Moderators: jsumali2, richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
Quoting RJ321 (Thread starter): Search has been suspended |
Quoting KarelXWB (Reply 1): That information is incorrect, search is still ongoing. |
Quoting enilria (Reply 4): |
Quoting rj777 (Reply 5): |
Quoting MEA-707 (Reply 10): Isn't there any juridical , insurance or economical implication that they call it an 'accident' instead of (likely/possible) 'foul play' or 'sabotage'? |
Quoting MEA-707 (Reply 8): Isn't there any juridical , insurance or economical implication that they call it an 'accident' instead of (likely/possible) 'foul play' or 'sabotage'? |
Quoting MEA-707 (Reply 8): |
Quoting thunderboltdrgn (Reply 9): |
Quoting rj777 (Reply 4): I believe the word "incident" would be a better choice. |
Quoting ltbewr (Reply 3): This is critical to many as can now file claims with life insurance companies for payments and for certain widow/children benefits from governments to victim families. |
Quoting a380787 (Reply 7): I'm surprised it took so long. We're nearly at the 1-year mark of the "accident". |
Quoting AIRWALK (Reply 12): |
Quoting Flightglobal: Australian officials are seeking to change the formal definition of an aircraft accident to clarify uncertainties thrown up by the case of Malaysia Airlines flight MH370. In a paper to this week’s ICAO high-level safety conference in Montreal, representatives want clearer guidance over the status of a missing aircraft as well as the transition between search operations for survivors and those for crash investigation purposes. It points out that, during the hunt for MH370, the Australian operation transitioned from search-and-rescue to search-and-recovery, around the end of April 2014. But the paper says there was “no clear guidance” as to whether the continuing effort was the responsibility of the Australian rescue co-ordination centre or the Malaysian accident investigation authority. |
Quoting thunderboltdrgn (Reply 15): It points out that, during the hunt for MH370, the Australian operation transitioned from search-and-rescue to search-and-recovery, around the end of April 2014. |
Quoting thunderboltdrgn (Reply 15): But the paper says there was “no clear guidance” as to whether the continuing effort was the responsibility of the Australian rescue co-ordination centre or the Malaysian accident investigation authority. |
Quoting 777Jet (Reply 16): Malaysia should be funding the entire recovery effort for their lost item. |
Quoting tailskid (Reply 17): Quoting 777Jet (Reply 16): Malaysia should be funding the entire recovery effort for their lost item. I think Malaysia would be happy with a ruling like that. Then they would end funding for the search immediately and that would be that. I don't believe that Malaysia wants that plane to be found. |