Quoting TC957 (Reply 5): European originating pax have no need to go via LHR to China since FRA and AMS have more services there than LHR does. |
Quoting EIRules (Reply 11): Remember BA have a disadvantage compared to say LH or even KL to China in that most connections via LHR from Europe are back tracking. |
I think you are missing the point about China-UK. London (or the UK) is not the reference capital in Europe for mainland Chinese (whether it is VFR, tourism or business). That is a big difference compared to many other cities/countries in the Anglosaxon / Commonwealth world (many of those in Asia): think of anywhere from New York, Toronto, Johannesburg, Lagos, Dubai, Mumbai, Singapore, Hong Kong, Sydney... for any of those places the strongest economic and VFR in Europe is by far in London (hence all the
LHR services to those cities). That is not the case for China; for reasons A or B, Chinese need or want to travel more to Paris or Germany than to London, so that explains that
FRA or
CDG have far more services; it is not only about geography. London is not the center of the world for anyone out there.
You can look at trade numbers (Germany is 5 times as high as the UK), VFR (France has the largest Chinese community in Europe) or tourism (France receives about 6 times more Chinese tourists than the UK; even Austria or Switzerland have more Chinese tourists than the UK) to see that the local market is smaller than in other European capitals.