Moderators: jsumali2, richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
Quoting AA737-823 (Reply 1): That's insane, and it will never work. |
Quoting [email protected] (Reply 7): It's inevitably Americans who say such things. How dare a very profitable airline from a economically fast-growing countries order so many aircraft? |
Quoting billreid (Reply 11): It does hold a lot of risk if the order is completed. |
Quoting billreid (Reply 11): Wondering if it will help Boeing as well as a full Airbus order book might make Boeing slots more attractive. I see AB and BA walking step by step, side by side selling similar levels of products. Neither company will ever get a true advantage in sales over the other. |
Quoting chiad (Reply 5): IMHO the "planned" 60 frames per month production rate now is inevitable, rather how fast it can be done. Even if was to happen from January 1st 2016 the backlog would sill cover almost 6 years of production. With current production rate it would cover more than 8 years. |
Quoting Mortyman (Reply 13): Any chance of Airbus opening yet another production line ? |
Quoting MrHMSH (Reply 15): Seeing as this is an order for a stupid number of A320neos from an airline in a country where the average wage is low, I'm expecting a statement explaining that this is a bogus order that Airbus have logged just to put the numbers up... |
Quoting PM (Reply 16): Seeing as this is an order for a stupid number of A320neos from an airline in a country where the average wage is low, I'm expecting a statement explaining that this is a bogus order that Airbus have logged just to put the numbers up... |
Quoting lightsaber (Reply 19): India should be growing faster economically than they are. |
Quoting starbucks (Reply 6): 4161 to be exact |
Quoting scouseflyer (Reply 18): I remember when they ordered their first 100 planes and there much skepticism about whether they'd take any and the full order was completed last year. |
Quoting racercoup (Reply 20): These orders have no real meaning because we don't know the terms. Deliveries could be spread out over 30 years. Indigo already had 180 waiting to be delivered, this order brings the total outstanding to 430. Certainly a lot for an airline that is currently operating only 97 frames. Whatever, in the end it's deliveries that count and that is a very different story. |
Quoting AA737-823 (Reply 1): That's insane, and it will never work. |
Quoting ap305 (Reply 22): If this was any other Indian carrier, I would have had a good laugh... Indigo thrives and will continue to do so. |
Quoting racercoup (Reply 20): These orders have no real meaning because we don't know the terms |
Quoting [email protected] (Reply 7): Quoting AA737-823 (Reply 1): That's insane, and it will never work. It's inevitably Americans who say such things. How dare a very profitable airline from a economically fast-growing countries order so many aircraft? |
Quoting chiad (Reply 2): IndiGo should have a NEO backlog of 430 |
Quoting holzmann (Reply 17): ^That's a low bar to meet. |
Quoting racercoup (Reply 20): These orders have no real meaning because we don't know the terms. |
Quoting ODwyerPW (Reply 27): Pearson, I think you missed his sarcasm. I interpreted it as jest. |
Quoting PW100 (Reply 26): Oh really? So the 150 77X order by EK must then really be the ultimate of meaningless . . . : |
Quoting chiad (Thread starter): The long awaited Indigo order is finally firm! Flight Global reports! http://www.flightglobal.com/news/art...5764/ |
Quoting BobMUC (Reply 4): P.S.: Not bad for the summer break in Toulouse! |
Quoting chiad (Reply 5): IMHO the "planned" 60 frames per month production rate now is inevitable, rather how fast it can be done. |
Quoting lightsaber (Reply 19): Amazing when you consider they have less than a hundred airframes. As India's most efficient carrier, this puts the other carriers on notice. I believe 6E will pull this off. The question is, what international airlines will they partner with to transfer traffic |
Quoting lightsaber (Reply 19): I've heard Airbus will try to go to 63 per month. The order backlog says the ramp is past due. |
Quoting scbriml (Reply 30): Congrats to Indigo and Airbus for this significant order. |
Quoting ODwyerPW (Reply 27): Pearson, I think you missed his sarcasm. I interpreted it as jest. Not all of us Americans drag our knuckles when we walk. A good number of us try to maintain a healthy world view. |
Quoting FlyingAY (Reply 12): Risk for whom? Airbus will not have difficulty reselling the slots should Indigo go belly up... |
Quoting glideslope (Reply 36): Given the safety record of India Based Airlines |
Quoting FlyingAY (Reply 12): Risk for whom? Airbus will not have difficulty reselling the slots should Indigo go belly up... |
Quoting MrHMSH (Reply 15): Seeing as this is an order for a stupid number of A320neos from an airline in a country where the average wage is low, I'm expecting a statement explaining that this is a bogus order that Airbus have logged just to put the numbers up... |
Quoting PW100 (Reply 26): So the 150 77X order by EK must then really be the ultimate of meaningless . . . : |
Quoting TC957 (Reply 39): It's an awful lot better than their safety record on their railway network or roads. |
Quoting billreid (Reply 41): I enjoy your cynicism. The problem is determining a real order from an inflated one. |
Quoting TC957 (Reply 39): It's an awful lot better than their safety record on their railway network or roads. |
Quoting scbriml (Reply 30): We don't know the terms of many orders, including over 1,000 737 orders for unidentified customers. * shrug * |
Quoting MrHMSH (Reply 43): Every firm order booked by Airbus is real. The customer may not take delivery of them, but they've put money down and Airbus will deliver the plane unless deferred or cancelled, at which point they reassign the slots. |
Quoting scouseflyer (Reply 18): ^That's a low bar to meet. |
Quoting ap305 (Reply 22): If this was any other Indian carrier, I would have had a good laugh... Indigo thrives and will continue to do so. |
Quoting ODwyerPW (Reply 27): Not all of us Americans drag our knuckles when we walk. A good number of us try to maintain a healthy world view. |
Quoting bgm (Reply 28): I doubt IndiGo will operate all 430 of them at the same time. As someone else noted, they usually keep aircraft for around 6 years. Congrats to 6E. I've flown them several times and they truly are the best airline in India. |
Quoting EPA001 (Reply 32): I agree. How they will put this off through the supply chain will be the great challenge to come. |
Quoting EPA001 (Reply 32): That is the first time I hear a number above 60 airplanes per month. |
Quoting billreid (Reply 40): For IndiGo if they take on all the aircraft. |
Quoting lightsaber (Reply 46): Airbus will ramp their airframes and will have no patience having to wait because engines were promised to Boeing... |
Quoting astuteman (Reply 23): For now, at least, that gives the A32X NEO 56% of the market since the launch of the 737 MAX (3593 vs 2835). |
Quoting glideslope (Reply 36): Given the safety record of India Based Airlines, and this being a Indian Based LCC let's pray it's not "belly up" literally. |