Moderators: jsumali2, richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
Quoting Jetblue1965 (Reply 48): Quoting Mah4546 (Reply 47): you would've bet that MIA-NRT comes online earlier than IAH-SCL and would've lost the bet, so don't just look at raw demand figures as of today to judge a route's potential |
Quoting Mah4546 (Reply 51): |
Quoting United1 (Reply 36): You are thinking too linear when it comes to fleet planning. They are parking a few 752s after the summer season as they don't need all the capacity they have during the winter. No point hanging onto aircraft that will be replaced by capacity coming online early next year...the 752s are being replaced on a one for one basis. |
Quoting United1 (Reply 38): There are 26/27 739s being flown by sUA with another 13 coming online this year. As for the F/As I think we have discussed that before and it had something to do with UA not being able to get enough voluntarily furloughs. sUA is overstaffed while sCO was understaffed.... There are also a number of sUA F/As that switched to the sCO side of the house which is flying some of the 752 capacity that was replaced by 739s |
Quoting United1 (Reply 44): UA has had F/As on voluntary furloughs for years....they couldn't get enough to take them this time around or the union blocked it...I can't remember but net net has nothing to do with 752 retirement. BTW UA offered employment to EVERY single F/A who was involuntarily furloughed from sUA at sCO. Not whether they all took it who knows but if they didn't it was their personal choice. http://www.unitedafa.org/news/details.aspx?id=8453 Talk to the F/A union about that one...AFA has been the one holding up progress on a joint contract not UA. |
Quoting quiet1 (Reply 53): What has AFA (not) done to hold up progress? |
Quoting jfkgig (Reply 49): Very disappointing that they apparently will not be adding EWR-GIG this year. Fares on this route were sky high all throughout the Northern Winter -- and quite high even after peak season ended. I would be curious to understand the business rationale for not participating in what is a very profitable oligopoly route for AA and TAM, with the potential advantage of being the only carrier to GIG from EWR. |
Quoting Jetblue1965 (Reply 52): It's your obsession not mine. And you just flip flopped by first claiming market is tiny with no business traffic, then do a 180 and now proclaim it's so strategically important to UA. |
Quoting Jetblue1965 (Reply 52): It's your obsession not mine. |
Quoting Jetblue1965 (Reply 52): Meanwhile you hype MIA-NRT 's potential in every thread you can |
Quoting Jetblue1965 (Reply 14): That's a very diplomatic way to say medium gamble, at the very least. |
Quoting toxtethogrady (Reply 63): Quoting Jetblue1965 (Reply 14): That's a very diplomatic way to say medium gamble, at the very least. I think it says that unlike UA's short-term cut-oriented strategy |