airbazar wrote:
SIN has had a tropical theme and gardens since T1 first opened in 1981. It is a common theme across all terminals and it makes sense because Singapore is a tropical country. DOH out right stole Changi's idea and applied it where it doesn't belong.
So now its not to do with the Jewel, but the general tropical theme and the concept of indoor gardens, and repeating ideas is out right stealing and there is an issue with applying something where it doesn't belong. Let's apply the same standards to Singapore Airport (which is probably my favourite airport).
Singapore Airport has lounges, retail, jetbridges, baggage carousels, parallel runways all things pioneered by other airports. Should duty free in its current form be only at Shannon Airport since they have innovated the concept and all other airports avoid it as that would be copying and stealing? Maybe jetbridges should be confined to O'Hare since that was were it was first used and all other airports that use it would be stealing an idea. Should Changi not have been inspired by Schipol when they designed the airport? Of course not, I would welcome airports taking the good ideas from other airports, applying best practices and adding amenities.
Imagine applying your logic to airlines, all those airlines with flat business class seats stole the idea from British Airways and what is with airlines adding doors all of a sudden in business class, they should innovate not steal ideas. Whenever there is a great idea, PTV, inflight internet, live tv there will always be a first airline and other airlines will copy and add these amenities that is a good thing overall for passengers.
Now lets talk about things out of place, Singapore airport has global food offerings, should they just confine themselves to Singaporean options to not be out of place? They currently have a Monet exhibition, what does that have to do with Singapore? They have retail concepts from around the world, in fact shops that exist in other airports too, why dont they stick to Singaporean brands? There is cactus garden at the airport with "100 species of cacti and arid plants from the deserts and dry areas of Asia, Africa and America." I don't associate arid environments with Singapore. I don't consider any of these things an issue, Changi is a global hub catering to a global and diverse set of passengers.

Are you offended by a renaissance italian painting (Mona Lisa) being the star attraction at a French museum (Louvre), should the Met Museum in New York close down their Egyptian section as that is in a place it doesn't belong. How about the tropical plants at Kew Gardens in London, what is a tropical garden doing at 51 degrees north? oh wait those are indoor tropical gardens so Singapore outright stole that idea.
Now back to Hamad Airport. It doesn't have a tropical theme, the theme is abstract nautical due to its setting by the water and this was applied in some elements like the wavy roof. The new indoor garden is an amenity and not the theme of the airport, it allows people who are on long transits to enjoy natural light and greenery. It is an amenity just like the extensive retail (local and international brands), the food offerings (local and international cuisine), the lounges, the gym, the swimming pool, the airside hotel, museum, the spas, free medical centre and so on. All these things exist in many other airports too. The airport has an large art collection on display too, again from local and international artists and with local themes as well as non-localised themes.
Going back to the garden it being out of place, a couple of points:
1. that is not the only place where indoor and outdoor landscaping exist and around most of the airport the theme is more on local plants.


2. You can see here the palm trees, acacia and some local shrubs in this image of the new garden.

3. The desert in Qatar is not just sand dunes, there are meadows in the desert and mangrove forests with some of the local plants used in that garden.




