Moderators: jsumali2, richierich, ua900, hOMSaR

 
aa87
Topic Author
Posts: 284
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2005 11:37 am

Tenerife 1977 - Why 747 Service To Las Palmas?

Wed Jul 29, 2015 8:53 pm

I'm wondering if anyone knows why PA and KLM had 747 service to Las Palmas ? were those scheduled or charter flights ? Was Las Palmas a hot destination then ? Not directly relevant for the accident but I always wondered why PA and KLM were flying 747s to Las Palmas. Why didn't most tourists connect through Spain ? I'm sure the islands are beautiful, just curious how there was enough demand for direct 747 service from multiple carriers in the 70s.
 
GARUDAROD
Posts: 1150
Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2000 4:39 am

RE: Tenerife 1977 - Why 747 Service To Las Palmas?

Wed Jul 29, 2015 9:00 pm

If I'm not mistaken both aircraft where charters operating to bring passengers to a cruise
ship departing from the region.
Cargo doesn't whine, moan, or complain
 
kaitak
Posts: 9838
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 1999 5:49 am

RE: Tenerife 1977 - Why 747 Service To Las Palmas?

Wed Jul 29, 2015 9:00 pm

Not sure about the KLM aircraft, but the Pan Am passengers were on a fly-cruise, to meet a ship at LPA.

I think the KLM flight was a standard IT flight; there were several aircraft diverted to TFN, including a Sabena 747 and various other charter flights.
 
SpaceshipDC10
Posts: 6910
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2013 11:44 am

RE: Tenerife 1977 - Why 747 Service To Las Palmas?

Wed Jul 29, 2015 9:03 pm

Quoting aa87 (Thread starter):
Not directly relevant for the accident but I always wondered why PA and KLM were flying 747s to Las Palmas. Why didn't most tourists connect through Spain ? I'm sure the islands are beautiful, just curious how there was enough demand for direct 747 service from multiple carriers in the 70s.

KL flight was a charter from the Netherlands probably filled up with tourists looking for some sun and sea over the winter period, even though it was already the end of March. Pan Am, iirc, was on a scheduled flight. You have to remember it was almost 40 years, that is things were very different than nowadays. Then why connect through Spain when you can get a direct flight there, especially when flying from within Europe?
 
PanHAM
Posts: 9719
Joined: Fri May 06, 2005 6:44 pm

RE: Tenerife 1977 - Why 747 Service To Las Palmas?

Wed Jul 29, 2015 9:04 pm

Quite common in the 70s to fly wide Body Equipment to the Canary Islands or destinations in the Mediterranean like PMI or AGP.

Condor had 747s flying parallel with LTU Tristars on DUS-PMI or to the Canaries as well. These were, like the KL flight charter flights.
We had DC8s, 707/720s and CV990 besieds DC9 and the 727s or BAC 1-11 on these jobs while it is mostly boring 320s and 738s nowadays.

[Edited 2015-07-29 14:22:31]
Was Erlauben Erdogan!!!
 
User avatar
Aesma
Posts: 12743
Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2009 6:14 am

RE: Tenerife 1977 - Why 747 Service To Las Palmas?

Wed Jul 29, 2015 9:20 pm

Yeah, don't forget medium range small planes just didn't exist at the time.
New Technology is the name we give to stuff that doesn't work yet. Douglas Adams
 
klwright69
Posts: 2707
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2000 4:22 am

RE: Tenerife 1977 - Why 747 Service To Las Palmas?

Wed Jul 29, 2015 9:23 pm

Yes, interesting observations. The Canary Islands are obviously quite far from the western USA, and the PA flight began in LAX. A lot of the passengers were from California and Washington state. I did some research into the people on the PA flight a long time ago.

There was even a group of around 65 people from a retirement community in southern California on the flight, and only 10 survived. Of course they were going on the cruise. Several instances where one spouse survived and the other died also. Actually 275 boarded on LAX.
https://www.awesomestories.com/asset/view/PAN-AM-1736-MISSED-EXIT-Tenerife-Deadliest-Air-Accident

A long ways to go to go on a cruise. Wow.

[Edited 2015-07-29 14:25:25]
 
iahcsr
Posts: 4777
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 1999 2:59 pm

RE: Tenerife 1977 - Why 747 Service To Las Palmas?

