Someone83
Topic Author
Posts: 4382
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 5:47 pm

SAS Starting ARN-HKG Sep 15

Thu Dec 18, 2014 7:14 am

During their 2014 financial presentation today, SAS announced a new route. Stockholm - Hong Kong will be operated 5x wekkly from September 2015
 
B747forever
Posts: 13787
Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 9:50 pm

RE: SAS Starting ARN-HKG Sep 15

Thu Dec 18, 2014 8:26 am

Wow, some fantastic news! Wasnt really expecting this.

Now I am sure there are many that will be shocked down at CPH today  


Has the schedule been released yet?
Work Hard, Fly Right
 
Cipango
Posts: 1498
Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2009 3:55 pm

RE: SAS Starting ARN-HKG Sep 15

Thu Dec 18, 2014 10:06 am

This will fit into their Asia network nicely I think. It was a gap in the market especially as they serve most other large Asian cities.

5x weekly is nice too. Would have thought they would start with 3x but 5 is great!
Let's fly! Unless it's on a CRJ 200, then I'll stay down here.
 
skane340
Posts: 66
Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 7:32 am

RE: SAS Starting ARN-HKG Sep 15

Thu Dec 18, 2014 10:14 am

What AC will they use?
 
User avatar
Thunderboltdrgn
Posts: 1962
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2012 5:39 pm

RE: SAS Starting ARN-HKG Sep 15

Thu Dec 18, 2014 10:52 am

Quoting skane340 (Reply 3):
What AC will they use?

I don't know, but I assume that it will be an A330?

[Edited 2014-12-18 03:41:52]
Like a thunderbolt of lightning the Dragon roars across the sky. Il Drago Ruggente
 
Kiwirob
Posts: 12237
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 2:16 pm

RE: SAS Starting ARN-HKG Sep 15

Thu Dec 18, 2014 11:01 am

Another great option to get back to NZ from Norway.
 
777way
Posts: 6470
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 1:38 am

RE: SAS Starting ARN-HKG Sep 15

Thu Dec 18, 2014 11:12 am

isnt it a fomer destination of theirs?
 
Someone83
Topic Author
Posts: 4382
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 5:47 pm

RE: SAS Starting ARN-HKG Sep 15

Thu Dec 18, 2014 11:17 am

Quoting 777way (Reply 6):
isnt it a fomer destination of theirs?

They did operate CPH-HKG earlier, but that was closed around 1998. Don't think it ever operated from Chep Lak Kok, and was closed about the same time as Kai Tak
 
B777LRF
Posts: 2485
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 4:23 am

RE: SAS Starting ARN-HKG Sep 15

Thu Dec 18, 2014 3:12 pm

Quoting cipango (Reply 2):
especially as they serve most other large Asian cities.

You mean, apart from Bangkok, KL, Manila, Seoul (Inchon), Nagoya, Osaka, Shandong, Shenyang, Nanjing and Taipei?

SAS has a rather poor presence in Asia these days. SIN, NRT, PVG and PEK is all it amounts to. And, in a bit less than a year, they'll be back in Honkers after an 18 year absence. Not out of their main hub though, but from one of their two secondaries. Woopty-fracking-doo.
Signature. You just read one.
 
jetblue1965
Posts: 5050
Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2014 1:28 pm

RE: SAS Starting ARN-HKG Sep 15

Thu Dec 18, 2014 3:18 pm

Quoting someone83 (Reply 7):

Minor correction : it's Chek Lap Kok
 
User avatar
HELyes
Posts: 1637
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2010 4:26 am

RE: SAS Starting ARN-HKG Sep 15

Thu Dec 18, 2014 3:28 pm

Quoting B777LRF (Reply 8):
SIN, NRT, PVG and PEK is all it amounts to.

NRT, PVG, PEK and BKK but not SIN.

Interesting to see how HKG works for SK, anyway always good to see new LH routes up here.
 
