Moderators: richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
Opus99 wrote:Bloomberg reporting it’s either going to be NEOs, MAX or a mix.
MDC862 wrote:350s, A320s, 737-Max...where is AI getting billions to make this a reality or is this fantasyland? Cheap money is no longer available with a world-wide recession looming.
LAX772LR wrote:Opus99 wrote:Bloomberg reporting it’s either going to be NEOs, MAX or a mix.
Bummer, if that means no A220s... would've love to have seen those in AI's livery.
That, and less chance of a MAX order, had they been chosen, as well.
portola2727 wrote:I wonder if the airports in India could expand as much as AI is looking to expand. I know Chennai(my home airport in India) is very much constrained at the moment and I wonder if AI could expand further at the airport.
portola2727 wrote:I wonder if the airports in India could expand as much as AI is looking to expand. I know Chennai(my home airport in India) is very much constrained at the moment and I wonder if AI could expand further at the airport.
T4thH wrote:The A320 is sold out till 2025 and more or less virtually sold out till 2028?
They will just not be able to order 300x A320 family jets as there are no slots available, they will have to buy the MAX.
FluidFlow wrote:I guess it will be a combination of 8200s and A321(XLRs), possibly a 60/40 split towards the 737s.
avier wrote:FluidFlow wrote:I guess it will be a combination of 8200s and A321(XLRs), possibly a 60/40 split towards the 737s.
737-8200 MAX only makes sense if it in all Y cabin, that would work for their LCC arm. Otherwise, for an FSC in dual cabin layout, I wonder what propose does it serve.
Polot wrote:Air India Express might be interested in some 8200s. Not sure what the long term vision/plan is for that airline though under the new ownership.
T4thH wrote:The A320 is sold out till 2025 and more or less virtually sold out till 2028?
They will just not be able to order 300x A320 family jets as there are no slots available, they will have to buy the MAX.
JerseyFlyer wrote:Some might find a happy home in AirAsia India.
"Antitrust regulator the Competition Commission of India (CCI) said on June 14 that it “approves the acquisition of the entire shareholding in AirAsia India by Air India.”
https://www.ch-aviation.com/portal/news ... asia-india
T4thH wrote:The A320 is sold out till 2025 and more or less virtually sold out till 2028?
They will just not be able to order 300x A320 family jets as there are no slots available, they will have to buy the MAX.
avier wrote:AirAsia India brand will disappear and will be integrated into either IX or AI, as AirAsia Bhd pulls out entire stake. Unless, Tata group are willing to pay royalty to Air Asia for the brand.
DCA350 wrote:Wow, that's a lot of capacity coming online.. If I'm not mistaken Indigo has over 500 NEOs on the way. Plus a few other domestic carriers as competition.
lightsaber wrote:DCA350 wrote:It wouldn't surprise me to see a split MAX/NEO order.
Lightsaber
lightsaber wrote:DCA350 wrote:Wow, that's a lot of capacity coming online.. If I'm not mistaken Indigo has over 500 NEOs on the way. Plus a few other domestic carriers as competition.
This order is huge. Combined with Indigo, it will make it tough for smaller Indian airlines.
For this size of order, assuming it is over a decade of deliveries, both companies will make slots available.
It wouldn't surprise me to see a split MAX/NEO order. It would be a pleasant surprise to see the A220 added.
Lightsaber
avier wrote:JerseyFlyer wrote:Some might find a happy home in AirAsia India.
"Antitrust regulator the Competition Commission of India (CCI) said on June 14 that it “approves the acquisition of the entire shareholding in AirAsia India by Air India.”
https://www.ch-aviation.com/portal/news ... asia-india
AirAsia India brand will disappear and will be integrated into either IX or AI, as AirAsia Bhd pulls out entire stake. Unless, Tata group are willing to pay royalty to Air Asia for the brand.
BawliBooch wrote:
#1 I have seen 100 A321NEO figure been thrown around. So 110 A320N + 100 A321N along 70-80 widebodies.
#2 The A330-900 stands a chance instead of A350-900.
# 3 The big bad Blue wolf is the new Jet as far as "Policy Management" is concerned!
BawliBooch wrote:As I understood the full "leak", plan is for 300 total aircraft for delivery from 2024 onwards, 70% of which will be narrowbody - thats 210 narrowbodies and 70-80 widebodies.
AI operates 49 widebodies as of now so 80 widebodies will completely replace the current widebody fleet and account for growth. The 210 narrowbodies will be used to replace the A320ceo fleet of both Air India(70), Air India Express (40), Air Asia India(50) and Vistara(50) in the future. Number sounds about right when seen as a combined fleet.
I have seen 100 A321NEO figure been thrown around. So 110 A320N + 100 A321N along 70-80 widebodies.
This order is Airbus' to lose.
