50 cities as part of the EAS program. This means that over half of the EAS destinations are being pulled.
Sounds like some good opportunities for Contour will be available...
Rdh3e wrote:Chuska wrote:Gulfstream500 wrote:For reference, SkyWest currently operates to 50 cities as part of the EAS program. This means that over half of the EAS destinations are being pulled.
Sounds like some good opportunities for Contour will be available...
DIK is probably the discrepancy between 49 or 50 EAS cities. Anyone know why OO got the contract for DIK but CommutAir is flying it?
Because SkyWest did not get the contract for DIK, United did.
https://www.regulations.gov/document/DO ... 5-697-0127
FATFlyer wrote:Skywest has filed all of the 90 day intent to terminate service notices at regulations.gov.
The full list of 29 stations is:
Alamosa, CO – OST-1997-2960
Pueblo, CO – OST-1999-6589
Fort Dodge, IA – OST-2001-10682
Mason City, IA – OST-2001-10684
Sioux City, IA – OST-2006-23932
Dodge City, KS – OST-1998-3502
Hays, KS – OST-1998-3497
Liberal, KS – OST-1998-3498
Salina, KS – OST-2002-11376
Paducah, KY – OST-2009-0299
Decatur, IL – OST-2006-23929
Houghton, MI – OST-2009-0302
Muskegon, MI – OST-2009-0301
Cape Girardeau, MO – OST-1996-1559
Fort Leonard Wood, MO – OST-1996-1167
Joplin, MO – OST-2006-23932
Meridian, MS – OST-2008-0112
Hattiesburg, MS – OST-2001-10685
Devils Lake, ND – OST-1997-2785
Jamestown, ND – OST-1997-2785
Kearney, NE – OST-1996-1715
North Platte, NE – OST-1999-5173
Scottsbluff, NE – OST-2003-14535
Johnstown, PA – OST-2002-11451
Victoria, TX – OST-2005-20454
Shenandoah, VA – OST-2002-11378
Eau Claire, WI – OST-2009-0306
Clarksburg, WV – OST-2005-20736
Lewisburg, WV – OST-2003-15553
They used the same document for each filing with the full list in each. As a source for the above list here is Pueblo's filing:
https://downloads.regulations.gov/DOT-OST-1999-6589-0146/attachment_1.pdf
FATFlyer wrote:Skywest has filed all of the 90 day intent to terminate service notices at regulations.gov.
The full list of 29 stations is:
Alamosa, CO – OST-1997-2960
Pueblo, CO – OST-1999-6589
Fort Dodge, IA – OST-2001-10682
Mason City, IA – OST-2001-10684
Sioux City, IA – OST-2006-23932
Dodge City, KS – OST-1998-3502
Hays, KS – OST-1998-3497
Liberal, KS – OST-1998-3498
Salina, KS – OST-2002-11376
Paducah, KY – OST-2009-0299
Decatur, IL – OST-2006-23929
Houghton, MI – OST-2009-0302
Muskegon, MI – OST-2009-0301
Cape Girardeau, MO – OST-1996-1559
Fort Leonard Wood, MO – OST-1996-1167
Joplin, MO – OST-2006-23932
Meridian, MS – OST-2008-0112
Hattiesburg, MS – OST-2001-10685
Devils Lake, ND – OST-1997-2785
Jamestown, ND – OST-1997-2785
Kearney, NE – OST-1996-1715
North Platte, NE – OST-1999-51733
Scottsbluff, NE – OST-2003-14535
Johnstown, PA – OST-2002-11451
Victoria, TX – OST-2005-20454
Shenandoah, VA – OST-2002-11378
Eau Claire, WI – OST-2009-0306
Clarksburg, WV – OST-2005-20736
Lewisburg, WV – OST-2003-15553
They used the same document for each filing with the full list in each. As a source for the above list here is Pueblo's filing:
https://downloads.regulations.gov/DOT-OST-1999-6589-0146/attachment_1.pdf
FATFlyer wrote:Skywest has filed all of the 90 day intent to terminate service notices at regulations.gov.
