Moderators: jsumali2, richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR

 
boefan
Posts: 1022
Joined: Tue May 27, 2014 6:33 pm

RE: New Zealand Aviation Thread 148

Sun Oct 26, 2014 4:08 pm

Sorry can someone explain this twitter post please?

http://twitter.com/AIRNZUSA/status/526403578932781057
 
PA515
Posts: 1686
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 6:17 am

RE: New Zealand Aviation Thread 148

Sun Oct 26, 2014 5:25 pm

Quoting boefan (Reply 150):
Sorry can someone explain this twitter post please?

Air NZ 77W ZK-OKQ as NZ1946 AKL-LAX-ORD with the All Blacks rugby team for a game in Chicago.
Arrived LAX about 50 mins ago.

PA515
 
User avatar
sunrisevalley
Posts: 5392
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2004 3:26 am

RE: New Zealand Aviation Thread 148

Sun Oct 26, 2014 8:11 pm

Quoting PA515 (Reply 151):
Air NZ 77W ZK-OKQ as NZ1946 AKL-LAX-ORD with the All Blacks rugby team for a game in Chicago.
Arrived LAX about 50 mins ago.

When does the aircraft return to AKL or does it stay with the team and the fans onto the UK ?
 
PA515
Posts: 1686
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 6:17 am

RE: New Zealand Aviation Thread 148

Sun Oct 26, 2014 8:22 pm

Quoting sunrisevalley (Reply 152):

Believe it returns to LAX to do NZ5 tonight. Left LAX late but intends to arrive ORD on time. Presently 35,000ft / 563 kts and about to cross into Utah.

PA515
 
User avatar
sunrisevalley
Posts: 5392
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2004 3:26 am

RE: New Zealand Aviation Thread 148

Sun Oct 26, 2014 11:12 pm

Quoting PA515 (Reply 153):
Believe it returns to LAX to do NZ5 tonight

so there was no NZ 6 on Sunday.?
 
User avatar
sunrisevalley
Posts: 5392
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2004 3:26 am

RE: New Zealand Aviation Thread 148

Sun Oct 26, 2014 11:25 pm

Quoting PA515 (Reply 153):
Believe it returns to LAX to do NZ5 tonight

Yes shows as NZ6005 scheduled out of ORD at 1905 into LAX 2105.
 
ZK-NBT
Posts: 8105
Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2000 5:42 pm

RE: New Zealand Aviation Thread 148

Sun Oct 26, 2014 11:32 pm

Quoting sunrisevalley (Reply 154):

Correct. I spose they could have scheduled an NZ3/4 but didn't need to.

I wonder what the chances are of the A321LR for NZ realistically it could do PER/DRW/PPT and allow for a full load to CNS and maybe, a standard NEO could do a full load to MEL/RAR etc?
 
User avatar
sunrisevalley
Posts: 5392
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2004 3:26 am

RE: New Zealand Aviation Thread 148

Mon Oct 27, 2014 2:08 am

Quoting ZK-NBT (Reply 156):
I wonder what the chances are of the A321LR for NZ realistically it could do PER/DRW/PPT and allow for a full load to CNS and maybe, a standard NEO could do a full load to MEL/RAR etc?

The A321neo is good for about 10t AKL-PER That is about 100 passengers and a MTOW of 93t. This thing needs to be able to do 18.5 t ( max passenger load ) to be in the running in my view for 7.5hr sectors. The BITRE statistics suggest that the average demand is around 30t. To get 18t the sector length would be a something under 7hrs. PPT -AKL should work . Would need to see a load/range table for the LR version to see what it is good for.
 
Motorhussy
Posts: 3676
Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2000 7:49 am

RE: New Zealand Aviation Thread 148

Mon Oct 27, 2014 6:06 pm

On the A321 front, and its use on Trans-Tasman and other medium haul flights, has NZ intimated or even confirmed whether there will be a premium cabin at the front of the plane? And if so, what will the configuration be?

It appears to me that a Y+ style cabin (as per the new wide-body fleet) would the logical course and provide consistency of product across the fleet.

