Moderators: jsumali2, richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
Quoting Jepstein (Thread starter): What are your thoughts? |
Quoting Abba (Reply 3): Could they be sound at sleep? |
Quoting BayAreaPilot (Reply 5): Posts like this are why some UA pilots don't turn it on. |
Quoting [email protected] (Reply 7): So much jargon and very technical terms are used over ATC frequencies that most of the traveling public wouldn't dare to understand. Little mistakes are made constantly, but are corrected quickly by the pilot or controller. Channel 9 opens up a can of worms and I'm really surprised that United pilots choose to turn it on. |
Quoting RoseFlyer (Reply 1): There is a good chance that ATC will be telling the pilots to squawk 7600 as they are going to presume that something is wrong. |
Quoting OPNLguy (Reply 2): It's really no big deal. If the ATC facility can't raise the aircraft, they call us (dispatch) and the flight's dispatcher will send the flight an ACARS message with the proper frequency for ATC contact. |
Quoting RDUDDJI (Reply 15): A WN friend told me a few years ago that WN didn't have ACARS? A cost savings thing...does WN have ACARS now? |
Quoting MarshalN (Reply 14): On my recent flight on UA I heard other pilots missed calls -- I just remember the ATC calling that plane three or four times before that pilot responded. |
Quoting Jepstein (Thread starter): What are your thoughts? |
Quoting BayAreaPilot (Reply 5): If you're going to post Channel 9 anecdotes, please don't post the flight number and date. Posts like this are why some UA pilots don't turn it on. |
Quoting [email protected] (Reply 7): What if you heard "United 181, cleared to land runway 9, braking action reported poor by a 767." Would you second guess the pilots, wondering why in the hell their going to attempt to land on an ice covered runway when they know they're going to have very little traction when they touch down? Of course you would. You probably didn't know that the airplane can still stop safely and maintain directional control in a variety of ways. |
Quoting N234NW (Reply 11): Suddenly, a very hurried and out of breath controller chimed in. Who knows what he might have been distracted with. . |
Quoting RoseFlyer (Reply 19): I thought that if braking conditions are reported "poor" then it is not suitable to land on that runway and the plane should divert. When they say braking conditions are poor, that really means bad, and that diverting to an alternate or waiting on a better runway condition is the best course of action. Yes an airplane can maintain directional control via the rudder etc, but reverse thrust isn't going to stop you. |
Quoting OPNLguy (Reply 20): I think you're confusing "POOR" braking action with "NIL" the latter of which pretty much shuts things down, and causes diversions. One can still have diversions with "POOR" braking action, but usually due to the associated crosswind limitations (5 kts, down from the usual 10 kts) being exceeded. The list of braking actions is: GOOD FAIR POOR NIL |
Quoting Pilottim747 (Reply 10): ATC will never assign 7600. |