The full list of 29 stations is:
Alamosa, CO – OST-1997-2960
Pueblo, CO – OST-1999-6589
Fort Dodge, IA – OST-2001-10682
Mason City, IA – OST-2001-10684
Sioux City, IA – OST-2006-23932
Dodge City, KS – OST-1998-3502
Hays, KS – OST-1998-3497
Liberal, KS – OST-1998-3498
Salina, KS – OST-2002-11376
Paducah, KY – OST-2009-0299
Decatur, IL – OST-2006-23929
Houghton, MI – OST-2009-0302
Muskegon, MI – OST-2009-0301
Cape Girardeau, MO – OST-1996-1559
Fort Leonard Wood, MO – OST-1996-1167
Joplin, MO – OST-2006-23932
Meridian, MS – OST-2008-0112
Hattiesburg, MS – OST-2001-10685
Devils Lake, ND – OST-1997-2785
Jamestown, ND – OST-1997-2785
Kearney, NE – OST-1996-1715
North Platte, NE – OST-1999-5173
Scottsbluff, NE – OST-2003-14535
Johnstown, PA – OST-2002-11451
Victoria, TX – OST-2005-20454
Shenandoah, VA – OST-2002-11378
Eau Claire, WI – OST-2009-0306
Clarksburg, WV – OST-2005-20736
Lewisburg, WV – OST-2003-15553
They used the same document for each filing with the full list in each. As a source for the above list here is Pueblo's filing:
https://downloads.regulations.gov/DOT-OST-1999-6589-0146/attachment_1.pdf
FATFlyer wrote:Skywest has filed all of the 90 day intent to terminate service notices at regulations.gov.
The full list of 29 stations is:
Alamosa, CO – OST-1997-2960
Pueblo, CO – OST-1999-6589
Fort Dodge, IA – OST-2001-10682
Mason City, IA – OST-2001-10684
Sioux City, IA – OST-2006-23932
Dodge City, KS – OST-1998-3502
Hays, KS – OST-1998-3497
Liberal, KS – OST-1998-3498
Salina, KS – OST-2002-11376
Paducah, KY – OST-2009-0299
Decatur, IL – OST-2006-23929
Houghton, MI – OST-2009-0302
Muskegon, MI – OST-2009-0301
Cape Girardeau, MO – OST-1996-1559
Fort Leonard Wood, MO – OST-1996-1167
Joplin, MO – OST-2006-23932
Meridian, MS – OST-2008-0112
Hattiesburg, MS – OST-2001-10685
Devils Lake, ND – OST-1997-2785
Jamestown, ND – OST-1997-2785
Kearney, NE – OST-1996-1715
North Platte, NE – OST-1999-5173
Scottsbluff, NE – OST-2003-14535
Johnstown, PA – OST-2002-11451
Victoria, TX – OST-2005-20454
Shenandoah, VA – OST-2002-11378
Eau Claire, WI – OST-2009-0306
Clarksburg, WV – OST-2005-20736
Lewisburg, WV – OST-2003-15553
They used the same document for each filing with the full list in each. As a source for the above list here is Pueblo's filing:
https://downloads.regulations.gov/DOT-OST-1999-6589-0146/attachment_1.pdf
JBo wrote:So here's a question: Can SkyWest file to terminate service at these cities, then rebid them with the reduced frequencies that they were originally asking the DOT for?
Like I wonder if this isn't a song-and-dance move with the DOT to get what they want since they couldn't just reduce their schedules on their current contracts.
That being said: if SkyWest is pulling the plug entirely on these routes, there isn't a whole lot of opportunity for any of these other communities - especially since none of the other "branded" regionals are pursuing EAS contracts.
knope2001 wrote:I come up with Laramie, Vernal, Moab, Prescott as the only United EAS markets left off the termination list. Anybody think of any I'm missing?
Some of the top performers like JLN, CMX, SUX are on here. Prescott has done great but CNY, VEL and LAR are not superstars. And I'm sure it's not coincidence that zero DL* stations are on the list. I don't know the actual reason why but I'd guess it's probably something in the contracted relationship. DL* has some pretty strong performers like ABR, RHI, BJI, BTM but some like INL and APN are not especially strong.
knope2001 wrote:I come up with Laramie, Vernal, Moab, Prescott as the only United EAS markets left off the termination list. Anybody think of any I'm missing?
Some of the top performers like JLN, CMX, SUX are on here. Prescott has done great but CNY, VEL and LAR are not superstars. And I'm sure it's not coincidence that zero DL* stations are on the list. I don't know the actual reason why but I'd guess it's probably something in the contracted relationship. DL* has some pretty strong performers like ABR, RHI, BJI, BTM but some like INL and APN are not especially strong.
FATFlyer wrote:Skywest has filed all of the 90 day intent to terminate service notices at regulations.gov.
The full list of 29 stations is:
Alamosa, CO – OST-1997-2960
Pueblo, CO – OST-1999-6589
Fort Dodge, IA – OST-2001-10682
Mason City, IA – OST-2001-10684
Sioux City, IA – OST-2006-23932
Dodge City, KS – OST-1998-3502
Hays, KS – OST-1998-3497
Liberal, KS – OST-1998-3498
Salina, KS – OST-2002-11376
Paducah, KY – OST-2009-0299
Decatur, IL – OST-2006-23929
Houghton, MI – OST-2009-0302
Muskegon, MI – OST-2009-0301
Cape Girardeau, MO – OST-1996-1559
Fort Leonard Wood, MO – OST-1996-1167
Joplin, MO – OST-2006-23932
Meridian, MS – OST-2008-0112
Hattiesburg, MS – OST-2001-10685
Devils Lake, ND – OST-1997-2785
Jamestown, ND – OST-1997-2785
Kearney, NE – OST-1996-1715
North Platte, NE – OST-1999-5173
Scottsbluff, NE – OST-2003-14535
Johnstown, PA – OST-2002-11451
Victoria, TX – OST-2005-20454
Shenandoah, VA – OST-2002-11378
Eau Claire, WI – OST-2009-0306
Clarksburg, WV – OST-2005-20736
Lewisburg, WV – OST-2003-15553
They used the same document for each filing with the full list in each. As a source for the above list here is Pueblo's filing:
https://downloads.regulations.gov/DOT-OST-1999-6589-0146/attachment_1.pdf
Jshank83 wrote:TBN just switched to SkyWest and basically badmouthed cape in their bid. My how those tables have turned.
FATFlyer wrote:Skywest has filed all of the 90 day intent to terminate service notices at regulations.gov.
The full list of 29 stations is:
Houghton, MI – OST-2009-0302
Muskegon, MI – OST-2009-0301
They used the same document for each filing with the full list in each. As a source for the above list here is Pueblo's filing:
https://downloads.regulations.gov/DOT-OST-1999-6589-0146/attachment_1.pdf
MIflyer12 wrote:FATFlyer wrote:Skywest has filed all of the 90 day intent to terminate service notices at regulations.gov.
The full list of 29 stations is:
Alamosa, CO – OST-1997-2960
Pueblo, CO – OST-1999-6589
Fort Dodge, IA – OST-2001-10682
Mason City, IA – OST-2001-10684
Sioux City, IA – OST-2006-23932
Dodge City, KS – OST-1998-3502
Hays, KS – OST-1998-3497
Liberal, KS – OST-1998-3498
Salina, KS – OST-2002-11376
Paducah, KY – OST-2009-0299
Decatur, IL – OST-2006-23929
Houghton, MI – OST-2009-0302
Muskegon, MI – OST-2009-0301
Cape Girardeau, MO – OST-1996-1559
Fort Leonard Wood, MO – OST-1996-1167
Joplin, MO – OST-2006-23932
Meridian, MS – OST-2008-0112
Hattiesburg, MS – OST-2001-10685
Devils Lake, ND – OST-1997-2785
Jamestown, ND – OST-1997-2785
Kearney, NE – OST-1996-1715
North Platte, NE – OST-1999-5173
Scottsbluff, NE – OST-2003-14535
Johnstown, PA – OST-2002-11451
Victoria, TX – OST-2005-20454
Shenandoah, VA – OST-2002-11378
Eau Claire, WI – OST-2009-0306
Clarksburg, WV – OST-2005-20736
Lewisburg, WV – OST-2003-15553
They used the same document for each filing with the full list in each. As a source for the above list here is Pueblo's filing:
https://downloads.regulations.gov/DOT-OST-1999-6589-0146/attachment_1.pdf
That's airports in 15 states. Thirty senators. Not gonna happen.