Would it not be possible to use the Y+ seats from the current 77W fleet once these are replaced by the product used in the 789 and 77E fleets? Although it wouldn't make for true product consistency across the fleet, it would be a differentiator that may add perceived value in the medium haul market.

Regards
MH
 
User avatar
sunrisevalley
Posts: 5392
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2004 3:26 am

RE: New Zealand Aviation Thread 148

Mon Oct 27, 2014 6:38 pm

Quoting motorhussy (Reply 158):
On the A321 front, and its use on Trans-Tasman and other medium haul flights, has NZ intimated or even confirmed whether there will be a premium cabin at the front of the plane? And if so, what will the configuration be?

If the A321 had a premium class added wouldn't it be necessary to do the same with the A320?
 
PA515
Posts: 1686
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 6:17 am

RE: New Zealand Aviation Thread 148

Mon Oct 27, 2014 6:44 pm

Quoting motorhussy (Reply 158):
On the A321 front, and its use on Trans-Tasman and other medium haul flights, has NZ intimated or even confirmed whether there will be a premium cabin at the front of the plane? And if so, what will the configuration be?

There was this: http://ausbt.com.au/air-new-zealand-...irbus-a321neo-trans-tasman-flights

PA515
 
zkncj
Posts: 4368
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 4:57 pm

RE: New Zealand Aviation Thread 148

Mon Oct 27, 2014 7:07 pm

Quoting sunrisevalley (Reply 159):
If the A321 had a premium class added wouldn't it be necessary to do the same with the A320?

Not really the A320NEO would pretty do the same as they are now, flying the low yielding Tasman Flights that support the needed to Business Class (which is most flights outside of AKL).

Where as the A321NEO will be partly used as an 763 replacement on AKL-SYD/MEL, which currently have business class.
 
User avatar
zkojq
Posts: 4737
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 12:42 am

RE: New Zealand Aviation Thread 148

Tue Oct 28, 2014 3:24 am

http://i.imgur.com/QMUBjxz.jpg

9V-SKB operated the first Singapore Air A380 service to Auckland.  
Quoting sunrisevalley (Reply 123):
Draw another at about 3400nm to get some idea of what a westbound range would look like.
Quoting motorhussy (Reply 124):
So, following is a map with both the 3,400nm and 3,900nm ranges plotted, plus the routes to Perth and Denpasar, Bali.

Well there goes most of the routes I suggested.

Quoting A330NZ (Reply 129):
I could see this aircraft being a good fit for the CHC-PER route, perhaps bumping up the summer frequency to 3 weekly, and extending to year-round services

I wonder if PER-ZQN would be viable. I don't think the route would work in the other direction as the runway at ZQN might not be long enough for a close-to-MTOW takeoff in an A321neo. Apparently are other issues with operating A321s around ZQN too.

Quoting PA515 (Reply 135):
Jim Hickey is retiring from TVNZ to run his 'Airspresso' cafes at NPL and ZQN. Didn't realise he had one at ZQN as well. The NPL cafe is an interesting place with photos of his father, other local WW2 pilots, etc. The terminal has a great view.

I seem to remember that he flies a Harvard (or similar). Other than that, I'm not sure why people read the garbage that Rachel Glucina writes. Particularly disappointing that The Herald now seems to give her a double spread every now and again.
 
nirvarma
Posts: 111
Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 11:08 am

RE: New Zealand Aviation Thread 148

Wed Oct 29, 2014 4:01 am

So if im not mistaken (and according to FR24) SQ286 has been delayed in departing and as of right now is on the ground in AKL and assuming that all 3 EK A380s are also on the ground in AKL presently, then there should be 4 A380s on the tarmac at the current time. Can anyone confirm/have pictures?
 
User avatar
aerorobnz
Posts: 8435
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2001 3:43 pm

RE: New Zealand Aviation Thread 148

Wed Oct 29, 2014 5:27 am

Quoting nirvarma (Reply 163):
Can anyone confirm/have pictures?

It is/was the case. It's the best possible thing that can happen on only the secondservice. The airport might actually be forced to respond with development....
 
User avatar
NZ107
Posts: 4946
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 6:51 pm

RE: New Zealand Aviation Thread 148

Wed Oct 29, 2014 5:35 am

Quoting aerorobnz (Reply 164):

It is/was the case. It's the best possible thing that can happen on only the secondservice. The airport might actually be forced to respond with development....

