Moderators: jsumali2, richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
Quoting Mah4546 (Reply 1): Yes, it is cheaper labor. |
Quoting skystar767 (Reply 3): How does the Scandinavian labor unions feels about that? |
Quoting usflyguy (Reply 4): What's the pay for US based crews vs ARN/OSL/CPH based crews? |
Quoting skystar767 (Reply 3): How does the Scandinavian labor unions feels about that? |
Quoting DeltaRules (Reply 9): This doesn't surprise me. I was in Seattle at the start of October and saw an Emirates cabin crew hiring event listed on the schedule for my hotel's meeting rooms. |
Quoting AAMDanny (Reply 8): So will these crews be based in FLL LAX and JFK? |
Quoting jonnyclark (Reply 12): I think you'll find their intention is to open bases in the US and also fly internally, that's one of their main goals. |
Quoting jonnyclark (Reply 12): The rumour mill going around the EU pilots right now is they are planning on extending to the US and becoming one of the main low cost carriers both sides of the atlantic |
Quoting UALFAson (Reply 13): Then they might want to rethink their business model. Unfortunately for DY, the U.S. has these pesky cabotage laws, which prevent transport of people and/or goods domestically by a foreign-registered vessel. Doesn't matter whether they're based in the EU or Australia or North Korea. |
Quoting JRadier (Reply 14): Which could be circumvented by doing the same as Virgin, starting up a Norwegian America. Not saying they will (I find that unlikely), but if they wanted they could, just not with a majority share. |
Quoting HELyes (Reply 7): Finnair is doing the same in Spain and also in USA I heard, the Finnish cabin crew union is not happy at all. |
Quoting teme82 (Reply 16): AY got some bad news. They can't hire the staff from US. Because they didn't get the "green card's" for them. Reason is that the local staff is professional enough. |
Quoting HELyes (Reply 17): According to the Finnish MTV3 news it's not a final decision yet but it looks bad for AY, you need a good reason for hiring people outside EU. And bad news for those JFK based American crew who were supposed be on their first AY flight on 1st November. |
Quoting HELyes (Reply 17): According to the Finnish MTV3 news it's not a final decision yet but it looks bad for AY, you need a good reason for hiring people outside EU. And bad news for those JFK based American crew who were supposed be on their first AY flight on 1st November. |
Quoting a318 (Reply 20): Does anyone know how Norwegian is going to staff the flights? Are they putting all Americans on board or are they mixing it with Norwegian crews as well? |
Quoting a318 (Reply 20): They will work for OSM Aviation not Norwegian and pay is salary at $1500 month. No flight benefits, no jumpseat benefits since you dont work for Norwegian |
Quoting a318 (Reply 20): Does anyone know how Norwegian is going to staff the flights? Are they putting all Americans on board or are they mixing it with Norwegian crews as well? I know with Finnair, they are going to staff the JFK flights with 2-3 JFK cabin crew and the remaining 6-8 are going to be Finnish (pending that all goes well with the permits). |
Quoting a318 (Reply 20): I know with Finnair, they are going to staff the JFK flights with 2-3 JFK cabin crew and the remaining 6-8 are going to be Finnish (pending that all goes well with the permits). |
Quoting UALFAson (Reply 13): Then they might want to rethink their business model. Unfortunately for DY, the U.S. has these pesky cabotage laws, which prevent transport of people and/or goods domestically by a foreign-registered vessel. Doesn't matter whether they're based in the EU or Australia or North Korea. |
Quoting 777STL (Reply 26): That doesn't keep DY from setting up a US domestic subsidiary to function as a stand alone airline. It seems incredibly ambitious in this current market, but it is legally doable. |
Quoting A340crew (Reply 19): If you look on the indeed forum there is a thread on the Norwegian Air US Flight Attendants. Apparently they already hired people and are sending them to training this month. They will work for OSM Aviation not Norwegian and pay is salary at $1500 month. No flight benefits, no jumpseat benefits since you dont work for Norwegian, not even zed's or ID90s. New hires were told they will work trips starting and ending in JFK and it will be W type routes through out the Norwegian system. |
Quoting PenPusher (Reply 22): Ah the slippery slope to a new low in terms and conditions. One way to put a stop to this is that the Crew/Cabin Crew must be employed directly by the AOC holder operating the aircraft. Now would the EU/FAA go this way ? |
Quoting toltommy (Reply 27): The unions and other airlines dragged VX thru every thing they could trying to prove VX wasn't US controlled. Eventually they got the certificate. |
Quoting toltommy (Reply 27): Not exactly. A domestic subsidiary can't be majority owned or control by non-domestic interests. They have to be minority partner, IIRC can't control more than 25% of the voting shares. The Norwegian brand name has no value here. |