SKAirbus
Posts: 1533
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 9:18 pm

RE: SAS Starting ARN-HKG Sep 15

Thu Dec 18, 2014 5:02 pm

I think ARN is best placed for HKG (and should be for other Asian routes too) as it avoids backtracking for all Scandinavian passengers.
Base: BRU
 
User avatar
Navigator
Posts: 869
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2001 2:31 am

RE: SAS Starting ARN-HKG Sep 15

Thu Dec 18, 2014 7:35 pm

Quoting B777LRF (Reply 8):
Not out of their main hub though

SAS has three main hubs: ARN, CPH and OSL.
747-400/747-200/L1011/DC-10/DC-9/DC-8/MD-80/MD90/A340/A330/A300/A310/A321/A320/A319/767/757/737/727/HS-121/CV990/CV440/S
 
SASDC8
Posts: 530
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 10:01 pm

RE: SAS Starting ARN-HKG Sep 15

Thu Dec 18, 2014 8:03 pm

Great news indeed  
Quoting SKAirbus (Reply 11):

And out of ARN there should be no problem with space at their long haul pier, as it is pretty much deserted all day long  
2-3-2 is NOT a premium configuration
 
Tristarsteve
Posts: 3595
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 11:04 pm

RE: SAS Starting ARN-HKG Sep 15

Thu Dec 18, 2014 8:08 pm

Quoting SASDC8 (Reply 13):
And out of ARN there should be no problem with space at their long haul pier, as it is pretty much deserted all day long

Yes, thats why they are going to build a new one? Pier G is in planning.
 
Luftymatt
Posts: 495
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 7:27 pm

RE: SAS Starting ARN-HKG Sep 15

Thu Dec 18, 2014 8:16 pm

Quoting thunderboltdrgn (Reply 4):
I assume that it will be an A330?

I would have thought it would be an A340. I'm not sure an A330-300 could make it non-stop, not without being heavily payload restricted anyway.

Great news for SAS and ARN  Smile

[Edited 2014-12-18 12:17:31]
chase the sun
 
User avatar
hilram
Posts: 734
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2014 11:12 am

RE: SAS Starting ARN-HKG Sep 15

Thu Dec 18, 2014 8:33 pm

Quoting LuftyMatt (Reply 15):
I would have thought it would be an A340. I'm not sure an A330-300 could make it non-stop, not without being heavily payload restricted anyway.

The two new A330-300 HGW they are receiving in 2015 might do it. They have the center tank activated, that used to be for A340 only.
Flown on: A319, 320, 321, 332, 333, 343 | B732, 734, 735, 736, 73G, 738, 743, 744, 772, 77W | BAe-146 | DHC-6, 7, 8 | F50 | E195 | MD DC-9 41, MD-82, MD-87
 
LN-KGL
Posts: 821
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 1999 6:40 am

RE: SAS Starting ARN-HKG Sep 15

Thu Dec 18, 2014 10:16 pm

Finally is SAS moving in the right direction. Six years and nine months ago we had a dicussion around a similar theme (see link below). The real fun starts with reply 27. Clearly a lot of water has flowed under the bridge between then and now, but it also shows the trench lines then.

https://www.airliners.net/aviation-fo...eneral_aviation/read.main/3859509/
 
Cipango
Posts: 1498
Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2009 3:55 pm

RE: SAS Starting ARN-HKG Sep 15

Thu Dec 18, 2014 10:35 pm

Quoting B777LRF (Reply 8):
You mean, apart from Bangkok, KL, Manila, Seoul (Inchon), Nagoya, Osaka, Shandong, Shenyang, Nanjing and Taipei?

I wouldn't quite put them up in the same list as Beijing, Shanghai and Tokyo.
Let's fly! Unless it's on a CRJ 200, then I'll stay down here.
 
KaiTak747
Posts: 346
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2012 11:08 pm

RE: SAS Starting ARN-HKG Sep 15

Thu Dec 18, 2014 10:49 pm

Does anyone know where the aircraft are coming from? Deliveries or route cuts?
 
