|Quoting Kaiarahi (Reply 71):|
Careful about the self-stroking - it can lead to penis elbow. BTW, the FAA focus is just the batteries, not the 57 other things you allege is wrong with the aircraft.
Self stroking? Sometimes people need to be told that they were wrong so that they can evaluate their past actions, I personally still don't think that you get it.
So lets recap:
I said - 787 batteries were not in compliance with the FAA certification special condition related to LI-ion batteries, I also posted the relevant special condition.
FAA said - “In addition to the continuing review of the aircraft’s design, manufacture and assembly, the agency also will validate that 787 batteries and the battery system on the aircraft are in compliance with the special condition the agency issued as part of the aircraft’s certification."
So if you want to call that stroking, call it what you want, I like to call it being right and proved right despite the literally 100's of posts calling me out personally as an Airbus supporting conspiracy theorist. I would like to think that some of these posters will take a good hard look at themselves but I really doubt that they will.