Moderators: jsumali2, richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
Quoting MaverickM11 (Reply 3): I'm not sure it has much to do with UA's changes so much as CM just wanting to gain control of its frequent flyers. The airline generally scorches the rest of the industry in terms of profitability, so why should it hand its frequent flyers to someone else's program? Bring it in house and monetize it.... |
Quoting FriscoHeavy (Reply 1): Copa probably is tired of UA devaluing their program so much. I'm a big UA flyer, but I'm happy for Copa. I hope they come out with a robust and rewarding program. |
Quoting LAXintl (Reply 2): Clearly the restructuring of MP to a revenue based model was not something Copa wanted to go along with. While the model I think is the right one long term, its not something Copa's regional competitors have adopted yet unlike in the U.S. |
Quoting LOWS (Reply 7): The reveue requirement only applies to MP accounts with US addresses. |
![]() |
Quoting LAXintl (Reply 8): Quoting LOWS (Reply 7): The reveue requirement only applies to MP accounts with US addresses. It applies to everyone. Earning is based on spend. Entire program changes from distance to revenue based one. Copa was stuck accepting this, or luckily had the freedom starting in 2015 to do its own thing. |