|Quoting Glareskin (Thread starter):|
KLM wouldn't be able to fill it completely and therefore Boeings 747 is the better option for KLM. KLM doubts if all the A380 customer's plans to install the luxury will be successful. Witsenboer says that the first 747's also had a bar in the upperdeck, but this option has dissapeared in the years.
The first and last sentence contradict. As if when the 747 had growth (discovered in hindsight) to occupy the remainder of the plane, that purchasing an A380 for those cheaper op costs in the future makes no sense? What, no future growth?
The middle sentence sounds like an opinion and we should not consider it worth more than what it is (precieved to be).