Moderators: jsumali2, richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
Quoting KLRU (Reply 51): With added US pre clearance at ARN it will be even better. I read that it is expected to be completed in about a year from now. |
Quoting johnboy (Reply 52): I was worrying about some of our Miami fanboys' mental health on here. |
Quoting Mortyman (Reply 39): As mentioned above, one of the reasons why OSL is getting route to Miami is because of Norwegians interest for cruise. Cruise is alot more populare with Norwegians than Danes or Swedes and SAS will no doubt be interested in getting these to and from their cruise. Some numbers: |
Quoting runway23 (Reply 2): Why is LAX operating from ARN rather than CPH, surely the market is larger from CPH ? |
Quoting TR (Reply 17): White it is correct that Sweden is the largest country, a larger part of population live closer to CPH than ARN. This is part of the historical reason to have CPH as a hub. Again looking to ARN is politics, not rational thinking. |
Quoting Mortyman (Reply 33): He says that seafood operators have indicated that they will be able to fill a lot of capacity over Miami. Marine Harvest has also a processing plant in South Florida, where fish are processed into finished products for the market. |
Quoting Someone83 (Reply 45): They said they are in negotiation for either extent the A340 leases or to lease newer aircraft (most likely more 330s) |
Quoting DolphinAir747 (Reply 54): Does Norwegian Cruise Lines have its head office in Norway? If so that could drive business traffic. |
Quoting TR (Reply 5): Said before - nothing in SAS happens out of logic but stupid politics. It makes no sense at all to spread routes across all Nordics rather than having one hub and then a few direct daily flights from the other airports to EWR and ORD. |
Quoting jeppelainen (Reply 49): Will SK adjust their ARN-EWR timetable so they can use only 2 planes for ARN-LAX-ARN-EWR-ARN? |
Quoting Navigator (Reply 55): Quoting runway23 (Reply 2): Why is LAX operating from ARN rather than CPH, surely the market is larger from CPH ? Thats not the case. The market has always been larger from Stockholm. |
Quoting Mortyman (Reply 58): However, Royal Caribbean has their head office in Oslo, Norway. |
Quoting MAH4546 (Reply 63): Quoting Navigator (Reply 55):Quoting runway23 (Reply 2):Why is LAX operating from ARN rather than CPH, surely the market is larger from CPH ?Thats not the case. The market has always been larger from Stockholm. No, CPH-LAX is larger, and by quite a large amount (around one-third larger). |
Quoting Navigator (Reply 64): You are wrong. You have to measure traffic flows to prove that. All traffic originationg from Stockholm through CPH has to be extracted from CPH figures. Market research when SAS was actually flying from CPH to LAX showed that a large portion originated from Stockholm. |
Quoting HELyes (Reply 41): His cousins are already there, Finnair (A333) serve MIA again next winter season |
Quoting DolphinAir747 (Reply 54): Does Norwegian Cruise Lines have its head office in Norway? If so that could drive business traffic. |
Quoting Mortyman (Reply 58): No Norwegian Cruise Lines were bought up by a Malaysin company many years ago. It's only Norwegian in name |
Quoting Navigator (Reply 64): All traffic originationg from Stockholm through CPH has to be extracted from CPH figures |
Quoting Navigator (Reply 64): Prove me wrong? Now SAS had made a choice besed on market studies. Prove them wrong if you like |
Quoting Navigator (Reply 56): Most major companies are based in Stockholm and for instance the music industry is booming. |