Moderators: jsumali2, richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
Quoting jelliesR (Reply 308): it's not suicide it's criminal anti-government protest. Direct action. Occupy Wall Street taken to a lunatic extreme. News outlets say he attended the trial 7 hours before taking off. How many people arranged their life to be there, to watch the verdict! he was deeply invested and very angry. IMO of course. It just isn't a simple murder suicide. |
Quoting dandelany (Reply 309): If it was a protest, the protester did a pretty terrible job of communicating their message to anyone whatsoever. |
Quoting Shmendr (Reply 3): "The Australian Maritime Safety Authority (AMSA) shrunk its search field to a 600,000 sq km (230,000 sq mile) corridor, just 3 percent of the estimated 19 million sq km area in the Indian Ocean where the plane could be, based on satellite tracking data." |
Quoting chaseus1 (Reply 2): |
Quoting chaseus1 (Reply 2): I don't think the 9/11 terrorists did their attack to make the United States look stronger. |
Quoting k83713 (Reply 7): And the area is 230000 sq.km. And the ships are just passing by...well, I really want to wish best possible luck, but I mean, oh well...I never really imagined there are such incredibly vast areas of wilderness on the planet. |
Quoting Starlionblue (Reply 10): 230000 square miles - 600000 sq.km. |
Quoting k83713 (Reply 7): I never really imagined there are such incredibly vast areas of wilderness on the planet |
Quoting cbrboy (Reply 12): Quoting k83713 (Reply 7): I never really imagined there are such incredibly vast areas of wilderness on the planet Perhaps this map will help you see how big the Pacific, Indian and Southern Oceans are. The internationally-agreed Australian Search and Rescue Region covers 52.8 million square kilometres - over one-tenth of the earth's surface! |
Quoting Tapir (Reply 1): That's what bothering most Msians. Will they ever get to know the truth if that was the case? |
Quoting kevinkevin (Reply 16): With all the technology in today and they still can't find this plane? |
Quoting icanfly (Reply 18): The one aspect of the hijacking, terrorism and suicide theories that doesn't make sense to me is, why choose the flight to PEK? If the intended destination was Central Asia, a flight to Europe would have been a better choice. If the intended destination was the southern Indian Ocean, the aircraft could have turned south over the Bay of Bengal. In either case the backtrack over the Gulf of Thailand and Malay Peninsula could have been avoided. |
Quoting Starlionblue (Reply 15): I'll grant you that the Australian SSR is huge but that map uses a Mercator projection so it severely distorts area, making it seem increasingly bigger than reality the further you go from the Equator. |
Quoting Tapir (Reply 22): Quoting jelliesR (Reply 17): Not really. Capt Zaharie supposedly is the uncle of his daughter in law. It is common to call even a distant relative as uncle or aunty. |
Quoting k83713 (Reply 23): |
Quoting Starlionblue (Reply 19): Quoting kevinkevin (Reply 16): With all the technology in today and they still can't find this plane? Technology is often severely overrated in these cases. |
Quoting jelliesR (Reply 24): related by marriage is still the extended family. Initially there were denials he was even a member of the party! What are the chances that the same day conviction of a big political figure would be linked only by chance to the PIC of the first major plane hijacking for years? |
Quoting slinky09 (Reply 36): |
Quoting stealthz (Reply 37): And the condescending nature of US media knows no bounds... From http://jalopnik.com/this-is-how-the-...laysia-airli-1545497359/@ericlimer "The US Navy, along with various tidbits from the Australian Navy, the Indian Navy, and the Singaporean Navy, is searching this southern zone. The USS Kidd has been involved for some days but to say "the US Navy, along with various tidbits" is offensive to all the countries and the service people involved. Considering their resources the US is a minor player in this effort |
Quoting smokeybandit (Reply 39): there's nothing wrong with the article you linked. |
Quoting stealthz (Reply 42): |
Quoting stealthz (Reply 37): And the condescending nature of US media knows no bounds... |
Quoting k83713 (Reply 44): Thanks for interesting link indeed. In relation to P-3 it's explained that it looks for metallic parts in the ocean. Modern airplane has in fact very few steel parts, but mainly aluminum and carbon fiber. What's the use then or it's capable to detect Al as well? |
Quoting k83713 (Reply 34): |
Quoting jelliesR (Reply 35): |