Let's hope so...
 
User avatar
aerorobnz
Posts: 8435
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2001 3:43 pm

RE: New Zealand Aviation Thread 148

Wed Oct 29, 2014 8:54 am

Quoting sunrisevalley (Reply 159):
If the A321 had a premium class added wouldn't it be necessary to do the same with the A320?

As a substitute for the shorthaul 763 to SYD,BNE,MEL, even PPT the A321 can comfortably take a small business cabin, Space plus seats ahead of L2 door and leave the A320 for all Y markets like CNS,TBU,VLI. The split would allow them the option to mix and match flights to configs. eg: NZ101 and NZ709 might have the Business class seats, and NZ703,719,105 the A320 Y Class
 
Motorhussy
Posts: 3676
Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2000 7:49 am

RE: New Zealand Aviation Thread 148

Wed Oct 29, 2014 9:19 am

Love to see an apron pic of AKL with four A380's on the ground.
 
byronicle6
Posts: 550
Joined: Sat Oct 29, 2011 11:38 pm

RE: New Zealand Aviation Thread 148

Wed Oct 29, 2014 10:13 am

Quoting aerorobnz (Reply 166):
NZ101 and NZ709 might have the Business class seats, and NZ703,719,105 the A320 Y Class

I do hope NZ will still regularly be flying the 777/787 trans-tasman. The Premium Economy and regular widebody flights are the reason i continue to use NZ for most of my NZ-Australia flying.
 
User avatar
NZ107
Posts: 4946
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 6:51 pm

RE: New Zealand Aviation Thread 148

Wed Oct 29, 2014 10:37 am

Quoting aerorobnz (Reply 166):
eg: NZ101 and NZ709 might have the Business class seats

If they do, they'd better change the flight number back to NZ107  
 
User avatar
zkojq
Posts: 4737
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 12:42 am

RE: New Zealand Aviation Thread 148

Wed Oct 29, 2014 11:15 am

Some not-so-nice weather around Auckland tonight. Looks like the airport closed for a while? There's two JetConnects, two Virgin Australias and a 787 holding whilst an Air New Zealand A320 (OJB, 726) seems to be diverting to Wellington.

Also in NZ civil aviation news, Martin JetPack has an IPO coming up.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/n...ticle.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11349391

Quoting aerorobnz (Reply 164):
It's the best possible thing that can happen on only the secondservice. The airport might actually be forced to respond with development....

Haha, yeah right.

[Edited 2014-10-29 04:23:51]
 
Gasman
Posts: 2204
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 10:06 am

RE: New Zealand Aviation Thread 148

Fri Oct 31, 2014 2:15 am

So...... I'm off to New York. I have a choice between an NZ/UA combo via LAX and a QF trip via SYD and LAX. It looks like although it's about 6 hours extra traveling time, the QF option is going to nail it because:

- with my two kids, it works out to $1000 cheaper (even though it involves significantly more flight miles)
- I can travel all the way from SYD-JFK on a QF744, which easily beats NZ's 10 abreast 77W followed by a UA757
- It's a daytime flight out of SYD, as opposed to NZ's ubiquitous evening/night departure out of AKL, which resuts in a sleepless night meaning you start your trip exhausted.
- I avoid changing terminals in LAX and enduring a US airline domestic flight.
- The NZ option has me arriving in New York at 2230, whereas QF is the more civilised 1700

So just typing that, it seems like a no brainer. Why NZ refuses to offer late afternoon departures to LAX (they did once) continues to bemuse me. And the $3100 Y airfare, I think is daylight robbery.

Comments?

[Edited 2014-10-30 19:24:29]

[Edited 2014-10-30 19:30:16]
 
User avatar
sunrisevalley
Posts: 5392
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2004 3:26 am

RE: New Zealand Aviation Thread 148

Fri Oct 31, 2014 2:34 am

[

At this time NZ do not offer any premium accommodation out of WLG and CHC to Australia

Quoting gasman (Reply 171):
So just typing that, it seems like a no brainer. Why NZ refuses to offer late afternoon departures to LAX (they did once) continues to bemuse me. And the $3100 Y airfare, I think is daylight robbery.

