Moderators: jsumali2, richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
Quoting jfk777 (Thread starter): f GOL wants to be truly competitive then they should fly nonstop, if that means they need 757 then so be it. 757 should be able to handle Rio and Sao Paulo to MIA. |
Quoting frostyj (Reply 4): I don't understand how a 737 could be flown from Miami to Rio?? |
Quoting jfk777 (Thread starter): What is the point of GOL flying to Miami with 737-800 when the market from Brazil is well flown by AA, TAM and Azul to Florida ? |
Quoting airbazar (Reply 6): TAM didn't seem to have a problem operating the A320 to MIA for many years. |
Quoting SCL767 (Reply 7): AA doesn't seem to have a problem operating the A319 to Brazil from MIA. |
Quoting luv2fly (Reply 1): I don't understand why it has to be a 757 or a wide body? I mean Copa makes the trek from Panama down to EZE on a 737! Just cause other airlines fly widebodies on routes that means every airline should? |
Quoting airbazar (Reply 6): TAM didn't seem to have a problem operating the A320 to MIA for many years. |
Quoting SCL767 (Reply 7): Reply 6):TAM didn't seem to have a problem operating the A320 to MIA for many years. AA doesn't seem to have a problem operating the A319 to Brazil from MIA. |
Quoting Rafabozzolla (Reply 8): Those flights were/are from MAO, MAO-MIA is 2402mi, well within the reach. GRU-MIA, on the other hand is 4072mi. |
Quoting jfk777 (Thread starter): What is the point of GOL flying to Miami with 737-800 when the market from Brazil is well flown by AA, TAM and Azul to Florida ? If GOL wants to be truly competitive then they should fly nonstop, if that means they need 757 then so be it. 757 should be able to handle Rio and Sao Paulo to MIA. |
Quoting C010T3 (Reply 2): If AA, Azul and TAM were truly covering the market, Copa would have no chance. Gol is only mimicking Copa, but their struggle in the market is an issue whose roots can be traced back to their culture, brand and market positioning. |
Quoting LimaFoxTango (Reply 5): Easy, they stop in SDQ and PUJ. |
Quoting SCL767 (Reply 3): After GOL acquired Varig in 2007 GOL did operate scheduled 767 flights to MIA. However it was a complete disaster for the airline and within a year it grounded its entire fleet of 767s and only used them for certain charter operations |
Quoting dfwjim1 (Reply 21): |
Quoting Rafabozzolla (Reply 20): G3 used to fly MIA-MAO-BEL-FOR on a daily basis with 320 around 2007. G3 has never operated Airbus planes. |
Quoting richierich (Reply 18): Gol does not fly MIA-SDQ-PUJ-GRU |
Quoting jetblue1965 (Reply 11): Any GRU-PTY-MIA traffic they capture is just icing on the cake. |
Quoting SJOtoLIR (Reply 26): The long-haul equipment doesn't fit into their business model. |
Quoting jfk777 (Reply 22): Why was GOL's Varig experience so bad ? was the plane a 767 ? Varig people telling GOL " they know" how to operate an international airline or the reverse "GOL telling RG people we know how to do it " ? TAM filling the role of Brazil's Flag airline ? While the 767 may not have been the perfect plane for RG to revive itself it should have been good enough for GRI to MIA, JFK and Europe. |
Quoting 2travel2know2 (Reply 29): Seems that G3 will go into the CCS-MIA market, its CCS-PUJ will connect with PUJ-MIA/MCO flights. |
Quoting LipeGIG (Reply 30): They already have millions blocked. I can't see the point to focus more on CCS. |