IMO, Air India will emulate the former IC model for domestic where the largest aircraft will be deployed on the largest P2P routes and work outwards from there. So BOM, DEL, MAA, CCU with BLR, GAU and HYD added to the "A321 Trunkliner" mix. Except for these 30 trunkliner pairs. They will compete mainly on Capacity rather than frequency. But I do expect to see "Same day return" become a major cornerstone of their route planning. The former IC used to offer same day return between 35 city pairs back in the day. These will return. Air India and Air Asia India have a very complementary network on domestic so the merger will undoubtedly see a massive increase in AI market share. The DEL base will stay, but a number of hubs that were withdrawn in 2007-2009 period to build up DEL will now return. The big questionmark is Slots.
For longhaul, North America will be focus market with JFK, ORD, SFO, IAD, YVR, YYZ along with newer stations like IAH, LAX. The A350-1000 to replace the 77W and A350-900 to replace the 787-8 seems like a good combo. The A330-900 stands a chance instead of A350-900.
Lets hope this goes through and does not fall prey to the kind of lobbying that India is notorious for. The big bad Blue wolf is the new Jet as far as "Policy Management" is concerned!
edealinfo wrote:#1: your putting all the eggs in Airbus' basket. I think this would be a long shot because of a) insufficient available production-slots with Airbus, b) the Tatas may want to hedge, and c) given the scale of the order, God only knows how much political pressure will be brought to bear.
#2: For which potential routes - The Gulf?
edealinfo wrote:BawliBooch wrote:# 3 The big bad Blue wolf is the new Jet as far as "Policy Management" is concerned!
#3: That went over my head. Care to explain? Thanks.
BawliBooch wrote:edealinfo wrote:#1: your putting all the eggs in Airbus' basket. I think this would be a long shot because of a) insufficient available production-slots with Airbus, b) the Tatas may want to hedge, and c) given the scale of the order, God only knows how much political pressure will be brought to bear.
There is precedence for "putting all eggs in one basket" as you put it. The 737MAX does not make sense anyway you look at it. Air India, Air asia India and Vistara all operate the A320neo. AIX fleet of 30 737-800 is nearing the age of replacement. Unless Boeing is ready to give away the 737MAX for virtually free, the narrowbody order should be Airbus.
The widebody order is more complex. Boeing has a chance with the 787-9/10, but the A350 is just a better fit for Air India overall. Available in 2 lengths perfectly suited for Air India operations. -1000HGW for North America and -900 for Europe. The -900ULR could be used as an option later to open long thin routes. Biggest advantage would be crew compatibility. A mix of 737MAX and 787 would not offer this advantage.
The 787-8s have some of the most ridiculous lease rates and 18/27 are getting close to their D-Checks. The 77Ws are getting close to their second D-Check. Might just be cheaper to return the leased aircraft, convert the 9 owned 77W/787 to Freighters or something.
I find it funny that people who believe that Southwest is locked into Boeing think that Air India should split 220 aircraft narrowbody order between Boeing and Airbus!#2: For which potential routes - The Gulf?
The A330-900 is an outlier - Perhaps an idea that should be looked at as an alternative to A350-900. Cheaper with more availability and a capable enough platform for upto 5000nm flights. With a lower MTOW, they would offer allow Air India to offer cheaper inventory to key markets in Europe, Middle East and ASEAN markets. the -900 can always be looked at later?
Opus99 wrote:BawliBooch wrote:edealinfo wrote:#1: your putting all the eggs in Airbus' basket. I think this would be a long shot because of a) insufficient available production-slots with Airbus, b) the Tatas may want to hedge, and c) given the scale of the order, God only knows how much political pressure will be brought to bear.
There is precedence for "putting all eggs in one basket" as you put it. The 737MAX does not make sense anyway you look at it. Air India, Air asia India and Vistara all operate the A320neo. AIX fleet of 30 737-800 is nearing the age of replacement. Unless Boeing is ready to give away the 737MAX for virtually free, the narrowbody order should be Airbus.
The widebody order is more complex. Boeing has a chance with the 787-9/10, but the A350 is just a better fit for Air India overall. Available in 2 lengths perfectly suited for Air India operations. -1000HGW for North America and -900 for Europe. The -900ULR could be used as an option later to open long thin routes. Biggest advantage would be crew compatibility. A mix of 737MAX and 787 would not offer this advantage.
The 787-8s have some of the most ridiculous lease rates and 18/27 are getting close to their D-Checks. The 77Ws are getting close to their second D-Check. Might just be cheaper to return the leased aircraft, convert the 9 owned 77W/787 to Freighters or something.
I find it funny that people who believe that Southwest is locked into Boeing think that Air India should split 220 aircraft narrowbody order between Boeing and Airbus!#2: For which potential routes - The Gulf?
The A330-900 is an outlier - Perhaps an idea that should be looked at as an alternative to A350-900. Cheaper with more availability and a capable enough platform for upto 5000nm flights. With a lower MTOW, they would offer allow Air India to offer cheaper inventory to key markets in Europe, Middle East and ASEAN markets. the -900 can always be looked at later?