Wed Jul 29, 2015 9:49 pm

Both flights were diverted there due to an explosion at LPA..... The fog rolled in after they arrived. PA was cleared to depart first, but had to wait as KL was bumping fuel and blocked PA.
Working Hard, Flying Right Friendly....
 
timz
Posts: 6581
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 1999 7:43 am

RE: Tenerife 1977 - Why 747 Service To Las Palmas?

Thu Jul 30, 2015 1:29 am

The 10/76 OAG shows SA 747s to LPA-- no others.

Suspect PA never scheduled flights to the Canary Islands. In any case, in summer 1977 they didn't.
 
Viscount724
Posts: 19316
Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 7:32 pm

RE: Tenerife 1977 - Why 747 Service To Las Palmas?

Thu Jul 30, 2015 2:28 am

Quoting SpaceshipDC10 (Reply 3):
Pan Am, iirc, was on a scheduled flight

No, Pan Am was also a charter, for a cruise I believe. Pan Am never operated scheduled services to the Canary Islands.
 
747buff
Posts: 679
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2001 3:05 pm

RE: Tenerife 1977 - Why 747 Service To Las Palmas?

Thu Jul 30, 2015 3:43 am

Both flights were charters. In fact, I remember reading somewhere that the PA 747 was to deadhead to Paris, then operate a scheduled flight back to the U.S. Also, the PA flight was numbered 1736. Did this by chance correspond to the reg (N736PA)?
At Eastern, we earn our wings every day!
 
aa87
Topic Author
Posts: 284
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2005 11:37 am

RE: Tenerife 1977 - Why 747 Service To Las Palmas?

Thu Jul 30, 2015 4:00 am

Thanks for replies. I did some more digging and yes indeed both were charters. These tragedies are always horrific, but this one had the added irony that in a larger sense neither plane should have been at Tenerife in the first place. The tower wasn't properly staffed, communication difficulties, field was never designed for so many ac at once, especially jumbos. I'd even bet those may have been the first 747s ever at Tenerife. Add sudden fog and a rushed, complacent, overly experienced and overconfident Dutch captain, and the tragedy chain link is complete. The terrorists who planted the bombs at LPA really did kill almost 600 people.
 
n729pa
Posts: 1153
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 6:16 pm

RE: Tenerife 1977 - Why 747 Service To Las Palmas?

Thu Jul 30, 2015 8:01 am

N736PA as I recall had an eventful history

She operated the first commercial 747 service JFK-LHR 22/1/70 as a substitute for the original aircraft (N733PA) that developed a technical fault.

She was the first 747 hijacked too on 2/8/70.
 
CiC
Posts: 75
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2010 6:51 am

RE: Tenerife 1977 - Why 747 Service To Las Palmas?

Thu Jul 30, 2015 2:22 pm

All Charters... As far as I know only Iberia (MAD-LPA-CCS) and SA (Europe-LPA fuel stop-JNB) were scheduled...
 
B737900
Posts: 226
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2010 10:44 pm

RE: Tenerife 1977 - Why 747 Service To Las Palmas?

Thu Jul 30, 2015 3:25 pm

Quoting iahcsr (Reply 7):
Both flights were diverted there due to an explosion at LPA.....
Quoting SpaceshipDC10 (Reply 3):

KL flight was a charter from the Netherlands
Quoting SpaceshipDC10 (Reply 3):
Pan Am, iirc, was on a scheduled flight.

Seems to be some confusion here. Whatever the reason for both aircraft being at Tenerife, fog played the major role in the tragedy.
Sounds like a Beaver on floats..........we're saved!!
 
Clydenairways
Posts: 1260
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 8:27 am

RE: Tenerife 1977 - Why 747 Service To Las Palmas?

Thu Jul 30, 2015 3:50 pm

Quoting aa87 (Thread starter):
I'm wondering if anyone knows why PA and KLM had 747 service to Las Palmas ?

747's were regularly used on holiday charter flights during the 70's and 80's. Also Holiday charters were also operated by legacy carriers a lot more than today.
EI, LH, SK, KL, SN, SR 747's could also be seen on holiday charters during that era.
 
TonyBurr
Posts: 1108
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2001 1:00 pm

RE: Tenerife 1977 - Why 747 Service To Las Palmas?

Thu Jul 30, 2015 6:29 pm

I was alive at that time. They were diversions due to problems at their destiantion airports. Neither was suppose to be there at all. They were not 747 destinations for either airport. I forget whether they were weather or airport safety diverions. I know they were not scheduled or charters.
 