Comments?

How about HA. Take a stop over for a night in each direction . Y fare round trip to JFK looks about $NZ1900.Add a $130 a sector if you want 36" +- seat pitch.
 
byronicle6
Posts: 550
Joined: Sat Oct 29, 2011 11:38 pm

RE: New Zealand Aviation Thread 148

Fri Oct 31, 2014 2:47 am

Quoting gasman (Reply 171):
- It's a daytime flight out of SYD, as opposed to NZ's ubiquitous evening/night departure out of AKL, which resuts in a sleepless night meaning you start your trip exhausted.

??? I think you'll find the opposite. With an evening departure, you have dinner and you're ready to sleep not long after take off, then wake up after a decent amount of sleep, have breakfast and land at LAX. But with those morning departures from Australia to LAX, which land at 6:00am ish, your not ready to sleep until just a couple of hours prior to landing. Having done both, the evening departures are much better on the body clock.
But i understand your other reasons for choosing QF over NZ/UA.
 
Gasman
Posts: 2204
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 10:06 am

RE: New Zealand Aviation Thread 148

Fri Oct 31, 2014 3:20 am

Quoting byronicle6 (Reply 173):

??? I think you'll find the opposite. With an evening departure, you have dinner and you're ready to sleep not long after take off, then wake up after a decent amount of sleep, have breakfast and land at LAX. But with those morning departures from Australia to LAX, which land at 6:00am ish, your not ready to sleep until just a couple of hours prior to landing. Having done both, the evening departures are much better on the body clock.
But i understand your other reasons for choosing QF over NZ/UA.

Yeah........ I think it's in the eye of beholder. If I have a 2200 departure to LAX, that means I'll be pacing in circles from about 1600 waiting to go to the airport. I almost never sleep well on the flight, even in the premium classes (which this time I'm not in). About 15 years ago NZ did have a late afternoon (I think it was 1600) departure to LAX, which suited me better - for some reason this departure time seemed more conducive to a relaxed trip.
 
User avatar
NZ107
Posts: 4946
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 6:51 pm

RE: New Zealand Aviation Thread 148

Fri Oct 31, 2014 3:55 am

Quoting gasman (Reply 171):

Have you looked at UA all the way? 9 abreast 772s (or 789 if you go via MEL) and decent timing.. Just as long as you make the 9am flight out of AKL; which you might have to do on QF anyway. And no, they're not that bad.. I slept 12 hrs on SYD-LAX in April!
 
Motorhussy
Posts: 3676
Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2000 7:49 am

RE: New Zealand Aviation Thread 148

Fri Oct 31, 2014 4:28 am

Quoting NZ107 (Reply 175):

Or the VA option out of SYD or BNE, and there's the DL option out of SYD? Might get a super decent Y+ fare on Virgin.
 
777ER
Head Moderator
Posts: 10143
Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2003 5:04 pm

RE: New Zealand Aviation Thread 148

Fri Oct 31, 2014 4:56 am

Quoting gasman (Reply 171):
Why NZ refuses to offer late afternoon departures to LAX (they did once) continues to bemuse me. And the $3100 Y airfare, I think is daylight robbery.

NZ are having mid afternoon SFO departures this summer period. I fully agree the fare is robbery because NZ adds a good connection fare onto their fare for UA connections. I now usually book my own UA connections ex LAX/SFO as its way cheaper, but usually book the return leg via NZ to provide security on the return leg in case of missed connections like what happened last time
 
User avatar
zkojq
Posts: 4737
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 12:42 am

RE: New Zealand Aviation Thread 148

Fri Oct 31, 2014 5:16 am

Very sad news from Perth. RIP.  Sad
Quote:
A trail-blazing New Zealand pilot has died after suffering a medical episode minutes after landing a Dreamliner plane full of passengers at an Australian airport.

Ann Barbarich, a pilot with Air New Zealand for 27 years and one of the first women pilots to work for the carrier, is suspected of suffering a brain aneurysm moments after the Air New Zealand flight from Auckland landed in Perth on Sunday.