Someone83
Topic Author
Posts: 4382
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 5:47 pm

RE: SAS Starting ARN-HKG Sep 15

Thu Dec 18, 2014 10:58 pm

Quoting KaiTak747 (Reply 19):

Does anyone know where the aircraft are coming from?

SAS is getting two new A330-300 deliveries in 2015
 
DeltaB717
Posts: 1682
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2012 3:49 am

RE: SAS Starting ARN-HKG Sep 15

Thu Dec 18, 2014 11:30 pm

Quoting hilram (Reply 16):

  
 
User avatar
lesfalls
Posts: 3267
Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2013 11:58 pm

RE: SAS Starting ARN-HKG Sep 15

Fri Dec 19, 2014 12:51 am

Congrats to SK. Finnaly they are stopping their addiction with CPH  .
Lufthansa: Einfach ein bisschen mehr.
 
SLCLAXKIXKHH
Posts: 70
Joined: Tue Dec 05, 2006 12:10 am

RE: SAS Starting ARN-HKG Sep 15

Fri Dec 19, 2014 1:46 am

WIll HKG be their only long-haul destination served from ARN, but not from CPH?
I'm not anti-social. I'm just not user friendly.
 
User avatar
HELyes
Posts: 1637
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2010 4:26 am

RE: SAS Starting ARN-HKG Sep 15

Fri Dec 19, 2014 3:40 am

Quoting slclaxkixkhh (Reply 23):

WIll HKG be their only long-haul destination served from ARN, but not from CPH?

At the moment there are ORD and EWR served from ARN.
 
Viscount724
Posts: 19316
Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 7:32 pm

RE: SAS Starting ARN-HKG Sep 15

Fri Dec 19, 2014 4:14 am

Quoting someone83 (Reply 7):
Quoting 777way (Reply 6):
isnt it a fomer destination of theirs?

They did operate CPH-HKG earlier, but that was closed around 1998.

SAS was unable to obtain traffic rights to HKG for many years. They only started service in June 1992
 
User avatar
thekorean
Posts: 1767
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2011 9:05 pm

RE: SAS Starting ARN-HKG Sep 15

Fri Dec 19, 2014 4:22 am

Quoting cipango (Reply 18):

Seoul and Taipei? Why not? Rest yea.
 
B-HOP
Posts: 781
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 8:09 pm

RE: SAS Starting ARN-HKG Sep 15

Fri Dec 19, 2014 5:47 am

Both ICN and TPE are Star hub but BJS have the same roll in penetrating greater China whilst TPE are the end of the road, so both relies on O&D demand which doesn't exist. For SAS, welcome to HKG! Just wonder what are the departure times?
Live life to max!!!
 
User avatar
thekorean
Posts: 1767
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2011 9:05 pm

RE: SAS Starting ARN-HKG Sep 15

Fri Dec 19, 2014 6:03 am

Quoting b-hop (Reply 27):

Plenty of cargo demands out of ICN though. But yea SAS dont do cargo only.
 
continental004
Posts: 381
Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2014 11:53 pm

RE: SAS Starting ARN-HKG Sep 15

Fri Dec 19, 2014 6:22 am

Quoting HELyes (Reply 24):

Both ORD and EWR are also served from CPH.
 
User avatar
HELyes
Posts: 1637
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2010 4:26 am

RE: SAS Starting ARN-HKG Sep 15

Fri Dec 19, 2014 7:18 am

Quoting continental004 (Reply 29):
Both ORD and EWR are also served from CPH.

Yes you're right, was thinking LH routes from ARN generally.

Hopefully this means new choices further from HKG, like to BKK on TG? The AY+CX combo works smoothly, not sure how it is with Star.
 
Asiaflyer
Posts: 861
Joined: Fri May 11, 2007 11:50 am

RE: SAS Starting ARN-HKG Sep 15

Fri Dec 19, 2014 8:11 am

Quoting lesfalls (Reply 22):
Congrats to SK. Finnaly they are stopping their addiction with CPH

Agree!! Good decision by SAS!!!
SK has lost a way too big marketshare out of Stockholm area, which is by far the powerhouse of Scandinavia.
SQ,MI,MH,CX,KA,CA,CZ,MU,KE,OZ,QF,NZ,FD,JQ,3K,5J,IT,AI,IC,QR,SK,LF,KL,AF,LH,LX,OS,SR,BA,SN,FR,WF,1I,5T,VZ,VX,AC,NW,UA,US,
 
LN-KGL
Posts: 821
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 1999 6:40 am

RE: SAS Starting ARN-HKG Sep 15

Fri Dec 19, 2014 8:16 am

SAS is today flying to 8 intercontinental destinations from 4 Scandinavian airports:
- CPH 7 EWR, IAD, NRT, ORD, PEK, PVG, SFO
- ARN 2 EWR, ORD
- OSL 1 EWR
- SVG 1 IAH

The three first are flown with a combination of A333 and A343, while SVG-IAH is flown with a 44 seat all Business Class B73G.
 
Kevin777
Posts: 951
Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2006 5:36 pm

RE: SAS Starting ARN-HKG Sep 15

Fri Dec 19, 2014 9:11 am

Always happy to see my national carrier adding new routes, and congrats to Stockholm and ARN (and HKG) for this one!

Am I a bit surprised? Yes, have to admit that. Was hoping/expecting something like CPH-ICN or OSL-ORD. But I think there can be several good reasons for an ARN-HKG route.
First and foremost, I think this is a punch in the face to AY, who have had a stronghold in this market, because competition from other EU hubs on ARN-HKG just isn't as fierce when alternatives via LHR, FRA or whatever gives you severe backtracking and several hours extra flying time versus going via HEL.
Secondly, as for starting out of ARN instead of CPH, this does give around half an hour shorter flying time according to GCM - may not sound like lot, but this might just be the difference between being able to fly roundtrip and be ready again for the next one within 24 hours or not - in the latter case, it becomes very messy operationally if you want to have a consistent schedule across the week, especially for an Airline like SK with a relatively small long-haul fleet.

All that being said, not going out of CPH means losing out on a lot of transfer traffic from smaller destinations in Northwestern Europe, Poland and the Baltics not served from ARN. Also, they lose a lot of operational and revenue benefits from not having their Asian network consolidated at CPH. IIRC, SK has tried both BJS and BKK from ARN earlier with no success.

Quoting HELyes (Reply 10):
NRT, PVG, PEK and BKK but not SIN

Not BKK anymore. They don't do SIN, but have an extensive collaboration with SQ on CPH-SIN (not sure of the details, but it's a lot more than just a usual codeshare)

Quoting hilram (Reply 16):
The two new A330-300 HGW they are receiving in 2015 might do it. They have the center tank activated, that used to be for A340 only.

I think that's a good guess. Currently, the 333s and 343s are used on ORD, EWR and IAD interchangeably (mostly 333 though), but I have never seen a 333 on the Asian routes (or SFO for that matter). I think ARN-HKG would require a 343 if using their current fleet.

Quoting LN-KGL (Reply 32):
SAS is today flying to 8 intercontinental destinations from 4 Scandinavian airports:
- CPH 7 EWR, IAD, NRT, ORD, PEK, PVG, SFO
- ARN 2 EWR, ORD
- OSL 1 EWR
- SVG 1 IAH

The three first are flown with a combination of A333 and A343, while SVG-IAH is flown with a 44 seat all Business Class B73G.

Could ARN-HKG-ARN be done within a 24-hour window? Then it would operationally fit quite nicely to continue to have only 330s (including one of the HGW's) flying out of ARN; one to do the daily EWR roundtrip, one for ORD and one for HKG. The latter two not being flown daily (at least not yearround) would give a "day off" here and there for maintenance, cushion for major delays etc.

