Moderators: richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
melpax wrote:Looking at their route map, they have a good opportunity to get into the Australia-Japan market in the same manner as PR, etc.
melpax wrote:Looking at their route map, they have a good opportunity to get into the Australia-Japan market in the same manner as PR, etc.
ZK-NBT wrote:Surprised they only have 1 737, I thought they had 3-4 including a 73G? At some point anyway?
Do we expect them to buy or less brand new? Otherwise they almost seem like a good fit for the 3 JQ 788s that we’re for sale, not sure if they still are?
Maybe A220s would be a good 737, Fokker replacement? What are some of the more regional airports in PNG like?
smi0006 wrote:ZK-NBT wrote:Surprised they only have 1 737, I thought they had 3-4 including a 73G? At some point anyway?
Do we expect them to buy or less brand new? Otherwise they almost seem like a good fit for the 3 JQ 788s that we’re for sale, not sure if they still are?
Maybe A220s would be a good 737, Fokker replacement? What are some of the more regional airports in PNG like?
Didn’t they park a 737 in the ocean a few years back?
ZK-NBT wrote:Surprised they only have 1 737, I thought they had 3-4 including a 73G? At some point anyway?
AAMDanny wrote:If they did feel the sway towards Airbus... a combination of A330-xxx/A320-xxx could mean one single type rating pool of pilots, which itself would unlock a new synergy of operational resource.
Plenty of used A330-200's on the market which in terms of reference for lower deck cargo space offers 132.4 m3 vs the B767-300 which offers 114.1 m3
AAPilot48Heavy wrote:AAMDanny wrote:If they did feel the sway towards Airbus... a combination of A330-xxx/A320-xxx could mean one single type rating pool of pilots, which itself would unlock a new synergy of operational resource.
Plenty of used A330-200's on the market which in terms of reference for lower deck cargo space offers 132.4 m3 vs the B767-300 which offers 114.1 m3
Can you elaborate on ‘the same pilot pool’? The pilots won’t be able to fly a A330 one day and the A320 the next. It’s no different than a 787 and 737 pilot.
AAPilot48Heavy wrote:Can you elaborate on ‘the same pilot pool’? The pilots won’t be able to fly a A330 one day and the A320 the next. It’s no different than a 787 and 737 pilot.
bunumuring wrote:Hey guys,
At one stage many years ago Air Niugini was suppose to get a Dreamliner 8 with a second on option...
Like the story decades ago with the BAe 146 purchase, it simply never happened.
Expect some political behind-the-scenes dealing over these replacement orders, similar to what happened when Air Niugini ended up with the A310 rather than the (reportedly) preferred 767 in the 1990s BEFORE the current 767 fleet replaced the A310.
Freight will be a huge factor in these orders. I've always been surprised that a pure jet freighter or two haven't appeared in Air Niugini service - perhaps the existing 737NGs could be converted to add to a possible MAX fleet?
I have no idea what the status of the previously mentioned MAX order is, though I vaguely recall a mention of it being cancelled in the aftermath of the two MAX crashes.
A couple of ex-Jetstar Dreamliner 8s would be a good start : perhaps even a couple of ex-Jetstar A32X ceos as well and even a converted A321F like QF Freight... IF the MAX deal is dead.
I think second hand A330s are a possibility, but more likely would be a couple of A330neos leased in.
As for the Fokker replacements, perhaps a fleet of used Embraer 170s and / or 190s (like Alliance / QF Link did) would do the trick. I think that a purchase of new A220s might stretch things a little far.
It will be interesting to watch the fleet development of Air Niugini.
Take care,
Bunumuring.
DavidByrne wrote:Re POM being a transit point: There was a time, many many years back, when NZ, CX and PX had a tripartite route AKL-POM-HKG. Operation alternated (by season?) between NZ and CX. Does anybody recall whether PX operated it was well? I think it would have been with 707s if they did.
DavidByrne wrote:Re POM being a transit point: There was a time, many many years back, when NZ, CX and PX had a tripartite route AKL-POM-HKG. Operation alternated (by season?) between NZ and CX. Does anybody recall whether PX operated it was well? I think it would have been with 707s if they did.
cedarjet wrote:Wonder how it works at Aer Lingus?
vhqpa wrote:I’m wondering about the Fokker replacement, the A220 could be a good replacement as long the hot and high performance is good enough for the highlands, it’s a bit bigger than the Fokker 70 but that can be backfilled by more secondhand Dash 8-400s for Link PNG. Qantas and Air Vanuatu (if they don’t cancel) will operate the type so there would be regional support, But then Pixie generally lease second hand aircraft so Embraer 190 seems more likely replacement.