One of the three other pilots in the cockpit at the time took control of the plane, taxiing it to the gate, while the others went to her aid.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/n...3&objectid=11351337&ref=NZH_FBpage


Also. An update on ZK-OKE's interior retrofit.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/n...ticle.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11349416

Quoting gasman (Reply 171):
And the $3100 Y airfare, I think is daylight robbery.

Well, what do you expect from a monopoly on direct flights to California? Would be nice if Qantas still had an A330 based here. If you want cheap fares to California, Air Tahiti Nui and Fiji Airways are usually competitive. Both have their drawbacks, obviously.

Quoting byronicle6 (Reply 173):
I think you'll find the opposite. With an evening departure, you have dinner and you're ready to sleep not long after take off, then wake up after a decent amount of sleep, have breakfast and land at LAX

  

Quoting motorhussy (Reply 176):
Or the VA option out of SYD or BNE

Probably the best alternative to ANZ in my opinion.

[Edited 2014-10-30 22:17:44]
 
Gasman
Posts: 2204
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 10:06 am

RE: New Zealand Aviation Thread 148

Fri Oct 31, 2014 5:43 am

Quoting ZKOJQ (Reply 178):
Quoting motorhussy (Reply 176):
Or the VA option out of SYD or BNE

Probably the best alternative to ANZ in my opinion.

Perhaps, although there is definite value in having one aircraft/carrier all the way to JFK.

Quoting motorhussy (Reply 176):
Might get a super decent Y+ fare on Virgin.

I looked. Smoking hot $3500 return (as opposed to $2600 Y on QF). BUT because of the connections, the VA option would make the trip even longer still..... and of course Y+ would be only as far as LAX
 
nz2
Posts: 258
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2007 8:38 am

RE: New Zealand Aviation Thread 148

Fri Oct 31, 2014 11:13 pm

I have flown NZs 789 four times now, always the same one being the black original. Last flight was on Wednesday when I did SYD and back same day, we arrived back in AKL during the electrical storm which was very spectacular. Airshow was giving us 130km winds, after circling Albany we headed 100k out into Tasman waiting for the storm to pass.

Anyway, my question is each flight has been a de-rated take off and then after about 2-3 minutes in the air the power comes on along with a more aggressive climb rate. SYD I can imagine this could be a requirement with residential but out of AKL heading west I cant see any call for it. Interested to hear any thoughts, is it just a test program, due to new engines etc? thanks
 
ZKOJH
Posts: 1505
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2004 9:51 am

RE: New Zealand Aviation Thread 148

Sat Nov 01, 2014 8:00 am

"Air NZ wins long running legal battle"

Air New Zealand has won a four year legal battle against Australia's competition watchdog which alleged the airline was guilty of organising fuel and security surcharge price fixing.

In 2010 the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) brought a case before the Australian Federal Court, alleging that between 2000 and 2006 Air New Zealand entered into arrangements or understandings with other international air-cargo carriers that had the effect of fixing the price of a fuel surcharge and a security surcharge applied to air cargo carried by Air New Zealand and other airlines.

Air New Zealand was the 15th airline to face court proceedings alleging price fixing in the air-cargo industry from the ACCC.

The ACCC was seeking declarations, injunctive relief, pecuniary penalties and costs.

http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/indu...-NZ-wins-long-running-legal-battle
 
User avatar
NZ107
Posts: 4946
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 6:51 pm

RE: New Zealand Aviation Thread 148

Sat Nov 01, 2014 9:33 am

Quoting nz2 (Reply 180):

It was pretty cool to see on FR.. Must have been fun to fly that route!

Thunderstorm patterns by ANZ787900, on Flickr
 
dc10s2hnl
Posts: 96
Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 3:21 pm

RE: New Zealand Aviation Thread 148

Sun Nov 02, 2014 10:59 pm

Quoting keen2fly (Reply 138):
MRO service gone with it I am guessing.

Vincent was to start MRO-AKL service with a SF3 in November... the Masterton council was expected to go with Air Chathams but approved Vincent's proposal in August, after a (seemingly sparse-on-details) last-minute presentation by Peter Vincent himself:

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/wairarapa-...cfm?c_id=1503414&objectid=11309275

I'll go out on a limb here and say it seems that due diligence was lacking! The folks in Wairarapa were set on the "flashy" Saab (hah!) versus Chathams' Metro.

