Moderators: jsumali2, richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
Quoting DeltaB717 (Reply 251): The GE for A330 surprises me! Can their current A330s be re-engined for commonality, is that doable? Or they're just prepapred to operate both? |
Quoting seabosdca (Reply 252): They operate 767s with differing engine types and several other heterogeneous subfleets, so I think operating different types in their A330 fleet will be OK with them. |
Quoting DeltaB717 (Reply 251): The GE for A330 surprises me! Can their current A330s be re-engined for commonality, is that doable? Or they're just prepapred to operate both? |
Quoting MIflyer12 (Reply 192): Have you actually flown one? Do you have any understanding as to how they're configured? The 764 cabins are very current; lie-flats with aisle access in Business, AVOD and USB power throughout. |
Quoting Stitch (Reply 188): I highly doubt passengers at the gate are using smartphones and tablets to look up ship numbers on airfleets.net to see how old the plane they are flying on is. The condition and style of the interior is what maters to customers which is why airlines around the world do them rather then replace the airframe with a new plane with a new interior every five to ten years. |
Quoting PPVRA (Reply 255): Do you think DL will upgrade the interiors once again? Delta did a thorough but minimalist retrofit, I don't see them doing another one, and that means these 767s will be showing their age in 5-10 years. |
Quoting 1337Delta764 (Reply 249): |
Quoting 1337Delta764 (Reply 157): Because it is something that WILL NOT HAPPEN under any circumstance. This seems to be another Mayan calendar apocalypse scam in the making. |
Quoting spink (Reply 198): DL is an intensely capex focused company in stark contrast to most other airlines which are much more opex focused. They can get away with this in some part because of their network (there are a LOT of 1-2 hour or less flights out of ATL) and their maintenance capabilities. Its also why they own such a large portion of their fleet compared to many other airlines. DL plans on roughly 30 year life cycles for their frames, and for a 30 year life cycle, owning is significantly cheaper than leasing. Some are wondering why they didn't order any NEOs/MAXs but the reality is both command a premium and delta won't pay a premium. |
Quoting 1337Delta764 (Reply 217): No, but it would be very stupid of DL to get rid of them prematurely if they serve a legitimate purpose in the DL fleet. They make money for DL, and is more efficient than the 763ER and A332 on the routes that it serves (it is DL's second most efficient widebody in terms of CASM, only behind the A333). No wonder DL did not order the A332 instead of the A333; the A332 was never in the run in this recent order since it is a less efficient aircraft. Why would DL get rid of a such a fuel-efficient aircraft prematurely? |
Quoting IADCA (Reply 258): Perhaps if it wasn't premature? As in, the NPV of the assets to the company was less than someone else would pay for them? I realize this won't generate a happy response from you, but one significant reason the 764 is likely to stick around DL and UA until retirement is that there just aren't many prospective buyers for them, which depresses their market value and functionally reduces the decision with them to flying them versus parking them. They're good aircraft. Nobody says they're not, but it's pretty funny to see the lengths you're going to in an attempt to create your own reality. You're fighting a straw man, and actually fairly hilariously unsuccessfully. Have you ever seen a bird attack its own reflection? |
Quoting 1337Delta764 (Reply 259): Retiring them in 5-7 years from now before the 763ER is retired is definitely premature. The 764ERs are some of the newest 767s in the DL fleet |
Quoting willzzz88 (Reply 261): Can anyone here give me a summary of the reasons why DL chose GE for the engines versus P&W and RR? Especially RR as I heard RR is the technical leader in terms of performance and range for the A333 (RR engines on a A333 have the MOST range, this maybe a couple of years/months old). Does DL need the extra range from RR engines or does GE provide enough? What about fuel burn? Also is there a range/fuel burn/performance difference between CFM and IAE for the A321's? What engines do AA have on their A321's? |
Quoting willzzz88 (Reply 261): Can anyone here give me a summary of the reasons why DL chose GE for the engines versus P&W and RR? |
Quoting tristan7977 (Reply 263): Delta ordering Airbus, finally?? Congrats, lets hope for the A350, and A320neo eventually. |
Quoting spink (Reply 198): DL is an intensely capex focused company in stark contrast to most other airlines which are much more opex focused. |
Quoting PPVRA (Reply 255): Yes, they are alright. But 5-10 years from now flying against 787s, 777s and A350s? |
Quoting 1337Delta764 (Reply 265): God forbid. Let's hope for the 787, 737MAX, and 777X. |
Quoting EPA001 (Reply 12): Luckily we as A-netters do not make the real decisions in the real world. . |
Quoting texdravid (Reply 185): has some good products, but the 748i debacle, the 788 teething pains, and not getting a real 757 replacement is sad. Having said that, the 333 and 388 as well as 321 aircraft are excellent and Boeing is just another American manufacturing company in slow decline. |
Quoting airbazar (Reply 208): Because Boeing doesn't have anything to offer for delivery in 2015. |