Quoting Rhody (Reply 48): |
In that case then it sounds like they just get to keep the reserve fuel from the last test flight the plane took. Less effort than defueling
Moderators: jsumali2, richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
Quoting Rhody (Reply 48): |
Quoting peterinlisbon (Reply 4): *Offer does not apply to the KC-767 tankers. |
Quoting SYDSpotter (Reply 5): This is probably standard business practice, when I go to pick up my new car it is fuelled up (although I can't remember if it was filled to the brim or just enough to make it to the nearest petrol station |
Quoting mmo (Reply 9): There is no such thing as a free lunch!!!!! |
Quoting Luftfahrer (Reply 18): They may actually have to dump fuel on the delivery flight. |
Quoting Rhody (Reply 48): Tour guide said Boeing throws in ~1/3 tank of fuel for each delivered plane. Topping off was on the airline's dime. |
Quoting airportugal310 (Reply 47): Doubtful. That can easily be checked during a taxi test or a flight test... |
Quoting ORDJOE (Reply 39): Another perspective, the buyer can ask for what ever they want when negotiating purchase price. I am not sure how much it is to fill a 77W to the top, but I somehow think it is not all that much to do that in the grand scheme of things, afterall a 77W is 200million. They can do it for goodwill, or a way to get a better offer from the client. |
Quoting SEPilot (Reply 52): Has anyone considered that perhaps Boeing wants to fill the tanks to the brim at least once to make sure there is no leak? This would not be done at any time during the manufacturing process, AFAIK. |
Quoting Max Q (Reply 53): You hit the nail on the head there ! |
Quoting Vanguard737 (Reply 45): How exactly is he missing the point? |
Quoting Unflug (Reply 29): What's your point then, if I may ask? |
Quoting mmo (Reply 21): Then perhaps you could enlighten all of us then!!!! |
Quoting ChicagoFlyer (Reply 44): On a 737, the customer confidence is obviously high, and I have been part of transactions where 737 was delivered with sufficient fuel for the flyaway flight (not full tanks), paid for Boeing, in return for customer waiving the flight test. |
Quoting ltbewr (Reply 46): Perhaps the tanks are filled to capacity to do a final check of the tanks, fuel measuring and related system. |
Quoting ltbewr (Reply 46): Doubtful. That can easily be checked during a taxi test or a flight test... |
Quoting SEPilot (Reply 52): Has anyone considered that perhaps Boeing wants to fill the tanks to the brim at least once to make sure there is no leak? This would not be done at any time during the manufacturing process, AFAIK. |
Quoting yeelep (Reply 55): AS took delivery of a 737 yesterday, 8,000 lbs of fuel onboard on arrival in SEA. |
Quoting DocLightning (Reply 1): Don't know if it's true, but there is no such thing as a free lunch. If Boeing is fueling the aircraft for "free," then the cost of that fuel will be somehow recouped in the price of the aircraft. Just because it's not listed as a line item doesn't mean that the customer isn't ultimately paying for it. |
Quoting SEPilot (Reply 3): I am sure that there are many airlines that buy Boeing for the free tank of fuel. After all, $50,000 or so makes a tremendous difference on a $100,000,000 purchase. |
Quoting migair54 (Reply 62): If you keep addingbwe go to many millions . |
Quoting migair54 (Reply 62): It's not possible. How many planes Boeing deliver a month?? In 2013 Boeing delivered: -B737......440 units -B767.....21 units -B747.....24 units -B777.....98 units -B787....65 units Now multiply that for the capacity and for the price per tonne and you'll see how millions of $ we are talking about. For one B77W is: 47,890 U.S. gal (181,280 L)x (maybe around 6 usd per gallon)= 287.340Usd in fuel only 1 B77W. If you keep addingbwe go to many millions . |
Quoting SAAFNAV (Reply 37): Quoting peterinlisbon (Reply 4): *Offer does not apply to the KC-767 tankers. With all the hair splitting, this comment was seriously overlooked.... |