Kevin777  
"I was waiting for you at DFW, but you must have been in LUV" CPH-HAM-CPH CR9
 
planewasted
Posts: 527
Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 11:47 pm

RE: SAS Starting ARN-HKG Sep 15

Fri Dec 19, 2014 10:26 am

Hmm... I used to fly a lot to Hong Kong from Stockholm a few years ago. I remember the prices for ARN-HKG was always quite low. Is this still the case? Might be hard earning money on the route then. But SK can of course charge a bit extra because the flight is non stop.
 
SKAirbus
Posts: 1533
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 9:18 pm

RE: SAS Starting ARN-HKG Sep 15

Fri Dec 19, 2014 11:19 am

Quoting SASDC8 (Reply 13):
And out of ARN there should be no problem with space at their long haul pier, as it is pretty much deserted all day long  

It's true, Pier F is very empty most of the time apart from being used as an overflow for the other piers during busy times and for long haul flights.
Base: BRU
 
B-HOP
Posts: 781
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 8:09 pm

RE: SAS Starting ARN-HKG Sep 15

Fri Dec 19, 2014 2:47 pm

Yes, it should just fit into 24 hours window, Finnair had used the same aircraft two days in a row for the morning departure in summer and yes, they used 333 too, so SK should make it with a 333. A restructure in ORD/EWR departure means only one aircraft is needed for this route, unless they pick evening departures from ARN and overnight departre from HKG then this is a different case.

Kev

[Edited 2014-12-19 07:46:28]
Live life to max!!!
 
lucce
Posts: 169
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2011 3:12 pm

RE: SAS Starting ARN-HKG Sep 15

Fri Dec 19, 2014 3:18 pm

Quoting Kevin777 (Reply 33):
Could ARN-HKG-ARN be done within a 24-hour window?
Quoting Kevin777 (Reply 33):
Secondly, as for starting out of ARN instead of CPH, this does give around half an hour shorter flying time according to GCM - may not sound like lot, but this might just be the difference between being able to fly roundtrip and be ready again for the next one within 24 hours or not - in the latter case

HEL is another half an hour closer and they can't accomplish 24h turns on HKG route. The HEL-HKG-HEL legs are 9h50min and 11h respectively. That would leave too little turnaround time/wiggle room.
 
lucce
Posts: 169
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2011 3:12 pm

RE: SAS Starting ARN-HKG Sep 15

Fri Dec 19, 2014 3:27 pm

Quoting lucce (Reply 37):
HEL is another half an hour closer and they can't accomplish 24h turns on HKG route.
Quoting b-hop (Reply 36):
Finnair had used the same aircraft two days in a row for the morning departure in summer and yes, they used 333 took, so SK should make it with a 333.

I stand corrected. But it would be tight and since ARN is further away from HKG than HEL is might be too little.

Anyways this will put some pressure on AY. Currently they are using their HKG route as the designated delayed flight: if any other Asian destination has a aircraft going technical, the HKG plane is used for that route and they try to fix the aircraft on time for HKG. Sometimes they can, sometimes not. The layover in HKG is long enough that the return wont be delayed and they only offer few connections from HKG. Maybe this will force them to up their game.
 
B-HOP
Posts: 781
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 8:09 pm

RE: SAS Starting ARN-HKG Sep 15

Fri Dec 19, 2014 4:10 pm

What I say is re-time one of the US flights to create e.g EWR-ARN-HKG-ARN-HKG within 48 hours
Live life to max!!!
 
RedChili
Posts: 1440
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 9:23 am

RE: SAS Starting ARN-HKG Sep 15

Sat Dec 20, 2014 12:25 am

Really exiting news!

If they want premium customers, they may have to use double overnight flights. The timing of such flights would be something like:

ARN-HKG 23:30-15:50
HKG-ARN 23:55-05:15

The problem would obviously be that they would need two planes, and what to do with them between 05:15-23:20 in ARN.