AR385
Posts: 6935
Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2003 8:25 am

RE: Tenerife 1977 - Why 747 Service To Las Palmas?

Thu Jul 30, 2015 6:42 pm

I seem to recall that due to this accident a requirement came into being that forbade two airplanes to be on the active at the same time. Am I wrong?
 
iberiadc852
Posts: 301
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 8:23 am

RE: Tenerife 1977 - Why 747 Service To Las Palmas?

Thu Jul 30, 2015 6:57 pm

Quoting kaitak (Reply 2):
I think the KLM flight was a standard IT flight; there were several aircraft diverted to TFN, including a Sabena 747 and various other charter flights.

The Sabena 747, and a BAW L-1011 (among other charters), were not diverted. They were scheduled to TFN that day.
TFN received a Condor 747 every Thursday those times.
variety is the spice of life; that's what made the "old times" so good
 
rbavfan
Posts: 3534
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2015 5:53 am

RE: Tenerife 1977 - Why 747 Service To Las Palmas?

Thu Jul 30, 2015 8:00 pm

Las Palmas was a fuel stop for most carriers during the 70's in route to southern Africa. Stopping for fuel allowed for greater cargo loads or just because they needed it to fly the route. the 747 of 1970 did not have the range of the 747-400/747-8 series.
 
levg79
Posts: 928
Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2003 10:59 am

RE: Tenerife 1977 - Why 747 Service To Las Palmas?

Thu Jul 30, 2015 8:05 pm

Quoting 747buff (Reply 10):
he PA flight was numbered 1736. Did this by chance correspond to the reg (N736PA)?

Absolutely! I remember reading about an interview with Robert Bragg years ago and he said that the charter flight numbers were based on the aircraft registration. He also mentioned in the interview that PA did not normally fly to Canary Islands and while bidding on this trip he actually had to look at the map to see where this destination was.
A mile of runway takes you to the world. A mile of highway takes you a mile.
 
rbavfan
Posts: 3534
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2015 5:53 am

RE: Tenerife 1977 - Why 747 Service To Las Palmas?

Thu Jul 30, 2015 8:08 pm

Quoting Viscount724 (Reply 9):

But PanAm did regularly stop for fuel as did canadian & EU carriers. Remember guys Pan Am flew mostly 747-100 in these years 4880nm max range with 385 passenger. PanAm flew JFK-Johannesburg in the 70's 6936nm Even KLM with their 747-100's was 4697nm from Frankfurt. Both needed fuel stops. Most African countries did not allow flyover of their lands due to apartheid. The 747 could not do it non-stop. One of Las Palmas most consistent business was a giant gas station.

[Edited 2015-07-30 13:15:45]

[Edited 2015-07-30 13:16:34]

[Edited 2015-07-30 13:18:28]
 
brilondon
Posts: 3069
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2005 6:56 am

RE: Tenerife 1977 - Why 747 Service To Las Palmas?

Thu Jul 30, 2015 8:37 pm

I believe that both aircraft were diverted due to weather and neither were supposed to be there.
Rush forever Closer To My Heart
 
User avatar
Adipasquale
Posts: 831
Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2015 4:39 pm

RE: Tenerife 1977 - Why 747 Service To Las Palmas?

Thu Jul 30, 2015 8:48 pm

Quoting brilondon (Reply 22):
I believe that both aircraft were diverted due to weather and neither were supposed to be there.

No, as stated before, they were diverted to TFN because of an explosion at their original destination of LPA. Weather played a factor in the fact that fog obscured the runway of TFN so that KL 4805 was on the runway at the same time PA 1736 was cleared for takeoff. The fact that nonstandard terminology was used by the crew of KL 4805 led to PA 1736 being cleared for takeoff while KL 4805 was obstructing the runway. So really it was a combination of the weather and the nonstandard terminology that caused the accident.
DH8A DH8B CR1 CR2 CR7 CR9 E45 E70 E75 E90 D93 M88 318 319 320 321 333 343 712 732 733 734 73G 738 739 744 752 753 762 763 772 77L 77W
 
cedarjet
Posts: 8768
Joined: Mon May 24, 1999 1:12 am

RE: Tenerife 1977 - Why 747 Service To Las Palmas?

