Moderators: richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
DavidByrne wrote:Interestingly, NZ’s JFK service will operate Mon/Th/Sa, while QF’s will be We/Fr/Su. Head-to-head, but not quite.
NZ516 wrote:NZ6 wrote:tullamarine wrote:What they didn't announce but probably have already decided is that this route will be canned after about 2 years when the direct SYD-JFK services commence using the Sunrise A350s.
I think that's exactly what will happen.
I've read a lot about how QF ruined NZ's day. Firstly any headline away from the loss isn't ruining anything. QF essentially admitting thy can't give ground to NZ until Sunrise delivers SYD-JFK proves what strong position NZ has in the AU-US market.
I suspect and agree QF will remain in the NZ-US market post sunrise, my guess is they'll move to AKL-DFW
While "unexpected" there's always been a high level of risk at NZ that QF would reopen North America and take back some of that direct deeper traffic beyond LAX on their own metal.
Qantas says it wants to keep AKL-JFK and SYD-JFK simultaneously, believing JFK has enough O&D. With AA also on AKL-DFW the One World alliance will have even a stronger foot hold in NZ.
NZ6 wrote:NZ516 wrote:NZ6 wrote:
I think that's exactly what will happen.
I've read a lot about how QF ruined NZ's day. Firstly any headline away from the loss isn't ruining anything. QF essentially admitting thy can't give ground to NZ until Sunrise delivers SYD-JFK proves what strong position NZ has in the AU-US market.
I suspect and agree QF will remain in the NZ-US market post sunrise, my guess is they'll move to AKL-DFW
While "unexpected" there's always been a high level of risk at NZ that QF would reopen North America and take back some of that direct deeper traffic beyond LAX on their own metal.
Qantas says it wants to keep AKL-JFK and SYD-JFK simultaneously, believing JFK has enough O&D. With AA also on AKL-DFW the One World alliance will have even a stronger foot hold in NZ.
Cool what they say and what I predict differ, QF isn't likely going to come outright and say we intend to axe the route when we open SYD.
NZ6 wrote:NZ516 wrote:NZ6 wrote:
I think that's exactly what will happen.
I've read a lot about how QF ruined NZ's day. Firstly any headline away from the loss isn't ruining anything. QF essentially admitting thy can't give ground to NZ until Sunrise delivers SYD-JFK proves what strong position NZ has in the AU-US market.
I suspect and agree QF will remain in the NZ-US market post sunrise, my guess is they'll move to AKL-DFW
While "unexpected" there's always been a high level of risk at NZ that QF would reopen North America and take back some of that direct deeper traffic beyond LAX on their own metal.
Qantas says it wants to keep AKL-JFK and SYD-JFK simultaneously, believing JFK has enough O&D. With AA also on AKL-DFW the One World alliance will have even a stronger foot hold in NZ.
Cool what they say and what I predict differ, QF isn't likely going to come outright and say we intend to axe the route when we open SYD.
ZK-NBT wrote:
Yep QF have talked about MEL-JFK as well, AKL-JFK is a heck of a long flight when it might take a few pax that wish to stop plus some connections from BNE and anywhere else they might add into AKL from Australia, it won’t fill a plane and while they will get a little bit of traffic ex AKL I would think NZ would be daily by then. In fact I wouldn’t be surprised if NZ increase before QF even start.
NZ321 wrote:Just perhaps... If QF come along next with "SYD/MEL/BNE etc" via AKL to ORD (since the once much touted QF launch of nonstop service from BNE to ORD seems to have vanished from the radar), NZ could consider launching AKL-YYZ? It's shorter than JFK, so very doable, no way QF will go for a direct connection on that route, and NZ and AC can work together to make it stick. Could also see YYZ working for connections.
ZK-NBT wrote:NZ321 wrote:Just perhaps... If QF come along next with "SYD/MEL/BNE etc" via AKL to ORD (since the once much touted QF launch of nonstop service from BNE to ORD seems to have vanished from the radar), NZ could consider launching AKL-YYZ? It's shorter than JFK, so very doable, no way QF will go for a direct connection on that route, and NZ and AC can work together to make it stick. Could also see YYZ working for connections.
NZ biggest problem will be lack of aircraft, I could see them increase JFK, the new 787s are now due late 2024. It is possible I think QF do AKL-ORD if they have enough aircraft as well.
NZ516 wrote:ZK-NBT wrote:NZ321 wrote:Just perhaps... If QF come along next with "SYD/MEL/BNE etc" via AKL to ORD (since the once much touted QF launch of nonstop service from BNE to ORD seems to have vanished from the radar), NZ could consider launching AKL-YYZ? It's shorter than JFK, so very doable, no way QF will go for a direct connection on that route, and NZ and AC can work together to make it stick. Could also see YYZ working for connections.
NZ biggest problem will be lack of aircraft, I could see them increase JFK, the new 787s are now due late 2024. It is possible I think QF do AKL-ORD if they have enough aircraft as well.
This is a real big challenge more so for QF but does effect NZ too. QF might have to lease some 787s soon as the 3 on order won't be enough to restart BNE and MEL to SFO and their proposed BNE to ORD. Plus a lot of their existing flights are not back to daily yet. I can see the proposed NZ lease aircraft being extended to help cover all their reinstated routes.
PA515 wrote:Today's AKL-HBA-AKL was cancelled. ZK-NNC was meant to do it but it's doing AKL-ZQN-AKL x 2 instead.
https://www.flightradar24.com/data/aircraft/zk-nnc
PA515
DavidByrne wrote:PA515 wrote:Today's AKL-HBA-AKL was cancelled. ZK-NNC was meant to do it but it's doing AKL-ZQN-AKL x 2 instead.
https://www.flightradar24.com/data/aircraft/zk-nnc
PA515
Was at MEL this morning and NZ’s MEL-ZQN was cancelled as well. Was there a reason for either cancellation that anyone is aware of? Interesting also that AKL-HBA was to have been an A321 again - how often does this happen?
ZK-NBT wrote:NZ516 wrote:ZK-NBT wrote:
NZ biggest problem will be lack of aircraft, I could see them increase JFK, the new 787s are now due late 2024. It is possible I think QF do AKL-ORD if they have enough aircraft as well.
This is a real big challenge more so for QF but does effect NZ too. QF might have to lease some 787s soon as the 3 on order won't be enough to restart BNE and MEL to SFO and their proposed BNE to ORD. Plus a lot of their existing flights are not back to daily yet. I can see the proposed NZ lease aircraft being extended to help cover all their reinstated routes.
QF will now have all 10 A380s back in service by years end 2023. I would think these will only replace 789 flying to free them up. Not sure on MEL/BNE-SFO, SYD-SFO has been pushed back again due aircraft shortage, now Feb 2023, BNE-SFO would get an A332. Not sure if they will actually do ORD or not? And from BNE or AKL possibly?
zkncj wrote:A quick look at Flightradar24, the a321N allocation for today (Sunday)
NHA: chc-syd-wlg-bne-wlg
NHB: chc-bne-zqn-bne-chc
NHC: akl-cns-akl-wlg
NHD: wlg-chc-ool-chc
NHE: wlg-syd-zqn-Syd-chc
NHF: chc-mel-zqn-mel-chc
Rough allocations seem to be,
AKL 1x
WLG 2x
CHC 3x
B752OS wrote:NZ is really putting their 789 fleet to work recently. Using it on AKL-IAH/LAX/SFO/YVR/NRT/HKG/PVG/SIN/ICN/TPE/PER/HNL. Will they also use it to ORD and JFK? If so, it's impressive they are able to service all of these cities (I know not all are daily) at such long stage lengths. When will the 77Ws come back online? Do they have orders to expand their long-haul fleet so they can eventually make destinations that were formerly daily, back to daily?
zkncj wrote:B752OS wrote:NZ is really putting their 789 fleet to work recently. Using it on AKL-IAH/LAX/SFO/YVR/NRT/HKG/PVG/SIN/ICN/TPE/PER/HNL. Will they also use it to ORD and JFK? If so, it's impressive they are able to service all of these cities (I know not all are daily) at such long stage lengths. When will the 77Ws come back online? Do they have orders to expand their long-haul fleet so they can eventually make destinations that were formerly daily, back to daily?
The 789s also service, AKL to syd,bne,mel,per,nan,rar,apw.
They have another 8x 789/781s on order, but with order delays are a couple of years away.
The 77Ws are back already, with 2 in service now and the third almost. The rest will return over the next 3-6months, as they are restored from long term storage.
ZK-NBT wrote:zkncj wrote:A quick look at Flightradar24, the a321N allocation for today (Sunday)
NHA: chc-syd-wlg-bne-wlg
NHB: chc-bne-zqn-bne-chc
NHC: akl-cns-akl-wlg
NHD: wlg-chc-ool-chc
NHE: wlg-syd-zqn-Syd-chc
NHF: chc-mel-zqn-mel-chc
Rough allocations seem to be,
AKL 1x
WLG 2x
CHC 3x
That is A320N. Yep mostly A321 ex AKL, CNS seems to get a mix as well probably more aircraft allocation related than demand related at times?
ZK-NBT wrote:It looks like NZ will operate 77W AKL-SIN between December 5th Through January 14th.
ZK-NBT wrote:ZK-NBT wrote:It looks like NZ will operate 77W AKL-SIN between December 5th Through January 14th.
SFO shows 789 again for the same period SIN shows 77W, that is the period where there should be 5 77Ws, then OKO leaves. Other than Daily LAX I don’t yet know where the other 2 77Ws are, MEL is the only short haul 77W showing atm.
Sprite8806 wrote:Hey, a couple months back we had a conversation about EK potentially coming to WLG with their 777-200LRs, and we kind of concluded it's extremely unlikely for them to come, atleast with their current fleet. Is there any chance that they could fly to WLG with their 787s or A350s when they get delivered in a few years?
LamboAston wrote:Sprite8806 wrote:Hey, a couple months back we had a conversation about EK potentially coming to WLG with their 777-200LRs, and we kind of concluded it's extremely unlikely for them to come, atleast with their current fleet. Is there any chance that they could fly to WLG with their 787s or A350s when they get delivered in a few years?
I doubt it without a runway extension.
ZK-NBT wrote:It looks like NZ will operate 77W AKL-SIN between December 5th Through January 14th.
NZ321 wrote:ZK-NBT wrote:It looks like NZ will operate 77W AKL-SIN between December 5th Through January 14th.
Thanks for that; that's great news for me. not often I get to do an NZ 77W these days, based in KUL. BTW I could be wrong, but I don't think NZ have ever regularly scheduled the 77W onto SIN-AKL. I guess there must be a reasonable demand for seats (premium ones too) during this period if they're allocating a 77W onto SIN-AKL when they haven't previously done so ?
ZK-NBT wrote:NZ321 wrote:ZK-NBT wrote:It looks like NZ will operate 77W AKL-SIN between December 5th Through January 14th.
Thanks for that; that's great news for me. not often I get to do an NZ 77W these days, based in KUL. BTW I could be wrong, but I don't think NZ have ever regularly scheduled the 77W onto SIN-AKL. I guess there must be a reasonable demand for seats (premium ones too) during this period if they're allocating a 77W onto SIN-AKL when they haven't previously done so ?
The 77W has never been regularly scheduled to Asia. Demand is high for sure, NZ were originally going to operate CHC-SIN but don’t have enough aircraft so looks like the next best thing to cover was a 77W ex AKL, SQ will be 11 weekly 77W/359 and daily 359 ex CHC.
LamboAston wrote:Sprite8806 wrote:Hey, a couple months back we had a conversation about EK potentially coming to WLG with their 777-200LRs, and we kind of concluded it's extremely unlikely for them to come, atleast with their current fleet. Is there any chance that they could fly to WLG with their 787s or A350s when they get delivered in a few years?
I doubt it without a runway extension.
NZ516 wrote:ZK-NBT wrote:NZ321 wrote:
Thanks for that; that's great news for me. not often I get to do an NZ 77W these days, based in KUL. BTW I could be wrong, but I don't think NZ have ever regularly scheduled the 77W onto SIN-AKL. I guess there must be a reasonable demand for seats (premium ones too) during this period if they're allocating a 77W onto SIN-AKL when they haven't previously done so ?
The 77W has never been regularly scheduled to Asia. Demand is high for sure, NZ were originally going to operate CHC-SIN but don’t have enough aircraft so looks like the next best thing to cover was a 77W ex AKL, SQ will be 11 weekly 77W/359 and daily 359 ex CHC.
An interesting development. It must be a solid performer AKL-SIN to get the upgrade from 789-77W. The return Y fares to SIN were higher than the other Asian routes that a further away from AKL which really shows something. Now we have the 3rd 77W allocated where will the other 3 be heading perhaps SFO daily and IAH it has been there in the past.
LamboAston wrote:Sprite8806 wrote:Hey, a couple months back we had a conversation about EK potentially coming to WLG with their 777-200LRs, and we kind of concluded it's extremely unlikely for them to come, atleast with their current fleet. Is there any chance that they could fly to WLG with their 787s or A350s when they get delivered in a few years?
I doubt it without a runway extension.
a7ala wrote:LamboAston wrote:Sprite8806 wrote:Hey, a couple months back we had a conversation about EK potentially coming to WLG with their 777-200LRs, and we kind of concluded it's extremely unlikely for them to come, atleast with their current fleet. Is there any chance that they could fly to WLG with their 787s or A350s when they get delivered in a few years?
I doubt it without a runway extension.
You would need MCTOW takeoff to do it non-stop WLG->DXB which is getting into the realms of a 3000m runway (around 1000m than the airport has now). Even the LR would need a runway of that length.
I think the previous WLG EK discussion was that someone said they have inside info that EK was looking at a DXB-WLG-CHC-DXB triangle which is possible from the existing runway. The B787 variants, A359, B77L and B77W should be able to land no problem at WLG enabling triangles with AKL/CHC and tags with Australia.
NZ516 wrote:ZK-NBT wrote:NZ321 wrote:
Thanks for that; that's great news for me. not often I get to do an NZ 77W these days, based in KUL. BTW I could be wrong, but I don't think NZ have ever regularly scheduled the 77W onto SIN-AKL. I guess there must be a reasonable demand for seats (premium ones too) during this period if they're allocating a 77W onto SIN-AKL when they haven't previously done so ?
The 77W has never been regularly scheduled to Asia. Demand is high for sure, NZ were originally going to operate CHC-SIN but don’t have enough aircraft so looks like the next best thing to cover was a 77W ex AKL, SQ will be 11 weekly 77W/359 and daily 359 ex CHC.
An interesting development. It must be a solid performer AKL-SIN to get the upgrade from 789-77W. The return Y fares to SIN were higher than the other Asian routes that a further away from AKL which really shows something. Now we have the 3rd 77W allocated where will the other 3 be heading perhaps SFO daily and IAH it has been there in the past.
ZK-NBT wrote:NZ321 wrote:Just perhaps... If QF come along next with "SYD/MEL/BNE etc" via AKL to ORD (since the once much touted QF launch of nonstop service from BNE to ORD seems to have vanished from the radar), NZ could consider launching AKL-YYZ? It's shorter than JFK, so very doable, no way QF will go for a direct connection on that route, and NZ and AC can work together to make it stick. Could also see YYZ working for connections.
NZ biggest problem will be lack of aircraft, I could see them increase JFK, the new 787s are now due late 2024. It is possible I think QF do AKL-ORD if they have enough aircraft as well.
Sprite8806 wrote:Any update on Virgin Australia coming to NZ
bwwt wrote:ZK-NBT wrote:NZ321 wrote:Just perhaps... If QF come along next with "SYD/MEL/BNE etc" via AKL to ORD (since the once much touted QF launch of nonstop service from BNE to ORD seems to have vanished from the radar), NZ could consider launching AKL-YYZ? It's shorter than JFK, so very doable, no way QF will go for a direct connection on that route, and NZ and AC can work together to make it stick. Could also see YYZ working for connections.
NZ biggest problem will be lack of aircraft, I could see them increase JFK, the new 787s are now due late 2024. It is possible I think QF do AKL-ORD if they have enough aircraft as well.
Not sure why they would go via AKL to ORD if they can do it via BNE? It would be longer for most, if not all Aus destinations and provide far less connections.
ZK-NBT wrote:https://www.aeroroutes.com/eng/220829-nznw22na
NZ North America changes for NW.
Not surprised at additional LAX frequency with no AA on that route. Overall SFO capacity is almost exactly the same with 5 789s assuming code 2, vs 4 77W, 77W still offers more premium seats at 4 weekly than 789 at 5 weekly.
ZK-NBT wrote:ZK-NBT wrote:It looks like NZ will operate 77W AKL-SIN between December 5th Through January 14th.
SFO shows 789 again for the same period SIN shows 77W, that is the period where there should be 5 77Ws, then OKO leaves. Other than Daily LAX I don’t yet know where the other 2 77Ws are, MEL is the only short haul 77W showing atm.
bwwt wrote:ZK-NBT wrote:NZ321 wrote:Just perhaps... If QF come along next with "SYD/MEL/BNE etc" via AKL to ORD (since the once much touted QF launch of nonstop service from BNE to ORD seems to have vanished from the radar), NZ could consider launching AKL-YYZ? It's shorter than JFK, so very doable, no way QF will go for a direct connection on that route, and NZ and AC can work together to make it stick. Could also see YYZ working for connections.
NZ biggest problem will be lack of aircraft, I could see them increase JFK, the new 787s are now due late 2024. It is possible I think QF do AKL-ORD if they have enough aircraft as well.
Not sure why they would go via AKL to ORD if they can do it via BNE? It would be longer for most, if not all Aus destinations and provide far less connections.
SCFlyer wrote:Sprite8806 wrote:Any update on Virgin Australia coming to NZ
Only for the planned Queenstown flights for the foreseeable future. Unlikely to be flying anywhere else in NZ when their international 737 fleet is planned to make revenue elsewhere (Other South Pacific ex SYD and BNE and OOL-Bali)
Sprite8806 wrote:Hey, a couple months back we had a conversation about EK potentially coming to WLG with their 777-200LRs, and we kind of concluded it's extremely unlikely for them to come, atleast with their current fleet. Is there any chance that they could fly to WLG with their 787s or A350s when they get delivered in a few years?
On top of that Zeke has reported on the basis of the Airbus performance database that an A359 ex Wellington (current runways) can reach multiple destinations in Asia nonstop will full pax.