Moderators: jsumali2, richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
Quoting cabso1 (Reply 5): Reports are that this was the inaugural flight |
Quoting liquidair (Reply 7): First images show a gruesome scene. |
Quoting mjabbasi (Reply 8): My friend who works at KHI airport saw it take off and says it was AP-BKD. Lightening strike is being blamed as the cause of the crash. |
Quoting Tobias2702 (Reply 4): The a/c posted above (AP-BEP) cannot be the frame that crashed, as it was sold to Merpati and later scrapped. |
Quoting T8KE0FF (Reply 12): What sad news. How come there were 9 crew onboard?! That's quite a lot for a domestic hop on a 732, is it not? |
Quoting KHI747 (Reply 10): Can lightening itself solely bring down an aircraft? |
Quoting KHI747 (Reply 10): Can lightening itself solely bring down an aircraft? |
Quoting cbphoto (Reply 14): In short, no lightning can't really bring down an aircraft! They are designed to take the lightning strike and discharge the electricity out the static wicks on the wings and tail. |
Quoting cbphoto (Reply 14): Well, if it was the inaugural flight, as suggested above, then their could very well have been some crew training on the flight! The flight deck might have had some training personal in the jumpseats and their might have been extra flight attendants on board doing training as well! |
Quoting nema (Reply 15): Whats more the BBC news article states that Last July, an Airbus A321 crashed as it was about to land in Islamabad, killing all 152 people on board. Same approach? |
Quoting T8KE0FF (Reply 17): The last I'm aware of was a Colombia flight in 2010 (note: I'm going from memory). |
Quoting rj777 (Reply 21): Ok, now we're getting conflicting reports as to the type of reports involved: http://www.cnn.com/2012/04/20/world/...hp_t3 |
Quoting lightsaber (Reply 16): Lightning shouldn't be able to bring down an aircraft with a fully functioning lightning protection system. If there were few broken grounding wires (there is always redundancy). Also, untreated corrosion can make the system's effectiveness too low to save the airframe or electronics. About every 3 to 5 years, an airframe without proper maintenance oversight is lost to lightning. The last I'm aware of was a Colombia flight in 2010 (note: I'm going from memory). Should this happen? Was it definitively the cause of the crash? However, considering the current regulatory environment in Pakistan, should it be suspected? |
Quoting WestJet747 (Reply 23): Bhoja Air has posted a passenger list on their home page encouraging family members to contact given emergency numbers, which I have never seen an airline do before. |
Quoting WestJet747 (Reply 23): Bhoja Air has posted a passenger list on their home page encouraging family members to contact given emergency numbers, which I have never seen an airline do before. It seems that there are 121 passengers on the list, as opposed to the previously reported 118. Very sad. |
Quoting LXa332 (Reply 19): Quoting mjabbasi (Reply 8): My friend who works at KHI airport saw it take off and says it was AP-BKD. AV Herald is reporting AP-BKC |
Quoting nema (Reply 15): The same approach? |
Quoting ukair (Reply 30): Why did the flight crew try to land in these conditions? If the conditions where below minimums they should have diverted to a safer airport. |
Quoting Aviational (Reply 36): Eye witnesses around the area are saying that lightning struck the aircraft and it exploded right away ! |
Quoting 76er (Reply 41): Which is what eyewitnesses report at just about every crash... |
Quoting francoflier (Reply 40): I've found this link of a local forum where someone posted miscellaneous pics of Bhoja Air and it's crew in better days. I hesitated in posting it as it also contains a list of the passengers/victims... http://www.pakwheels.com/forums/airc...ash-4 |
Quoting sankaps (Reply 42): |
Quoting cabso1 (Reply 5): Reports are that this was the inaugural flight and that there are no survivors. |
Quoting mjabbasi (Reply 8): My friend who works at KHI airport saw it take off and says it was AP-BKD. |
Quoting rj777 (Reply 21): The PRINT article is referencing a 737-200, but the VIDEO is saying an Airbus A321. Same news outlet. " |
Quoting RayChuang (Reply 46): It appears that the crash was probably caused by the plane flying into a microburst during that thunderstorm |