Thu Jul 30, 2015 8:49 pm

Where you guys getting your facts from?! PA was a scheduled flights, diversions due to wx?! This is madness. Both charter flights, both diverted from Gran Canaria due to a bomb explosion in the terminal there. How can anyone on here not know the basic facts yet be posting on this thread.
fly Saha Air 707s daily from Tehran's downtown Mehrabad to Mashhad, Kish Island and Ahwaz
 
User avatar
deltacto
Posts: 459
Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 5:49 pm

RE: Tenerife 1977 - Why 747 Service To Las Palmas?

Thu Jul 30, 2015 8:52 pm

Quoting brilondon (Reply 22):
I believe that both aircraft were diverted due to weather and neither were supposed to be there.

The Pan Am 747 and KLM 747 were both flying as charters to Las Palmas. A terrorist group set off a bomb in the Las Palmas terminal, closing that airport. Pan Am and KLM - along with several other large jets - were then diverted to Los Rodeos on Tenerife. Lots of good info here

http://www.airdisaster.com/special/special-pa1736.shtml

adipasquale and cedarjet ... my apologies ... i did not see your posts before i posted mine

[Edited 2015-07-30 13:54:25]
 
aa87
Topic Author
Posts: 284
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2005 11:37 am

RE: Tenerife 1977 - Why 747 Service To Las Palmas?

Fri Jul 31, 2015 12:52 am

Guys, I guess I wasn't clear. I know the destination was Las Palmas and both were diverted to Tenerife due to the terrorist bombing at destination. I was really just wondering why PA and KLM had 747s scheduled for Las Palmas in the first place. Charters make perfect sense. It is interesting how jumbos were used back when there were far fewer of them.

On a related note, was it bc of this accident that standard terminology became using "take off" only when giving or reading back TO clearance, and using "departure" for all other comm ? I recall hearing that many years ago, and when I've listened to ATC seems that is the custom (eg, "prepare for departure").

Quoting adipasquale (Reply 23):
The fact that nonstandard terminology was used by the crew of KL 4805 led to PA 1736 being cleared for takeoff while KL 4805 was obstructing the runway.

PA was still backtaxiing on the runway when KLM rolled without clearance - but you're absolutely correct that use of non-standard terminology allowed situation to occur where KLM captain thought/assumed they were cleared, and ATC thought/assumed KLM was holding in position, and fog prevented visual by everyone until it was too late.

Quoting AR385 (Reply 17):
I seem to recall that due to this accident a requirement came into being that forbade two airplanes to be on the active at the same time. Am I wrong?

Wasn't that always the rule ? This was what I characterize as a communication accident, not a clearance or operational accident.

Quoting iberiadc852 (Reply 18):
The Sabena 747, and a BAW L-1011 (among other charters), were not diverted. They were scheduled to TFN that day.
TFN received a Condor 747 every Thursday those times.

Interesting, so the Canary Islands were clearly very popular destinations. Has anyone here been there recently ? does this tragedy still hang over the islands ?
 
B737900
Posts: 226
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2010 10:44 pm

RE: Tenerife 1977 - Why 747 Service To Las Palmas?

Fri Jul 31, 2015 1:47 am

Back during that time my father-in-law was a captain for PanAm flying 747's. My wife and I were living in bush Alaska and heard of the accident over the radio. We knew he was out on a trip but knew not where. We called home. He was safe but the family knew the PanAm crew. It was a small family. Tragic day.
Sounds like a Beaver on floats..........we're saved!!
 
Viscount724
Posts: 19316
Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 7:32 pm

RE: Tenerife 1977 - Why 747 Service To Las Palmas?

Fri Jul 31, 2015 2:30 am

Quoting aa87 (Reply 26):
It is interesting how jumbos were used back when there were far fewer of them.

There were roughly 700 wide bodies in service at the time of the Tenerife event in March 1977. Around 300 747s, 230 DC-10s, 140 L-1011s and 25 A300s had been delivered by then. Considering how much smaller the air travel market was in those pre-deregulation days, and how much lower average load factors were then (rarely much over the 60% range), 700 widebodies was a lot of capacity at the time.

Pan Am had 37 747s in service then, including their first half dozen 747SPs, and March wasn't the peak season, so they were probably happy with any charter business they could get, considering that they had ordered far too many 747s, one of Pan Am's problems for many years.
 
PanHAM
Posts: 9719
Joined: Fri May 06, 2005 6:44 pm

RE: Tenerife 1977 - Why 747 Service To Las Palmas?

