Moderators: richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
trexel94 wrote:It could always be NK, B6 or even Avelo.
izbtmnhd wrote:If it is BA, that’s quite a blow for CMH getting TATL in the medium term with BA at PIT/CVG and EI at CLE.
DeltaRules wrote:Isn't it a bit late for TATL announcements? Those seem to be Sept-Oct reveals for the next Summer.izbtmnhd wrote:If it is BA, that’s quite a blow for CMH getting TATL in the medium term with BA at PIT/CVG and EI at CLE.
It'd be a blow for both CMH, but perhaps bigger for IND, which was explicitly named at one point as on BA's radar.
DeltaRules wrote:Isn't it a bit late for TATL announcements? Those seem to be Sept-Oct reveals for the next Summer.izbtmnhd wrote:If it is BA, that’s quite a blow for CMH getting TATL in the medium term with BA at PIT/CVG and EI at CLE.
It'd be a blow for both CMH, but perhaps bigger for IND, which was explicitly named at one point as on BA's radar.
zackary747 wrote:DeltaRules wrote:Isn't it a bit late for TATL announcements? Those seem to be Sept-Oct reveals for the next Summer.izbtmnhd wrote:If it is BA, that’s quite a blow for CMH getting TATL in the medium term with BA at PIT/CVG and EI at CLE.
It'd be a blow for both CMH, but perhaps bigger for IND, which was explicitly named at one point as on BA's radar.
As an IND traveler, I will be furious if CVG were to get BA before IND. The MCI people should be furious as well.
ANA787 wrote:If it’s BA, DL will bolt from CVG-CDG.
DeltaRules wrote:ANA787 wrote:If it’s BA, DL will bolt from CVG-CDG.
Shades of PIT after BA came to town.
DeltaRules wrote:ANA787 wrote:If it’s BA, DL will bolt from CVG-CDG.
Shades of PIT after BA came to town.
strangeplanes wrote:How quickly does Delta drop the route after BA announces? That 767-400 would be much better used on competition-free Kansas City or Indianapolis.
zackary747 wrote:DeltaRules wrote:Isn't it a bit late for TATL announcements? Those seem to be Sept-Oct reveals for the next Summer.izbtmnhd wrote:If it is BA, that’s quite a blow for CMH getting TATL in the medium term with BA at PIT/CVG and EI at CLE.
It'd be a blow for both CMH, but perhaps bigger for IND, which was explicitly named at one point as on BA's radar.
As an IND traveler, I will be furious if CVG were to get BA before IND. The MCI people should be furious as well.
trexel94 wrote:zackary747 wrote:DeltaRules wrote:Isn't it a bit late for TATL announcements? Those seem to be Sept-Oct reveals for the next Summer.
It'd be a blow for both CMH, but perhaps bigger for IND, which was explicitly named at one point as on BA's radar.
As an IND traveler, I will be furious if CVG were to get BA before IND. The MCI people should be furious as well.
We're already b*tching in KC. IND and MCI are about to learn a valuable lesson. Incentives only go so far, there are only so many cities that make sense to add, airlines prefer proven markets and we're reaching the bottom of the barrel in terms of airlines adding new long haul routes. Where's the cutoff?
I feel like the window is closing on these two cities. BA was likely their best hope. DL seems to have lost interest in point-to-point routes, Aer Lingus/Icelandair are too small, Condor is giving up on mid-sized markets and LH is too good for them. Both offer new terminals, good PDEW, an incentives slush fund and still no bites. Pity
trexel94 wrote:zackary747 wrote:DeltaRules wrote:Isn't it a bit late for TATL announcements? Those seem to be Sept-Oct reveals for the next Summer.
It'd be a blow for both CMH, but perhaps bigger for IND, which was explicitly named at one point as on BA's radar.
As an IND traveler, I will be furious if CVG were to get BA before IND. The MCI people should be furious as well.
We're already b*tching in KC. IND and MCI are about to learn a valuable lesson. Incentives only go so far, there are only so many cities that make sense to add, airlines prefer proven markets and we're reaching the bottom of the barrel in terms of airlines adding new long haul routes. Where's the cutoff?
I feel like the window is closing on these two cities. BA was likely their best hope. DL seems to have lost interest in point-to-point routes, Aer Lingus/Icelandair are too small, Condor is giving up on mid-sized markets and LH is too good for them. Both offer new terminals, good PDEW, an incentives slush fund and still no bites. Pity
a320flyer wrote:DeltaRules wrote:ANA787 wrote:If it’s BA, DL will bolt from CVG-CDG.
Shades of PIT after BA came to town.strangeplanes wrote:How quickly does Delta drop the route after BA announces? That 767-400 would be much better used on competition-free Kansas City or Indianapolis.
DL made no response to WW flying CVG-KEF, I don’t see them making much, if any, reaction to a possible entrance by BA. CDG overflies LHR, so only onward connections will compete against each other. DL is still firmly entrenched in the CVG market, definitely smaller than they were before COVID, but that’s mostly due to the CRJs, mainline is practically identical.
SkyTeam has much more presence than OneWorld at CVG. Even with the RDU add, AA lags behind in its service at CVG compared to IND/CMH. It would be a bold move, but there’s not reason they couldn’t coexist.
RDRogel wrote:Why not an Asian airline(like CX) can fly to CVG?
DeltaRules wrote:ANA787 wrote:If it’s BA, DL will bolt from CVG-CDG.
Shades of PIT after BA came to town.
777Mech wrote:DeltaRules wrote:ANA787 wrote:If it’s BA, DL will bolt from CVG-CDG.
Shades of PIT after BA came to town.
That route was subsidized, and once they gave the subsides to BA, DL split. This is a totally different situation.
av8orwalk wrote:Could this have been a typo and was actually the Paris (CDG) announcement by JetBlue?
Flaps wrote:777Mech wrote:DeltaRules wrote:
Shades of PIT after BA came to town.
That route was subsidized, and once they gave the subsides to BA, DL split. This is a totally different situation.
PIT-CDG was self-sustaining long before BA came to town. I absolutely expect DL to drop CVG-CDG if BA comes to CVG.
777Mech wrote:Flaps wrote:777Mech wrote:
That route was subsidized, and once they gave the subsides to BA, DL split. This is a totally different situation.
PIT-CDG was self-sustaining long before BA came to town. I absolutely expect DL to drop CVG-CDG if BA comes to CVG.
Once the subsidy ran out it was reduced to summer seasonal, and then the airport authority gave a subsidy for BA to come in, and that's when they pulled the plug totally.
CVGspottekass wrote:777Mech wrote:Flaps wrote:
PIT-CDG was self-sustaining long before BA came to town. I absolutely expect DL to drop CVG-CDG if BA comes to CVG.
Once the subsidy ran out it was reduced to summer seasonal, and then the airport authority gave a subsidy for BA to come in, and that's when they pulled the plug totally.
Pittsburgh’s Paris flight didn't preform as well as Cincinnati’s though to start with.
FlyingElvii wrote:CVGspottekass wrote:777Mech wrote:
CVG has a biz connection to France. Proctor and Gamble used to fill 50% or more of that plane.
AirForceAM wrote:It’s BA service to LHR, starting 5-June on 787. It’ll be 5x/week in summer and 4x/week in winter. The announcement event will be live-streamed on Facebook in about an hour from now.
SLCaviation wrote:Im 90% sure the route is LHR on BA and 100% sure DL will drop CDG
N292UX wrote:SLCaviation wrote:Im 90% sure the route is LHR on BA and 100% sure DL will drop CDG
DL has a bunch of corporate contracts on the CDG flight and the pax payload may not be the most important part of the plane - often is what is being carried underneath in the cargo hold.
Not to mention they just upgauged the route to a 764.
RDRogel wrote:Why not an Asian airline(like CX) can fly to CVG?
AirForceAM wrote:It’s BA service to LHR, starting 5-June on 787. It’ll be 5x/week in summer and 4x/week in winter. The announcement event will be live-streamed on Facebook in about an hour from now.
SLCaviation wrote:N292UX wrote:SLCaviation wrote:Im 90% sure the route is LHR on BA and 100% sure DL will drop CDG
DL has a bunch of corporate contracts on the CDG flight and the pax payload may not be the most important part of the plane - often is what is being carried underneath in the cargo hold.
Not to mention they just upgauged the route to a 764.
That was all before BA… now everything is different
DeltaRules wrote:Isn't it a bit late for TATL announcements? Those seem to be Sept-Oct reveals for the next Summer.izbtmnhd wrote:If it is BA, that’s quite a blow for CMH getting TATL in the medium term with BA at PIT/CVG and EI at CLE.
It'd be a blow for both CMH, but perhaps bigger for IND, which was explicitly named at one point as on BA's radar.
PSU.DTW.SCE wrote:I don't get the assertion that DL is now suddenly going to pack-up and abandon the CVG-CDG route simply because a new competitor, with BA is starting CVG-LHR.
A.net tends to overreact that all the sudden a new competitor is going to waltz and suddenly steal all the marketshare.
Could DL drop CVG-CDG at some point? Sure anything is possible.
However DL still has a portfolio of non-hub routes out of CVG and still has a share of loyalty in the market.
The BA CVG-LHR route is competing to pull traffic that is connecting to LHR over other hubs.
There is traffic on AA connecting over ORD, PHL, JFK, CLT.
Not to mention UA and DL traffic connecting over their hubs.
There is enough onward TATL / European demand from the CVG region to support both flights.