Sorry - there will not be 200,000 people crowding roads to see the A380 make its first flight. I am not denying that there will be interest, but doubtfully this amount of interest.
The Concorde is a remarkable aircraft and will take its rightful place in history as the aircraft that brought supersonic travel to the world. Granted, you had to be wealthy to afford to do it (even once) but it was there.
I don't think even the most staunch Concorde lover will disagree if you say that the 747 had a bigger impact on air travel than Concorde, because one was a commercial success and the other was not. The 747 and other widebodies helped make air travel affordable to a huge segment of the world's population. The Concorde cannot make such a claim.
But at the end of the day, there is perhaps no aircraft in history that has ever captured the imagination of the general public like Concorde has. Maybe it was the mystique or the exclusivity, maybe it was because it looked nothing like anything else in the sky. Has there ever been a more photogenic aircraft?
A piece of aviation history passed today, and as much as I did not want to add to a thread started by Kl777jfk, because typically his threads are useless and ridiculous, I also felt somewhat moved by the retirement of the SST. It was a piece of history that is irreplaceable, and in much the same way as baseball fans will mourn Roger Clemens' retirement, myself and others will feel a loss that Concorde is no longer gracing the skies. Sure, commercial aviation and baseball will go on, but they will be different now. As I have said before in another post, I think the world took a technological step backwards today.
As
JFK Ground Control said to Capt. Bannister and Speedbird 002 this morning: "you will be missed here".