Fri Jul 31, 2015 5:55 am

Quoting rbavfan (Reply 21):
But PanAm did regularly stop for fuel as did canadian & EU carriers. Remember guys Pan Am flew mostly 747-100 in these years 4880nm max range with 385 passenger. PanAm flew JFK-Johannesburg in the 70's 6936nm Even KLM with their 747-100's was 4697nm from Frankfurt. Both needed fuel stops. Most African countries did not allow flyover of their lands due to apartheid. The 747 could not do it non-stop. One of Las Palmas most consistent business was a giant gas station.

LPA was certainly not a fuel stop for PA and they served JNB mostly with the 747SP in the 70s. The logic fuel stop for NA Services was and is Ilha do Sal which is a bit south of the Canaries.
Also, Europea carriers could stop anywhere in Africa on the way to JNB, South African could not. Sal was a fuel stop for Europe as well, on some flights LPA too.
Was Erlauben Erdogan!!!
 
ACEregular
Posts: 578
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2003 8:00 am

RE: Tenerife 1977 - Why 747 Service To Las Palmas?

Fri Jul 31, 2015 7:00 am

As correctly stated by Cedar and others, both flights were charter flights. The PA flight had been chartered to join the Golden Odyssey cruise ship and cruise the Mediterranean. The KLM flight was a regular flight operated on behalf of Dutch tour operator Holland International. Onboard were three Holland International tour representatives travelling back to Gran Canaria which was their allocated resort destination. One of those representatives escaped death by choosing to stay over in Tenerife rather than continuing to Gran Canaria. Supposedly her boyfriend worked in Tenerife and she decided to leave the flight after the diversion, thus saving her life. She is the only person to surviving the flight though not actually onboard at the time,she did travel with them all from Amsterdam that morning.

The Canary Islands at the time were in the midst of the tourism boom that started in the 60's. Primarily as the result of the birth of the inclusive tour packages, making travel much more easily accessible to the general public. These islands are not really a primitive backwater, though certainly not quite to the standard North Americans probably expect and most definitely not primitive by anyone today's standards. They are a prime destination for many North Europeans, having a good infrastructure and abundant year round sunshine. Bear in mind they are only a four hour flight from the UK. A similar distance from NYC to Cancun to compare the two hotspots. I usually visit one of the Islands at least once a year. This year I have been to both Lanzarote and Tenerife. I have never encountered any locals who have talked of it hanging over their heads. You should consider though that TFN has had a chequered history. Prior to 77 there was the Spantax Convair crash which claimed all onboard and in 1980 a British charter flight crashed into terrain on it's descent to TFN again with a loss of all. Strangely just two years previously a new airport opened in the south of the island and had this flight been operated into TFS instead of TFN it most likely would never have flown into the terrain. At the time though the southern resorts were still in their infancy and possibly not quite as desirable as they are now. I do think that in most European travellers of a certain age do remember these events and where they occurred. Lessons have been learned but we don't forget.

[Edited 2015-07-31 00:15:59]
 
SCQ83
Posts: 5638
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 8:32 pm

RE: Tenerife 1977 - Why 747 Service To Las Palmas?

Fri Jul 31, 2015 7:12 am

Not trying to be picky, but it is Gran Canaria Airport. Las Palmas is just (the largest) city in the island of Gran Canaria.
 
wjcandee
Posts: 8557
Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2000 12:50 am

RE: Tenerife 1977 - Why 747 Service To Las Palmas?

Fri Jul 31, 2015 7:23 am

Quoting aa87 (Thread starter):
I'm wondering if anyone knows why PA and KLM had 747 service to Las Palmas ?

Wikipedia has most of the info. Both were charters to Las Palmas for cruises. PA for Royal Cruise Line and KLM for Holland International. They ended up at Tenerife (Los Rodeos Airport), a smaller regional airport, because terrorists exploded a bomb in a flower shop on the concourse at Las Palmas and there was the threat of a second. The staff at Los Rodeos had to park a bunch of planes, including multiple 747s.
 
factsonly
Posts: 2866
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 3:08 pm

RE: Tenerife 1977 - Why 747 Service To Las Palmas?

Fri Jul 31, 2015 7:25 am

Quoting rbavfan (Reply 21):
Even KLM with their 747-100's was 4697nm from Frankfurt.

KLM never operated B747-100 !

