Moderators: jsumali2, richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
Quoting Horus (Reply 2): I'm sure this has been discussed several times before but why have SK chosen to order 2 A319s when they have sizable fleet of the similarly sized B73G? |
Quoting Husky (Thread starter): Check this link to get a sneak preview of the livery: |
Quoting TriStar500 (Reply 10):
Would have made more sense to paint an MD-80 this way, since its ancestor, the DC-9, carried this livery. |
Quoting TriStar500 (Reply 10): Would have made more sense to paint an MD-80 this way, since its ancestor, the DC-9, carried this livery. |
Quoting Viscount630 (Reply 14): I think it looks excellent on the A319 - MUCH better than the current livery which I always thought looked like it was designed by a commitee who's members couldn't quite agree on what they wanted. |
Quoting AirPacific747 (Reply 17): I think it looks excellent on the A319 - MUCH better than the current livery which I always thought looked like it was designed by a commitee who's members couldn't quite agree on what they wanted. |
Quoting LN-KGL (Reply 19): To conclude - I hope SAS Denmark will never use this awfull mixed 3D-Aviation design. If they do, I will stop using SAS imediately - and I hope a lot of you too will do the same! |
Quoting AirPacific747 (Reply 23): should be the A340 then.. would look good on a 4 engined aircraft |