Moderators: jsumali2, richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
Quoting Beefstew25 (Reply 3): Here is another funny one. Any info on this? |
Quoting Philcresci (Reply 2): I figured that...I fly on this flight alot and was just a bit curious. They still havent departed yet though. Well see, hopefully all is okay. |
Quoting IAHFLYR (Reply 4): The flight track was needed to lose altitude for a descent into IAH for a medical diversion. |
Quoting OPNLguy (Reply 7): operationally, that doesn't make much sense... It doesn't take that long to get down, and at the point which their original FLL-LAS route changed (around JAN), BTR, JAN, and MSY could have all served as landing points. What's not known are what the actual medical sitiation and condition of the pax (i.e. the level of "urgency"). A long FLL-LAS flight would have most likely had them landing at JAN, BTR, or MSY over max structural landing weight (MLW) whereas landing at IAH (being further) perhaps did not. Maybe those turns NE of IAH were to get that last bit of fuel burned off to make MLW at IAH. |
Quoting OPNLguy (Reply 7): their original FLL-LAS route changed |
Quoting Juventus (Reply 10): Didn't a DL 777 (ATL-LAX) divert to ABQ about a month ago for the same reason???? |
Quoting Juventus (Reply 10): Didn't a DL 777 (ATL-LAX) divert to ABQ about a month ago for the same reason???? |
Quoting Tom in NO (Reply 9): I gotta ask: an FLL-LAS nonstop that's filed via MEI and LIT? Were the enroute winds or other weather that bad where they had to file that far north? I'd figure a bit more of an LEV-LCH/AEX-MAF-FLG-PGS-type routing... |
Quoting OPNLguy (Reply 15): Best winds routes change from day-to-day due to the jet stream. |
Quoting Tom in NO (Reply 16): Winds up north must've been so much lighter as to make what amounted to a 200-mile detour advantageous. |