I have a feeling that we may rather see something like this:

ARN-HKG 18:00-10:20
HKG-ARN 12:30-17:50

The problem with this schedule is that you can't get the whole schedule within 24 hours.
Top 10 airplanes: B737, T154, B747, IL96, T134, IL62, A320, MD80, B757, DC10
 
Viscount724
Posts: 19316
Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 7:32 pm

RE: SAS Starting ARN-HKG Sep 15

Sat Dec 20, 2014 4:03 am

Quoting RedChili (Reply 40):
I have a feeling that we may rather see something like this:

ARN-HKG 18:00-10:20
HKG-ARN 12:30-17:50

The problem with this schedule is that you can't get the whole schedule within 24 hours.

Business travellers paying the premium fares prefer overnight flights. The daytime flights seldom generate the highest yields.

HKG currently has about 21 daily (a few not quite daily) nonstops to 11 cities in Europe on 9 airlines. Only 4 of those 21 flights are daytime. All the others leave within an hour or two of midnight. The redeye flights also maximize connectivity at both ends of the route.
 
Someone83
Topic Author
Posts: 4382
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 5:47 pm

RE: SAS Starting ARN-HKG Sep 15

Sat Dec 20, 2014 3:03 pm

All SAS current Asia flights are daytime going back to Europe (PEK/PVG/NRT-CPH)
 
Kevin777
Posts: 951
Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2006 5:36 pm

RE: SAS Starting ARN-HKG Sep 15

Tue Dec 23, 2014 8:39 am

Flemming Jensen (COO SAS) has disclosed a bit more about why ARN was chosen ahead of CPH (Danish only):

http://www.check-in.dk/doedt-loeb-om-hong-kong-potentiale#.VJkln2ceA

Basically, he says that the market between CPH and HKG is no doubt bigger than the market between ARN and HKG; however, because Finnair is so strong on Asia for the Swedes, and CPH originating pax could better be pursuaded to go via ARN than the other way around, they decided to go with ARN. But it was a very close race.

Let's see. If it proves succesful, then it sure could mean something for the future of SK's other Asian routes - should they then move to ARN? I guess it could be a viable option. However, if ARN-HKG is no success, then I think it's a bit of a nail in the coffin for more SK long-haul from ARN, especially since SK has tried it before (BJS and BKK) and discontinued.

Quoting RedChili (Reply 40):
ARN-HKG 23:30-15:50
HKG-ARN 23:55-05:15

The problem would obviously be that they would need two planes, and what to do with them between 05:15-23:20 in ARN.

..and what to do with the planes for 8 hours in HKG. SK's old CPH-BKK flights were night flights both ways, schedule similar to above. But this meant a long unproductive layover in BKK, which used to be used for a short hop to SIN, but that ended some years ago. 8 hours layover is not unheard of for long-haul; for instance European carriers in South America or South Africa, but still, of course best avoided.

Quoting RedChili (Reply 40):
I have a feeling that we may rather see something like this:

ARN-HKG 18:00-10:20
HKG-ARN 12:30-17:50

The problem with this schedule is that you can't get the whole schedule within 24 hours.

I think a schedule like that you mention here would be likely. It's similar to the current SK CPH-Asia Schedules, so makes good commercial sense.

As for the 24-hour problem, as mentioned earlier in this thread, it could be solved by combining it with the EWR flight. However, I think the HKG flight would then have to be a bit earlier, e.g.:

ARN-HKG 15:30-07:50
HKG-ARN 10:00-15:20
ARN-EWR 18:05-21.00
EWR-ARN 23:20-13.05

SK's ARN-EWR would then be an evening flight instead of the current morning flight.

It would be pushing it just a bit with above schedule; however, if HKG is only 5 x weekly, then there are two days a week where even long delays that have built up can be dealt with.

