Moderators: jsumali2, richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
Quoting Dreamflight767 (Reply 4): |
Quoting Dreamflight767 (Reply 4): Isn't JAL canceling service from NGO to LAX too? |
Quoting Trvlr (Reply 5): I believe the consensus is still that NGO will still receive a large increase in service as a result of the new airport. |
Quoting Centrair (Reply 1): Canada needs better connecting service for it to work. It connects with ANA well, but not with other Star Alliance partners |
Quoting Dreamflight767 (Reply 4): Isn't JAL canceling service from NGO to LAX too? |
Quoting B742 (Reply 8): I wish NGO would get more service from Europe |
Quoting Fly2YYZ (Reply 7): I completely agree with this! When I worked at an AC affiliate, it was hard to have passengers connecting through NRT and HKG either because the flights were completely full, taxes were steep etc. Flying though other AC destinations were a hassle like ICN and China. NGO could be a better connecting airport for Canadians. It could provide connecting opportunities throughout Southeast Asia via *A carriers. |
Quoting B742 (Reply 8): Quoting Dreamflight767 (Reply 4): Isn't JAL canceling service from NGO to LAX too? Your probably thinking of KIX-LAX, which JAL is dropping I wish NGO would get more service from Europe Rob! |