They should return 777s and 787s and order 350s? WOW. I’ve never seen such business happen before, but I guess there’s a first time for everything
BawliBooch wrote:Available in 2 lengths perfectly suited for Air India operations. -1000HGW for North America and -900 for Europe. The -900ULR could be used as an option later to open long thin routes. Biggest advantage would be crew compatibility. A mix of 737MAX and 787 would not offer this advantage.
BawliBooch wrote:The 787-8s have some of the most ridiculous lease rates and 18/27 are getting close to their D-Checks. The 77Ws are getting close to their second D-Check. Might just be cheaper to return the leased aircraft, convert the 9 owned 77W/787 to Freighters or something.
portola2727 wrote:I wonder if the airports in India could expand as much as AI is looking to expand. I know Chennai(my home airport in India) is very much constrained at the moment and I wonder if AI could expand further at the airport.
acavpics wrote:If AI gets the 737 MAX, do you think some of them would go to Air India Express to replace their 737-800's. I haven't seen any mention of the future of the IX fleet.
lightsaber wrote:This order is huge. Combined with Indigo, it will make it tough for smaller Indian airlines.
For this size of order, assuming it is over a decade of deliveries, both companies will make slots available.
Opus99 wrote:https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-06-19/air-india-said-to-consider-order-for-300-narrow-body-planes
Bloomberg reporting it’s either going to be NEOs, MAX or a mix.
Opus99 wrote:They should return 777s and 787s and order 350s? WOW. I’ve never seen such business happen before, but I guess there’s a first time for everything
BawliBooch wrote:Opus99 wrote:They should return 777s and 787s and order 350s? WOW. I’ve never seen such business happen before, but I guess there’s a first time for everything
Never seen such a deal happen before?
Boeing did it with Air Canada, Singapore Airlines just to name 2. Both these airlines swapped out their A340s for 777/787 after Boeing cut them a deal.
So it has happened before.
Airbus will cement its lead in the Indian market and get a newly revived Flag Carrier as their customer.
Opus99 wrote:yes, because the 340 was low hanging fruit. 787? not so much you want them to replace an aircraft (in a different size category) with the same generation of aircraft, based on what? the 350 lease rate will still be more expensive, the 787 rate can be re-negotiated.
Opus99 wrote:787-8, a359 and 777-300ER 3 completely different size categories that make a complete modern wide body fleet that can cater to a wider route network but Bawlibooch thinks they should throw away mid-life very useable 777/787s and buy 350s because maybe this is a game with a reset button.
avier wrote:They do plan to expand IX, but mostly int'l. They're looking at expanding to around 30 countries including, Cambodia, China, Indonesia, the Philippines, Turkey, and Vietnam per their CCO.
https://www.moneycontrol.com/news/busin ... 79321.html
Though I don't know how well the 737MAX performs for some of the long int'l routes they are planning.
BawliBooch wrote:Opus99 wrote:yes, because the 340 was low hanging fruit. 787? not so much you want them to replace an aircraft (in a different size category) with the same generation of aircraft, based on what? the 350 lease rate will still be more expensive, the 787 rate can be re-negotiated.
That would have been true if Air India had originally gone for the more optimized 787-9s with better lease terms and maintenance deals. However Air India got the older, heavier 787-8s with expensive leases and nightmare maintenance contracts that saw some of them hatching eggs on BOM apron for months at a time. A new owner will see value in making a clean start.Opus99 wrote:787-8, a359 and 777-300ER 3 completely different size categories that make a complete modern wide body fleet that can cater to a wider route network but Bawlibooch thinks they should throw away mid-life very useable 777/787s and buy 350s because maybe this is a game with a reset button.
If you could replace 3 widebody types mentioned with 2 variants of the same type rating A350-900 and A350-1000HGW, doesnt that make more sense? Add to that, if you had a 200 strong narrowbody fleet with common type rating allowing for a seamless crew transition opportunities wouldnt you do it?
Lets be logical here!avier wrote:They do plan to expand IX, but mostly int'l. They're looking at expanding to around 30 countries including, Cambodia, China, Indonesia, the Philippines, Turkey, and Vietnam per their CCO.
https://www.moneycontrol.com/news/busin ... 79321.html
Though I don't know how well the 737MAX performs for some of the long int'l routes they are planning.
At the time of the original 737-800 order, the 737 with winglets was found to be more optimised compared to the non wingletted A320 for the 4 hour average stage length of AIX flights. That factor no longer applies. Add to that the benefits of making a common order for the group, the disadvantages of having an orphan 737MAX fleet for AIX and the negative press around the 737MAX, it makes better sense to make a common order for the group.
PS: Air India pilots have already received messages from the Crewing departments about the A350. I think Widebody a done deal. Time to stop beating the 787 horse! The battle is for the narrowbody order.
Opus99 wrote:787-8, a359 and 777-300ER 3 completely different size categories that make a complete modern wide body fleet that can cater to a wider route network
avier wrote:Opus99 wrote:787-8, a359 and 777-300ER 3 completely different size categories that make a complete modern wide body fleet that can cater to a wider route network
It isn't very efficient to have three different types of WB's that to with lesser numbers of them. Having three different pool of pilots for just WB fleet is complicating the business model.