It may have had an inefficient cross section, but economy at 2 3 2 is great!
slightly off topic, but does the 767-400 have better economics e.g.: pax to weight?
I know: they don't offer the 400 any longer
A few weeks ago there was a thread speculating if United would order any new 767's to expand. Everybody seemed to poo-poo that idea and said that UA
would rather order more 787's. If I was to go back to that thread, is a 767 built today, with better economics, now not be viable for a pax airline because (IF
THEY DID WANT MORE 767's) there would be an equal backlog, vs before the FedEx order?