KLM was Boeing's first B747 customer to accept the B747-200B.


After the initial 747-100 model, Boeing developed the −100B, a higher maximum takeoff weight (MTOW) variant, and the −100SR (Short Range), with higher passenger capacity.

In 1971 Boeing increased the MTOW to allow more fuel and a longer range. The -200B featured more powerful engines and a higher MTOW.
 
User avatar
Buyantukhaa
Posts: 2327
Joined: Thu May 13, 2004 5:33 am

RE: Tenerife 1977 - Why 747 Service To Las Palmas?

Fri Jul 31, 2015 11:10 am

Quoting rbavfan (Reply 21):
Even KLM with their 747-100's was 4697nm from Frankfurt.

Surely they fly out of AMS not FRA...

Quoting aceregular (Reply 30):
Strangely just two years previously a new airport opened in the south of the island and had this flight been operated into TFS instead of TFN it most likely would never have flown into the terrain.

TFS opened only in 1978, even if most of its infrastructure was complete at the time of the disaster.
I scratch my head, therefore I am.
 
dennys
Posts: 689
Joined: Tue May 08, 2001 11:19 pm

RE: Tenerife 1977 - Why 747 Service To Las Palmas?

Fri Jul 31, 2015 4:02 pm

The EU carriers did not need a fuel stop , but a commercial stop such as NBO or FIH to fill up their huge 747s or DC10s on those days .

On the contrary SAA really needed a fuel stop like SID or LPA on their way to NYC or Europe .
 
timz
Posts: 6581
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 1999 7:43 am

RE: Tenerife 1977 - Why 747 Service To Las Palmas?

Fri Jul 31, 2015 5:17 pm

Quoting rbavfan (Reply 21):
PanAm flew JFK-Johannesburg in the 70's

Via Dakar, was it? Not via the Canaries, anyway.
 
Viscount724
Posts: 19316
Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 7:32 pm

RE: Tenerife 1977 - Why 747 Service To Las Palmas?

Sat Aug 01, 2015 1:47 am

Quoting timz (Reply 36):
Quoting rbavfan (Reply 21):
PanAm flew JFK-Johannesburg in the 70's

Via Dakar, was it? Not via the Canaries, anyway.

Pan Am's service in the early '70s was multi-stop with 707s. For example, in the April 29, 1973 timetable JNB was 2 x week with 707, one with 3 stops and one with 5 stops. Those were similar to routings operated in propeller days.

Routings:

JFK-ROB-ACC-FIH-JNB (ROB = Monrovia, Liberia)
JFK-DKR-ROB-ACC-LOS-FIH-JNB

By April '79 JNB was down to just 1 x week with a 707 and originated MIA with one stop at GIG, with 5th freedom rights GIG-JNB. The return flight made a fuel stop (no traffic rights) at CPT due JNB's high elevation, operating JNB-CPT-GIG-MIA.

They must have dropped JNB for a while as there was no service in the April 1980 timetable, but they returned some time prior to 1982.

In the September 1982 timetable JNB was once a week with a 747SP JFK-ABJ-JNB.

They dropped JNB permanently sometime thereafter. No service in 1985 or 1987 timetables.
 
Max Q
Posts: 8113
Joined: Wed May 09, 2001 12:40 pm

RE: Tenerife 1977 - Why 747 Service To Las Palmas?

Sat Aug 01, 2015 2:15 am

Quoting PanHAM (Reply 29):
LPA was certainly not a fuel stop for PA and they served JNB mostly with the 747SP in the 70s.

From where did they fly to JNB ?


Was it non stop from JFK ?

Quoting dennys (Reply 35):
On the contrary SAA really needed a fuel stop like SID or LPA on their way to NYC or Europe .

Did SAA ever operate their Classics non stop to or from Europe ? I imagine their SP's could.

[Edited 2015-07-31 19:26:20]
The best contribution to safety is a competent Pilot.


GGg
 
User avatar
Revelation
Posts: 23462
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 9:37 pm

RE: Tenerife 1977 - Why 747 Service To Las Palmas?

Sat Aug 01, 2015 2:24 am

Quoting clydenairways (Reply 15):
747's were regularly used on holiday charter flights during the 70's and 80's.
Quoting aceregular (Reply 30):
Primarily as the result of the birth of the inclusive tour packages, making travel much more easily accessible to the general public.

