Moderators: jsumali2, richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
Quoting 777stl (Reply 2): The tooling is gone. |
Quoting LPDAL (Reply 1): why isn't the 753 used to hop across the pond? Not enough range? |
Quoting 777stl (Reply 4): Sure, they can rebuild the tooling. The question is whether there's a business case to justify the cost of doing so. |
Quoting TWA772LR (Reply 5): Heavier airframe with the same engines and wings as the 200. Not sure if USA-Iceland is possible with a decent payload, but I suspect that if it was, I think FI would have more than one 753. |
Quoting LPDAL (Reply 3): Is it possible to create another set of tooling at all? They should still have the schematics. |
Quoting LPDAL (Reply 6): I wonder how the A321 is doing in that regard. |
Quoting hOmSaR (Reply 7): You can't alternate between building a 737 and a 757 on the same line. |
Quoting hOmSaR (Reply 7): Sure, it's possible. But why, when there aren't any customers? Besides, as already pointed out, the assembly line is now building 737s, which are selling like hotcakes and are pretty much sold out through the end of the decade. So, Boeing would need a new assembly plant as well, not just the tooling. |
Quoting LPDAL (Reply 8): Yeah, that probably ensures that the 757 won't return to production in the foreseeable future |
Quoting hOmSaR (Reply 7): Sure, it's possible. But why, when there aren't any customers? Besides, as already pointed out, the assembly line is now building 737s, which are selling like hotcakes and are pretty much sold out through the end of the decade. So, Boeing would need a new assembly plant as well, not just the tooling. |
Quoting beeweel15 (Reply 10): The 737-800 might be selling well but the 900 can never replace the 757-200/300 |
Quoting hOmSaR (Reply 9): The 757 won't return to production ever. Some day, there may be a plane with similar size and range capabilities, but it won't be a 757. The 757's days as an in-production frame ended in 2006. There will never be a return, foreseeable or not. |
Quoting beeweel15 (Reply 10): Many airline are holding on to their 757s due to the fact there is no real replacement for the aircraft. |
Quoting LPDAL (Reply 1): I'm guessing they still have some cases of spare parts lying around in a big warehouse up in Washington. I remember reading somewhere that the line has to be "retooled" before it can be used again, and that factor was one of the reasons the line never came back. Last 757 I believe was delivered to FM on November 28th, 2005. Of course, they probably have support and maintenance infrastructure for the birds that need it. |
Quoting LTH (Reply 15): Boeing still has the 757 tooling. |
Quoting kanban (Reply 16): Take John's word loosely.. Boeing has some of the tooling, Spirit has some, vendors have some, however those pieces are related to building spares and repair parts.. They can build a rudder but not a fin, they can not build a wing but can build (or have old suppliers build) flaps, slats, etc. They can mill and form skin panels but not build a new section. Journalists frequently ask simple questions and companies respond in general terms. |
Quoting hOmSaR (Reply 9): The 757 won't return to production ever. Some day, there may be a plane with similar size and range capabilities, but it won't be a 757. |
Quoting TWA772LR (Reply 5): Heavier airframe with the same engines and wings as the 200. Not sure if USA-Iceland is possible with a decent payload, but I suspect that if it was, I think FI would have more than one 753. And that's this armchair engineers $.02 worth for the day! |
Quoting rg787 (Reply 20): I'm shooting in the dark here but maybe it's a possibility |
Quoting rg787 (Reply 20): I'm shooting in the dark here but maybe it's a possibility. |