Kevin777
"I was waiting for you at DFW, but you must have been in LUV" CPH-HAM-CPH CR9
 
sailas
Posts: 187
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 8:58 am

RE: SAS Starting ARN-HKG Sep 15

Tue Dec 23, 2014 10:10 am

Quoting Kevin777 (Reply 33):
Quoting b-hop (Reply 36):

With the a330 HGW do they have to still limit passenger/cargo capacity, i Know AY has the E version and has to do this but do not know about the HGW.

Wasn't one of AY's first A350 routes HK? If so a33a vs. A359 for some people will decide the flight. Also even though HEL airport is far from being perfect ARN is worse in my point of view. I know many business travelers who avoid ARN at all costs and fly through HEL because it's simply easier.
Airlines been on: AY, LX, SR, OS, SK, KF, EZY, FR, BA, LH, AF, TG, DC, FC, TK, KL, BT, CX, QR
 
Asiaflyer
Posts: 861
Joined: Fri May 11, 2007 11:50 am

RE: SAS Starting ARN-HKG Sep 15

Tue Dec 23, 2014 10:19 am

Quoting Kevin777 (Reply 43):
Basically, he says that the market between CPH and HKG is no doubt bigger than the market between ARN and HKG; however, because Finnair is so strong on Asia for the Swedes, and CPH originating pax could better be pursuaded to go via ARN than the other way around, they decided to go with ARN. But it was a very close race.

Would be very interesting to see what his actual data comes from. He says the market between CPH and HKG is bigger than between ARN and CPH. Either he compares todays funneled traffic via CPH with only O/D traffic from ARN, or Danish people goes to HKG as tourists like never before.  

Stockholm and Sweden is by far the economic power house of the Nordic countries. Have a look at Wiki about where the largest Nordic companies are located. It speaks by itself.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Largest_Nordic_Companies

Sounds like the danish SAS maffias still claims that CPH is bigger, but now at least they start to make senseful decisions. Many lost years of poor danish management has to be take back.
SQ,MI,MH,CX,KA,CA,CZ,MU,KE,OZ,QF,NZ,FD,JQ,3K,5J,IT,AI,IC,QR,SK,LF,KL,AF,LH,LX,OS,SR,BA,SN,FR,WF,1I,5T,VZ,VX,AC,NW,UA,US,
 
Kevin777
Posts: 951
Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2006 5:36 pm

RE: SAS Starting ARN-HKG Sep 15

Tue Dec 23, 2014 10:32 am

Quoting sailas (Reply 44):
If so a33a vs. A359 for some people will decide the flight.

For a.netters perhaps... for many others it doesn't matter, and certainly not if one is nonstop and the other is not. And a brand-new 330 versus a brand-new 350? Doubt if the customer experience is that different in practice, at least for most people by far.

Quoting sailas (Reply 44):
Also even though HEL airport is far from being perfect ARN is worse in my point of view. I know many business travelers who avoid ARN at all costs and fly through HEL because it's simply easier.

I have never been to HEL, but in AY's marketing they do focus a lot on the easy connectivity in a (relatively) smaller airport versus connecting at FRA, LHR or similar.

But compared to CPH and OSL, ARN is definitely far away I totally agree. Old buldings, many of them in need for heavy maintenance or replacement; old hardware (e.g. baggage belts etc.), and then the whole mess of what, 5-7 terminals or so, with many - to the customer at least - oddities as to which Airline flies from which terminal to which destinations (I don't want to start up yet another SE/NO/DK forum-war here at all, but I think even most supporters of Stockholm as the "right" centre of Scandinavia would agree, that as an airport, ARN is inferior to OSL and CPH)

Kevin777  
"I was waiting for you at DFW, but you must have been in LUV" CPH-HAM-CPH CR9
 
sailas
Posts: 187
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 8:58 am

RE: SAS Starting ARN-HKG Sep 15

Tue Dec 23, 2014 10:48 am

Quoting Asiaflyer (Reply 45):

Sure, but you're missing the point, FInland is no.1 in technology companies in the north, and where do we make our business?
I'm sure it will be tough for both SK and AY but my bets on the blue and white.