Also charters were not subject to a lot of the strict airline pricing regulations that scheduled flights had during that era, so in many cases they could fill up 707s with bargain hunters.

This led to various dubious packaging of charters with $1 fees to join affiliated "cultural appreciation societies" that allowed one to access such charters.

Ref: http://news.google.com/newspapers?ni...IBAJ&pg=2360,5673536&hl=en

Note I am NOT saying that's what happened in the tragic accident, I'm just responding to why the Canaries supported 747 service.
Wake up to find out that you are the eyes of the world
The heart has its beaches, its homeland and thoughts of its own
Wake now, discover that you are the song that the morning brings
The heart has its seasons, its evenings and songs of its own
 
Viscount724
Posts: 19316
Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 7:32 pm

RE: Tenerife 1977 - Why 747 Service To Las Palmas?

Sat Aug 01, 2015 3:03 am

Quoting Max Q (Reply 38):
Quoting PanHAM (Reply 29):
LPA was certainly not a fuel stop for PA and they served JNB mostly with the 747SP in the 70s.

From where did they fly to JNB ?


Was it non stop from JFK ?

As mentioned in Reply 37, in 1982 it was JFK-ABJ (Abidjan)-JNB once a week with 747SP. I doubt the SP had enough range for JFK-JNB nonstop without payload restrictions. It's about 400 miles further than SYD-LAX. And northbound would be even more of a challenge with JNB's 5,558 ft. elevation

I believe at some point Pan Am also used the 747SP briefly on the MIA-GIG-JNB route previously operated for a while with 707s (with a fuel stop at CPT on the return trip).
 
Max Q
Posts: 8113
Joined: Wed May 09, 2001 12:40 pm

RE: Tenerife 1977 - Why 747 Service To Las Palmas?

Sat Aug 01, 2015 3:43 am

Interesting,amazing how widespread the PAA network was.


Rio to Johannesburg was and still is a pretty lonely route, especially when Pan Am was operating it.
The best contribution to safety is a competent Pilot.


GGg
 
User avatar
777Jet
Posts: 6982
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2014 7:29 am

RE: Tenerife 1977 - Why 747 Service To Las Palmas?

Sat Aug 01, 2015 4:50 am

Quoting iahcsr (Reply 7):
Both flights were diverted there due to an explosion at LPA..... The fog rolled in after they arrived. PA was cleared to depart first, but had to wait as KL was bumping fuel and blocked PA.

And then the ultimate price was paid because Jacob Louis Veldhuyzen van Zanten decided to takeoff without being 'cleared for takeoff'  
Quoting AR385 (Reply 17):
I seem to recall that due to this accident a requirement came into being that forbade two airplanes to be on the active at the same time. Am I wrong?

That would still not prevent nonsense like this form occurring:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jhAd5Dki1no

Luckily the KAL pilot displayed typical KAL pilot skills  
Quoting cedarjet (Reply 24):
This is madness.

What van Zanten did was madness...
DC10-10/30,MD82/88/90, 717,727,732/3/4/5/7/8/9ER,742/4,752/3,763/ER,772/E/L/3/W,788/9, 306,320,321,332/3,346,359,388
 
Ned Kelly
Posts: 408
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2001 8:14 am

RE: Tenerife 1977 - Why 747 Service To Las Palmas?

Sat Aug 01, 2015 5:54 am

Quoting 747buff (Reply 10):
. Also, the PA flight was numbered 1736. Did this by chance correspond to the reg (N736PA)?

Yes you are correct. Pan Am when operating charters always used the registration number preceded by a 1. I remember during my spotting days in the 70's catching the registration number on my airband radio from the call sign, although these were mainly 707's.

Quoting iberiadc852 (Reply 18):
The Sabena 747, and a BAW L-1011 (among other charters), were not diverted. They were scheduled to TFN that day.

I remember seeing a picture of the line up of the aircraft stuck on the ramp for a few days after the accident. I always recall that I remember seeing a British Airtours (Charter arm of BA) 707-436 and a Sabena (may have been a Sobelair) 707-329, don't recall seeing a BA L10 or an SN 747, but I am happy to be corrected on this. Someone once (maybe even on this site) gave a full list of aircraft and registrations of those aircraft stuck at TFN. Perhaps someone has this list here?



Quoting Viscount724 (Reply 37):
By April '79 JNB was down to just 1 x week with a 707 and originated MIA with one stop at GIG, with 5th freedom rights GIG-JNB. The return flight made a fuel stop (no traffic rights) at CPT due JNB's high elevation, operating JNB-CPT-GIG-MIA.

I was in JNB Aug/Sep 1979 and I only ever saw PA operate a 707, never a 747.
 
User avatar
modernArt
Posts: 519
Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2003 2:23 pm

RE: Tenerife 1977 - Why 747 Service To Las Palmas?

Sat Aug 01, 2015 6:05 am

Quoting Ned Kelly (Reply 43):
I remember seeing a picture of the line up of the aircraft stuck on the ramp for a few days after the accident.

Is this the ramp in the background or is this a different airport?
 
Ned Kelly
Posts: 408
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2001 8:14 am

RE: Tenerife 1977 - Why 747 Service To Las Palmas?

Sat Aug 01, 2015 6:34 am

Quoting modernart (Reply 44):
Is this the ramp in the background or is this a different airport?

Thanks for the photo, It does look around the right time given the colour schemes and the wreckage at the front is a bit of a giveaway! Just to chuck a spanner in the works, any idea of the exact date this photo was taken, could it possibly be that this photo was when the airport reopened to arriving traffic? I do recall that journalist were present at the airport for a while after the accidents and the reopening of the airport was reported in the news. There must be another picture taken from another angle showing a KT 707 & SN 707, I tried a Google search but couldn't find it. I was 15 at the time of the accident, and perhaps I am loosing my marbles and memory a bit.
 
PanHAM
Posts: 9719
Joined: Fri May 06, 2005 6:44 pm

RE: Tenerife 1977 - Why 747 Service To Las Palmas?

Sat Aug 01, 2015 6:54 am

Tere's a Sterlng Caravelle and a CV990 wih must be Spntax visible in that pictre. The first a/c behind the 747 is a 707
Was Erlauben Erdogan!!!
 
Ned Kelly
Posts: 408
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2001 8:14 am

RE: Tenerife 1977 - Why 747 Service To Las Palmas?

Sat Aug 01, 2015 8:10 am

Quoting PanHAM (Reply 46):
Tere's a Sterlng Caravelle and a CV990 wih must be Spntax visible in that pictre. The first a/c behind the 747 is a 707

You are right about the sterling Caravelle, but the aircraft behind the 747 looks like a DC8-50 looking at the engines, but can't recall what airline it would be. The aircraft behind that looks like a Conair of Scandinavia Boeing 720, and behind that is an Aviaco DC8.
 
User avatar
cougar15
Posts: 1431
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 6:10 pm

RE: Tenerife 1977 - Why 747 Service To Las Palmas?

Sat Aug 01, 2015 9:27 am

Quoting aa87 (Thread starter):
I'm wondering if anyone knows why PA and KLM had 747 service to Las Palmas ? were those scheduled or charter flights ? Was Las Palmas a hot destination then ? Not directly relevant for the accident but I always wondered why PA and KLM were flying 747s to Las Palmas. Why didn't most tourists connect through Spain ? I'm sure the islands are beautiful, just curious how there was enough demand for direct 747 service from multiple carriers in the 70s.

go to Youtube, there is a 2 hour documentary/dcudrama from the early ACI/Mayday series there & answers all your questions
some you lose, others you can´t win!
 
ACEregular
Posts: 578
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2003 8:00 am

RE: Tenerife 1977 - Why 747 Service To Las Palmas?

Sat Aug 01, 2015 9:40 am

Quoting timz (Reply 36):
Quoting Buyantukhaa (Reply 34):
Quoting rbavfan (Reply 21):
Even KLM with their 747-100's was 4697nm from Frankfurt.

Surely they fly out of AMS not FRA...

Quoting aceregular (Reply 30):
Strangely just two years previously a new airport opened in the south of the island and had this flight been operated into TFS instead of TFN it most likely would never have flown into the terrain.

TFS opened only in 1978, even if most of its infrastructure was complete at the time of the disaster.



I am aware TFS opened in 1978, two years previous to the 1980 Dan Air crash which occurred during an approach to TFN, the crash I was referencing with relation to TFN's chequered history and not saying TFS was operational at the time of the PA/KL collision.

Also does anyone know how long the runway was out of use and how long the stranded aircraft were at TFN. I was thinking perhaps they got a dispensation for using the taxiway to get airborne.

Popular Searches On Airliners.net

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos