Moderators: jsumali2, richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
Quoting 9MMPD (Reply 5): 9M-MTL which operated the MH125/124 arrived 4 hours late into Perth tonight could MH52 be a knock on for the late inbound MH124? |
Quoting EGPH (Reply 3): Well taking a quick look on Flightradar24's data service it shows that for both the 13th and 14th February MH52 was operated by planes inbound from Australia which landed on time but many hours after MH52's scheduled departure. FR24 is giving me what I think are Zulu times and it's too early in the morning here for me to convert them: 14 Feb - operated by 9M-MTK MH52s scheduled departure time in Zulu time is 15:50. 9M-MTK arrived into KUL from BNE at 21:05 Zulu which was 15 mins ahead of schedule. 9M-MTK lifted off as MH52 at 22:50 Zulu (7 hours behind) 13 Feb - operated by 9M-MTI 9M-MTK was inbound from SYD and landed on time at 09:15 Zulu and departed as MH52 at 11:35 Zulu, only 45 mins late. Certainly an aircraft issue here is it's used twice in a row by aircraft that were not due in until after the scheduled take-off. |
Quoting IndianicWorld (Reply 6): Sounds like some significant scheduling issues being encountered . Not good for customer perception really. Let's hope they can sort it out soon. |
Quoting sq452 (Reply 10): Their flight ops is obviously completely messed up to the point they are embarrassing themselves. |
Quoting 9MMPQ (Reply 11): From 13Feb onwards this is a knock-on effect from 9M-MTA being AOG in KUL which was supposed to operate as MH52/13Feb. It still seems to be AOG. A couple of swaps in the A330 schedule arising from that since have also affected the PER flight 9M-MPD has mentioned. I can't trace back if there were other AOGs in he fleet or delays around that time but without knowing about that & other operational constraints they might have faced in their scheduling it would be going a bit overboard to say |
Quoting 9MMPQ (Reply 11): Anway, hope you'll have a good flight ! |