Gulfstream500 wrote:Jshank83 wrote:TBN just switched to SkyWest and basically badmouthed cape in their bid. My how those tables have turned.
I wonder if they'll go back to Contour, or maybe ACO?
FlyingElvii wrote:I can easily see Skywest being forced to continue services. There is just no replacement services available, because Skywest decimated the other EAS carriers by jumping into all of these markets for cash flow after March 2020.
CIDFlyer wrote:Wow that’s too bad. PAH was even building a new terminal too I thought? Or renovating the current one. I’ve always thought Maybe they’d be better off to CLT or DFW on AAeagle
bucky707 wrote:FlyingElvii wrote:I can easily see Skywest being forced to continue services. There is just no replacement services available, because Skywest decimated the other EAS carriers by jumping into all of these markets for cash flow after March 2020.
How do you force an airline to continue service when they don’t have the staff to do it?
MIflyer12 wrote:bucky707 wrote:FlyingElvii wrote:I can easily see Skywest being forced to continue services. There is just no replacement services available, because Skywest decimated the other EAS carriers by jumping into all of these markets for cash flow after March 2020.
How do you force an airline to continue service when they don’t have the staff to do it?
They can cut non-EAS markets.
Seat1F wrote:FATFlyer wrote:Skywest has filed all of the 90 day intent to terminate service notices at regulations.gov.
The full list of 29 stations is:
Houghton, MI – OST-2009-0302
Muskegon, MI – OST-2009-0301
They used the same document for each filing with the full list in each. As a source for the above list here is Pueblo's filing:
https://downloads.regulations.gov/DOT-OST-1999-6589-0146/attachment_1.pdf
As far as the two affected airports in my home state of Michigan, My opinion is as follows:
1. Driving from downtown Muskegon to GRR takes just under an hour. There are plenty flights leaving from GRR to many US destinations. This one is a no brainer. Taxpayers should not be paying to subsidize flights into MKG when Muskegon residents have very good flight options from GRR only 55 minutes away.
2. Driving from downtown Houghton to SAW takes approximately two hours. I still do not consider this a hardship case.
The current pilot shortage at regional carriers is a great chance to kill off many of these unnecessary EAS markets. I know others will disagree, but in my book, less than a 2.5-3 hour drive to a viable airport alternative does not constitute hardship.
Chuska wrote:JLN, SUX, and even EAR have or have recently had extra service above EAS requirements. They must be strong.
bucky707 wrote:FlyingElvii wrote:I can easily see Skywest being forced to continue services. There is just no replacement services available, because Skywest decimated the other EAS carriers by jumping into all of these markets for cash flow after March 2020.
How do you force an airline to continue service when they don’t have the staff to do it?
southwest1675 wrote:I'm out of the loop. What's up with these cuts? No pilots?
Rdh3e wrote:Chuska wrote:Gulfstream500 wrote:For reference, SkyWest currently operates to 50 cities as part of the EAS program. This means that over half of the EAS destinations are being pulled.
Sounds like some good opportunities for Contour will be available...
DIK is probably the discrepancy between 49 or 50 EAS cities. Anyone know why OO got the contract for DIK but CommutAir is flying it?
Because SkyWest did not get the contract for DIK, United did.
https://www.regulations.gov/document/DO ... 5-697-0127