Any word if some other party will submit a proposal to pick up the service?
 
nz2
Posts: 258
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2007 8:38 am

RE: New Zealand Aviation Thread 148

Mon Nov 03, 2014 4:50 am

Quoting NZ107 (Reply 182):
It was pretty cool to see on FR.. Must have been fun to fly that route!

It sure was, now I can see why I was a bit disorientated and could not place the street lights (motorway system) correctly. However having been up since 4am the last thing I wanted was a half hour delay.....
 
User avatar
NZ107
Posts: 4946
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 6:51 pm

RE: New Zealand Aviation Thread 148

Mon Nov 03, 2014 5:25 am

Quoting dc10s2hnl (Reply 183):
The folks in Wairarapa were set on the "flashy" Saab (hah!) versus Chathams' Metro.

How about a CV580 then?  
Quoting nz2 (Reply 184):

I wouldn't have expected you to see too much due to cloud/rain around anyway. Did that 270 to line up onto downwind feel like a steep turn?
 
User avatar
zkojq
Posts: 4737
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 12:42 am

RE: New Zealand Aviation Thread 148

Mon Nov 03, 2014 6:50 am

ZK-SUI, which has been operated by Air Atlanta Icelandic for Saudi Arabian for a four years, has been ferried to Goodyear Airport, Arizona. Probably to be scrapped.  http://www.skyliner-aviation.de/regdb.main?LC=nav4&page=3
http://www.planespotters.net/Product...7/24957,ZK-SUI-Air-New-Zealand.php

Quoting nz2 (Reply 180):
always the same one being the black original

The pretty one.  Wink
Quoting NZ107 (Reply 182):

There's was also two other 737s holding over the Tasman. ZK-OKH sat at the end of 23L for about ten minutes and was using its WX radar to direct a smaller aircraft around the storm cell.  

Oh and FR24 should probably change their generic 787 photo.

Quoting nz2 (Reply 180):
Anyway, my question is each flight has been a de-rated take off and then after about 2-3 minutes in the air the power comes on along with a more aggressive climb rate

hmmm. Acceleration height, maybe? Though that should be reached in less than two minutes after takeoff and should be very similar on other big jets, not unique to the 787.

[Edited 2014-11-02 22:51:46]
 
User avatar
sunrisevalley
Posts: 5392
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2004 3:26 am

RE: New Zealand Aviation Thread 148

Mon Nov 03, 2014 2:45 pm

Quoting ZKOJH (Reply 57):
NZ under fire again over domestic route costs!

It is interesting to drill into their latest financial results. Their overall yield was 13.7cents per revenue passenger km. (RPK) International was 10.7c; TT was 11.7c and domestic was 27.9c. System CASK shows as 11c. No split out to match against the broken out RPK's I'm afraid. I would assume the domestic CASK is higher than the system average but by how much is an open question.
 
bonzolab
Posts: 54
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2012 9:38 am

RE: New Zealand Aviation Thread 148

Tue Nov 04, 2014 12:40 am

Quoting ZKOJQ (Reply 186):
There's was also two other 737s holding over the Tasman. ZK-OKH sat at the end of 23L for about ten minutes and was using its WX radar to direct a smaller aircraft around the storm cell.

Great work by the crew!
 
User avatar
LAXintl
Posts: 25636
Joined: Wed May 24, 2000 12:12 pm

RE: New Zealand Aviation Thread 148

Tue Nov 04, 2014 12:49 am

Air NZ finally got all their ducks in a row and will be moving terminals at LAX on December 3rd.

First flight that day will be NZ6 arriving at 1030am on the 3rd.

A bit of historic ping-pong with NZ having now moved back and forth between T-2 and TBIT three times since the 1960s
 
777ER
Head Moderator
Posts: 10143
Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2003 5:04 pm

RE: New Zealand Aviation Thread 148

Tue Nov 04, 2014 5:20 am

Rumour in the Aussie Aviation Threads is that VA/NZ will be announcing a CBR-AKL and CBR-WLG E90 service shortly
 
User avatar
mercure1
Posts: 5290
Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2008 5:13 am

RE: New Zealand Aviation Thread 148

Tue Nov 04, 2014 4:00 pm

Quoting LAXintl (Reply 189):
Air NZ finally got all their ducks in a row and will be moving terminals at LAX on December 3rd.