Quoting Kevin777 (Reply 46):

Last time i flew via ARN i hated changing to the domestic terminal .
Airlines been on: AY, LX, SR, OS, SK, KF, EZY, FR, BA, LH, AF, TG, DC, FC, TK, KL, BT, CX, QR
 
ThReaTeN
Posts: 219
Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2014 10:52 pm

RE: SAS Starting ARN-HKG Sep 15

Tue Dec 23, 2014 11:46 am

Quoting Asiaflyer (Reply 45):
Would be very interesting to see what his actual data comes from. He says the market between CPH and HKG is bigger than between ARN and CPH. Either he compares todays funneled traffic via CPH with only O/D traffic from ARN, or Danish people goes to HKG as tourists like never before.

Stockholm and Sweden is by far the economic power house of the Nordic countries. Have a look at Wiki about where the largest Nordic companies are located. It speaks by itself.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Largest_Nordic_Companies

Sounds like the danish SAS maffias still claims that CPH is bigger, but now at least they start to make senseful decisions. Many lost years of poor danish management has to be take back.

Just looking at a list on Wikipedia of the largest companies obviously won't tell the whole story. It's true that Sweden has the largest economy (and population) in Scandinavia with many prominent industrial companies but Denmark has traditionally been far more successful in the areas of shipping and commerce, something that probably still to a great extent fuels international air travel between Copenhagen and other commercial/shipping centers such as Hong Kong. Many Swedish companies such as Volvo and SKF are barely at all even present in the Stockholm area but have their base in Gothenburg, and employees and executives travelling in business for those companies can just as well connect through CPH as through ARN (in fact, though I haven't checked, I think Copenhagen is actually closer to Gothenburg than Stockholm). There are also certain sectors where the Danes have a dominant position among Scandinavians, for example in pharmaceuticals (Novo Nordisk comes to mind). Yes, Sweden has Astra(Zeneca) but they are a shadow of what they once were.

On the question of whether Finnair A350s will outshine SAS A330s - I wonder if ARN-HKG might become one of the routes where SAS puts the A350 into service first once they start taking deliveries in 2018 (IIRC)? While a brand new A330-300HGW (hey! it's got a center-line tank... and it's actually activated!!) is exciting and all (*cough*) it's hard to compete with the A350 on sex appeal. 
 
Kevin777
Posts: 951
Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2006 5:36 pm

RE: SAS Starting ARN-HKG Sep 15

Tue Dec 23, 2014 11:54 am

Quoting Asiaflyer (Reply 45):
Would be very interesting to see what his actual data comes from. He says the market between CPH and HKG is bigger than between ARN and CPH. Either he compares todays funneled traffic via CPH with only O/D traffic from ARN, or Danish people goes to HKG as tourists like never before.

The data comes from GDS bookings ARN-HKG versus CPH-HKG. 20 % more of the latter. Granted, it may not account for everything, but would still give a good indication. As for Danes going a lot to Hong Kong, perhaps they do, but also be reminded that 1/5 or so of the Swedish population has CPH as their (major) home airport.

Quoting sailas (Reply 47):
Last time i flew via ARN i hated changing to the domestic terminal

I have never tried to connect at ARN, but I can imagine it can be a hassle. I was in ARN in November, and I looked at a map of the airport with listings of which airline flies from which terminals - not too bad with four or five terminals (but a bit much for an airport the size of ARN IMO), but then came several exceptions, e.g. "Airline XX flies from T2 except for destination ZZZ which is operated from T4". But compared to several US airports, with 6-8-10 terminals, ARN is not so bad I guess.

Kevin777
"I was waiting for you at DFW, but you must have been in LUV" CPH-HAM-CPH CR9

Popular Searches On Airliners.net

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos