Moderators: jsumali2, richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR

 
WNfan
Topic Author
Posts: 198
Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2003 4:27 am

Britney Spears Stalker Added To No-fly List

Fri Oct 24, 2003 8:58 pm

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=638&e=1&u=/nm/20031024/en_nm/people_britney_dc

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - A Japanese businessman who was ordered to stay away from Britney Spears sued the pop star in Los Angeles federal court on Thursday, accusing her security guards of brandishing a gun at him and causing "extreme emotional distress."

Masahiko Shizawa, a 43-year-old software entrepreneur from Yokohama, says Spears' guards confronted him on a public street at gunpoint and demanded that he leave the area.

Shizawa seeks unspecified damages from Spears.

Representatives for Spears could not be reached for comment.

At an Oct. 7 hearing, a state judge ordered Shizawa not to contact the entertainer and to stay at least 300 yards from her for three years. According to testimony from that hearing, Shizawa was placed on the federal "no-fly list" as a potential threat to Spears.

In granting her request for a temporary restraining order, Judge Alan Haber determined that Shizawa "engaged in a pattern of harassment and stalking" Spears for more than a year.




While I certainly do not condone stalking, this story raises some questions:

1) Was Shizawa placed on the no-fly list because Spears flies around the country frequently, and they could have a chance encounter aboard an aircraft? I'm guessing yes. If so, is this common in stalker cases?

2) Would Shizawa have been added to the federal no-fly list prior to September 2001? Was there a federal no-fly list prior to enactment of the Patriot Act?

3) Is it right to place "ordinary" stalkers like Shizawa on a no-fly list? If the no-fly list is designed to prevent future terrorist attacks, should it be used in this case? There are many examples of the Patriot Act being used by law enforcement officials for non-terrorism-related activities, and this seems to be one of them.

Thoughts?
 
WNfan
Topic Author
Posts: 198
Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2003 4:27 am

RE: Britney Spears Stalker Added To No-fly List

Sat Oct 25, 2003 5:19 am

Hmm, over eight hours since I created this topic and not one response. I thought it was a good esoteric subject for discussion.

Maybe I should have made the title of the thread "Airbus is better than Boeing".
 
RickB
Posts: 807
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 3:11 am

RE: Britney Spears Stalker Added To No-fly List

Sat Oct 25, 2003 5:21 am

WNFan,

Nah - today you should of just called it 'Britney Spears stalks Concorde' - hundreds of posts that way  Wink/being sarcastic

RickB
 
AM
Posts: 602
Joined: Sat Oct 02, 1999 8:49 am

RE: Britney Spears Stalker Added To No-fly List

Sat Oct 25, 2003 5:29 am

WNfan, I agree with you, this topic may have been popular on a normal day... but it's all about Concorde now.

Anyway, there's better news about Britney Spears, like this one:

http://www.esquire.com
"... for there you have been and there you will long to return."
 
User avatar
Richard28
Posts: 2751
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2003 5:42 am

RE: Britney Spears Stalker Added To No-fly List

Sat Oct 25, 2003 7:48 am

I'll add my two cents - as it does raise important questions.

1) if you can ban one type of criminal from flying, then what are the reasons for not banning other criminals eg arsonists, rapists, murderers, pick pocketers - where does it end?

2) I'm English, so don't know much about this, but does this not evade a constitutional right to freedom of movement in the US? (I'm sure the European court of human rights would take issue with this).

3) what are the chances of him & britney being on the same flight? would not an exclusion order be more applicable, with him having to declare this order to the airline before he flies, so they can decide whether to accept him or not (or later block his reservation) if Britney should happen to be on the same flight?

It does seem a bit like "big brother" to me (in the Orwellian sense).

Rich.
 
Okie
Posts: 4177
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2003 11:30 am

RE: Britney Spears Stalker Added To No-fly List

Sat Oct 25, 2003 7:54 am

I bought my daugher a Bratney Spears doll but they did not have any Double "D" batteries.
 
bobrayner
Posts: 2038
Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2003 8:03 am

RE: Britney Spears Stalker Added To No-fly List

Sat Oct 25, 2003 11:21 am

Seems strange. Are there any other details that the nexs article might have glossed over, that would justify this?

Why not ban him from all music stores, just in case she's doing a signing, &c?
Cunning linguist

Popular Searches On Airliners.net

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos