Moderators: jsumali2, richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
Quoting KarelXWB (Thread starter): - 48x Economy Comfort, 3-3-3 setup @ 35" pitch |
Quoting r2rho (Reply 1): Is 8-abreast asking for too much? Same thing goes for the 777's: their Y+ is still 10-abreast instead of 9. |
Quoting r2rho (Reply 1): Is 8-abreast asking for too much? Same thing goes for the 777's: their Y+ is still 10-abreast instead of 9. While I am aware that the KL product is a true Y+ and not a J- like other airlines, I think 8-abreast 787's and 9-abreast 777 is the minimum to call it Y+. I am disappointed. |
Quoting r2rho (Reply 1): Furthermore, I assume these will be with the new slimmer seats, adding kneeroom at the expense of padding - which doesn't look too comfortable for an 8hr+ flight... |
Quoting r2rho (Reply 1): Is 8-abreast asking for too much? Same thing goes for the 777's: their Y+ is still 10-abreast instead of 9. While I am aware that the KL product is a true Y+ and not a J- like other airlines, I think 8-abreast 787's and 9-abreast 777 is the minimum to call it Y+. I am disappointed. |
Quoting 7673mech (Reply 10): Everytime an interior is discussed the 8, 9 and 10 across debate comes up. Can we let it go at some point - it isn't changing - never will - here to stay. |
Quoting 7673mech (Reply 10): Everytime an interior is discussed the 8, 9 and 10 across debate comes up. Can we let it go at some point - it isn't changing - never will - here to stay. |
Quoting spacecookie (Reply 4): |
Quoting jfk777 (Reply 5): The Cathay Pacific J class seat sets the standard again. |
Quoting kaitak (Reply 9): That was my first reaction as well. 9 abreast in Y is bad enough, but if you pay a premium and still get 9 abreast, that's a bit lousy, but I guess it is consistent with other aircraft in the KLM fleet. |
Quoting 817Dreamliiner (Reply 12): I agree, but I do wonder sometimes if thinning the armrests in the 9 across configuration will make any difference on the 787. |
Quoting 7673mech (Reply 10): Everytime an interior is discussed the 8, 9 and 10 across debate comes up. Can we let it go at some point - it isn't changing - never will - here to stay. |
Quoting PlaneAdmirer (Reply 11): Amen.... People won't pay for more comfort and those who will and/or can do. |
Quoting qfvhoqa (Reply 14): That doesn't help with seat width at shoulder height though. |
Quoting spacecookie (Reply 4): I don't know why they do this specially when I pay economy plus. |
Quoting wingman (Reply 8): And the Dutch are the largest people on the planet |
Quoting qfvhoqa (Reply 14): I believe the premium KL charge over regular Y is minimal compared to Y+ on other carriers like BA. |
Quoting MIflyer12 (Reply 21): Hmm - Delta 777-200LR delivered February 2008? That's more than a year before US started getting A332s with Contour seats. |
Quoting KarelXWB (Thread starter): - 48x Economy Comfort, 3-3-3 setup |
Quoting scbriml (Reply 20): 9-across in premium economy on a 787? Epic fail |
Quoting qfvhoqa (Reply 14): I believe the premium KL charge over regular Y is minimal compared to Y+ on other carriers like BA. |
Quoting Viscount724 (Reply 25): Quoting scbriml (Reply 20):9-across in premium economy on a 787? Epic fail It's not premium economy which is a separate class of service. The KL economy comfort product is like UA and DL Y+ which uses standard Y class seating but a few inches of additional seat pitch, more seat recline, and seating at the front of the cabin to speed up boarding and deplaning. Far more passengers are willing to pay a small surcharge for that type of product than for a true premium economy product where the are is often twice (or more) the Y class fare. |
Quoting r2rho (Reply 26): Nevertheless, I insist on asking for 8/9 abreast 787/777 for Y+. |