SXDFC wrote:smi0006 wrote:ZK-NBT wrote:Surprised they only have 1 737, I thought they had 3-4 including a 73G? At some point anyway?
Do we expect them to buy or less brand new? Otherwise they almost seem like a good fit for the 3 JQ 788s that we’re for sale, not sure if they still are?
Maybe A220s would be a good 737, Fokker replacement? What are some of the more regional airports in PNG like?
Didn’t they park a 737 in the ocean a few years back?
Did they ever recover it?
DavidByrne wrote:Re POM being a transit point: There was a time, many many years back, when NZ, CX and PX had a tripartite route AKL-POM-HKG. Operation alternated (by season?) between NZ and CX. Does anybody recall whether PX operated it was well? I think it would have been with 707s if they did.
NZ516 wrote:DavidByrne wrote:Re POM being a transit point: There was a time, many many years back, when NZ, CX and PX had a tripartite route AKL-POM-HKG. Operation alternated (by season?) between NZ and CX. Does anybody recall whether PX operated it was well? I think it would have been with 707s if they did.
Yes it was a Boeing 707 and I remember seeing one on gate 7 at AKL airport in 1982.
ZK-NBT wrote:NZ516 wrote:DavidByrne wrote:Re POM being a transit point: There was a time, many many years back, when NZ, CX and PX had a tripartite route AKL-POM-HKG. Operation alternated (by season?) between NZ and CX. Does anybody recall whether PX operated it was well? I think it would have been with 707s if they did.
Yes it was a Boeing 707 and I remember seeing one on gate 7 at AKL airport in 1982.
That’s an impressive memory. It was a non contact gate, ie no airbridge then, only gates 1-6 had bridges.I think it was gate 7 I walked from a CO 747 as a young boy in 1987 with my parents.
CX started AKL in 1983 via POM but I think you are right that PX served AKL around then and we’re initially part of an NZ/CX/PX deal, though I don’t think NZ stopped at POM, they were doing AKL-HKG on the D10 in 1980, I think it started via SYD or BNE around 1976 from memory.
zkojq wrote:Well, there's one at the bottom of Chuuk Lagoon, about half a kilometer short of the runway...but yes, in my mind they had a similar number. I guess for them it made sense to return them during covid.
T54A wrote:Rumor: 2x Fiji Airways A330's going to PNG. Fiji getting 2x A350's as replacement.
kriskim wrote:Hopefully it will give them a chance to do a rebrand with a new livery and logo.
T54A wrote:Rumor: 2x Fiji Airways A330's going to PNG. Fiji getting 2x A350's as replacement.
SCFlyer wrote:I would say FJ may want to possibly simplify their widebody fleet (e.g all A359), hence the A330 to PX rumours.
I think at least 2 of the ex-Norwegian Long Haul 787s may also be ideal candidates for PX.
Not sure about the x3 JQ 788s going to PX, more likely there's a better chance of 3, maybe 4 of JQ's 788s ending up at QF mainline for mostly ex-BNE-USA (and Asia/Singapore) services with a reconfigured cabin to accomodate a crew rest, freeing up the A330s for SYD/MEL-Asia.
kriskim wrote:Hopefully it will give them a chance to do a rebrand with a new livery and logo.
Motorhussy wrote:kriskim wrote:Hopefully it will give them a chance to do a rebrand with a new livery and logo.
Are you insane? (Joke, not really accusing of madness) The kumul (bird of paradise) is emblematic of PNG and it’s airline. Plus it looks smashing.
Back to OG post, I think PNG can’t afford new planes so will/should opt for pre-loved A330’s (-200 and -300) plus new A321-xlr and A220 (-300 and -100), the A321 is good for freight and higher frequency on some existing longer routes or for opening new ones.
kriskim wrote:Motorhussy wrote:kriskim wrote:Hopefully it will give them a chance to do a rebrand with a new livery and logo.
Are you insane? (Joke, not really accusing of madness) The kumul (bird of paradise) is emblematic of PNG and it’s airline. Plus it looks smashing.
Back to OG post, I think PNG can’t afford new planes so will/should opt for pre-loved A330’s (-200 and -300) plus new A321-xlr and A220 (-300 and -100), the A321 is good for freight and higher frequency on some existing longer routes or for opening new ones.
Not saying they should get rid of the Kumul, just saying that the brand needs a little refresh and with a new fleet, it’s the best time to do this.
Air Niugini’s brand isn’t as strong as FJ, SB or TN.