Welcome to the big party at TBIT.

Somewhat too bad, I like using T-2 when I did. Seemed more manageable and private place than mega TBIT.
 
User avatar
sunrisevalley
Posts: 5392
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2004 3:26 am

RE: New Zealand Aviation Thread 148

Tue Nov 04, 2014 4:51 pm

Quoting 777ER (Reply 190):
Rumour in the Aussie Aviation Threads is that VA/NZ will be announcing a CBR-AKL and CBR-WLG E90 service shortly

Two of Borgetti's new international routes ?
 
PA515
Posts: 1686
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 6:17 am

RE: New Zealand Aviation Thread 148

Wed Nov 05, 2014 4:12 am

Delivery of ZK-NZG is now expected "around the last week of November". It was due in October and still hasn't flown.

http://mrcaviation.blogspot.co.nz

PA515
 
User avatar
aerorobnz
Posts: 8435
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2001 3:43 pm

RE: New Zealand Aviation Thread 148

Wed Nov 05, 2014 11:42 am

Quoting PA515 (Reply 193):
Delivery of ZK-NZG is now expected "around the last week of November". It was due in October and still hasn't flown.

I note that the 789 is doing another double round to SYD on the 25th...NZ101/102/105/108.
 
User avatar
sunrisevalley
Posts: 5392
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2004 3:26 am

RE: New Zealand Aviation Thread 148

Wed Nov 05, 2014 2:21 pm

Quoting aerorobnz (Reply 194):
I note that the 789 is doing another double round to SYD on the 25th...NZ101/102/105/108.

It seems to have done quite a number of these. Shows strong confidence in the dispatch reliability of the type.
 
User avatar
aerorobnz
Posts: 8435
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2001 3:43 pm

RE: New Zealand Aviation Thread 148

Wed Nov 05, 2014 10:23 pm

Quoting sunrisevalley (Reply 195):
It seems to have done quite a number of these. Shows strong confidence in the dispatch reliability of the type.

The standard is NZ103/104 unless they are building up crew training hours/aircraft cycles - hence usually it is NZF currently on those "double" days not NZE which is already well and truly into service. I expect there will have a few more as they build up NZG for full service longhaul as well. I don't know for sure but I think you will find NZE/NZF operating PVG and PER and NZG on 103/104 to begin with until NZ99 starts.

The entry into service for the 787 is something to be commended for NZ so far. Any further delay as a result of Boeing will be a real shame. UA has been hit with 789 delivery as well - hence their 788s currently being used for LAX-MEL.
 
User avatar
sunrisevalley
Posts: 5392
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2004 3:26 am

RE: New Zealand Aviation Thread 148

Thu Nov 06, 2014 1:22 am

Quoting aerorobnz (Reply 196):
I think you will find NZE/NZF operating PVG and PER and NZG on 103/104 to begin with until NZ99 starts.

Not going to give -NZG much shake down time , When does the 789 start on NZ99? Around Dec. 2nd?
 
User avatar
aerorobnz
Posts: 8435
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2001 3:43 pm

RE: New Zealand Aviation Thread 148

Thu Nov 06, 2014 3:06 am

Quoting sunrisevalley (Reply 197):
Not going to give -NZG much shake down time , When does the 789 start on NZ99? Around Dec. 2nd?

Sorry should reflect NZE/NZF on PER and NRT until NZG joins the fleet on full duties around the time PVG starts 14 DEC.
 
Motorhussy
Posts: 3676
Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2000 7:49 am

RE: New Zealand Aviation Thread 148

Thu Nov 06, 2014 3:55 am

Quoting sunrisevalley (Reply 192):
Two of Borgetti's new international routes ?

Good point, they probably are. Perfect planes for the routes as it's all about biz and govt pax on short term visits. Be great to see this type in WLG.

Popular Searches On Airliners.net

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos