Moderators: jsumali2, richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
Quoting 764 (Thread starter): I mean, a flight leaving NYC at 08:00 could easily arrive in FRA by 21:30, |
Quoting CALPSAFltSkeds (Reply 6): Daylight flights eastbound require more aircraft. Arriving at 2000 or later requires an overnight (because no one wants to leave that late going west), which means the morning departure westbound gets into the US after the daylight departure eastbound has departed. |
Quoting AuroraLives (Reply 7): Cool... After years of lurking... I actually made a post |
Quoting KC135TopBoom (Reply 1): LH has an A-340 (occasionally an A-330, formerly a B-747-200) daily that flys from DFW to FRA, departing DFW at 1500L (2100Z). It should arrive at FRA around 0700Z the next morning. |
Quoting Someone83 (Reply 2): The problem here is then the reduced possibilities of connections opportunities. Is not that many flights that leaves FRA after 22:30. LHR is easier as it is 1 hr less flight time and 1 hr less time zone compared to Continental Europe, hence making a daylight flight from the US more do able |
Quoting Commavia (Reply 9): if any other U.S.-Europe route could possibly support a daylight eastbound, it would be JFK-CDG. |
Quoting Commavia (Reply 9): I'm not so sure that a daylight JFK-CDG and/or JFK-FRA will never work: I think a premium-configured 757 could work in both markets, but it would be a stretch. |
Quoting Commavia (Reply 11): CDG is a larger market for the U.S., and generates significantly more O&D demand - from JFK, New York, and elsewhere - than FRA. |
Quoting N1120A (Reply 12): I see FRA as generating more business demand, which is often the focus of daylight flights. |