Moderators: richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
davidjohnson6 wrote:Moving OneWorld's HQ to the same city as one of the major airlines in the alliance is probably a bad idea. It means OneWorld will (or at least be perceived by other airlines) end up giving more attention to American than other airlines. At the very least, OneWorld employees are likely to end up spending a lot more time with AA employees, and by default end up favouring the people who they know well - i.e. AA employees. OneWorld is not meant to be just American and its buddies.
OneWorld should have its HQ in a city which is not dominated by any of its member airlines, so as to retain not just its independence of all airlines, but also avoid any suspicion of giving special favours to one airline
mercure1 wrote:davidjohnson6 wrote:Moving OneWorld's HQ to the same city as one of the major airlines in the alliance is probably a bad idea. It means OneWorld will (or at least be perceived by other airlines) end up giving more attention to American than other airlines. At the very least, OneWorld employees are likely to end up spending a lot more time with AA employees, and by default end up favouring the people who they know well - i.e. AA employees. OneWorld is not meant to be just American and its buddies.
OneWorld should have its HQ in a city which is not dominated by any of its member airlines, so as to retain not just its independence of all airlines, but also avoid any suspicion of giving special favours to one airline
If you remember when OW was founded they based it in Vancouver, home of Canadian. They moved it to NYC after Air Canada took over. I understand in NYC, OW was colocated with AA, BA and JL regional HQ teams.
But being based in an alliance partner home town is nothing new. Star is in Frankfurt and ST are in Amsterdam.
davidjohnson6 wrote:Moving OneWorld's HQ to the same city as one of the major airlines in the alliance is probably a bad idea. It means OneWorld will (or at least be perceived by other airlines) end up giving more attention to American than other airlines. At the very least, OneWorld employees are likely to end up spending a lot more time with AA employees, and by default end up favouring the people who they know well - i.e. AA employees. OneWorld is not meant to be just American and its buddies.
OneWorld should have its HQ in a city which is not dominated by any of its member airlines, so as to retain not just its independence of all airlines, but also avoid any suspicion of giving special favours to one airline
PHLspecial wrote:I will give it 5 - 10 years until Oneworld HQ moves to Doha for tax reasons.
usflyer msp wrote:PHLspecial wrote:I will give it 5 - 10 years until Oneworld HQ moves to Doha for tax reasons.
What income does oneworld have to pay taxes on? It is basically a nonprofit.
UPlog wrote:Outside of some potential PR/prestige reasons not sure why bother be based in costly and difficult city like NYC.
I am sure colocating on the AA campus makes good business sense for the alliance. For staff, they probably will get nice instant raise thanks to no tax Texas and where their income will go much farther than NYC.
For travel, DFW is well connected to many corners of the world, so should not be a logistical challenge.
USAirALB wrote:usflyer msp wrote:PHLspecial wrote:I will give it 5 - 10 years until Oneworld HQ moves to Doha for tax reasons.
What income does oneworld have to pay taxes on? It is basically a nonprofit.
Exactly my thinking...it isn't like Oneworld is a major for-profit corporation with income. It's irrelevant to where their HQ is.
How many employees does OW actually have on payroll that aren't directly employed with an OW alliance carrier?