Moderators: jsumali2, richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
Quoting MaverickM11 (Reply 4): I still don't think DL has any idea what it wants out of this situation. And I guarantee it won't get it. |
Quoting lightsaber (Reply 5): IAM is facing layoffs unless import export renews. They already had layoffs at Boeing satellite (IAM?). |
Quoting n7371f (Reply 7): Classic Richard. Picking fights. |
Quoting northwestEWR (Reply 8): Yeah.......... not. Richard isn't even mentioned in the article. I doubt he's wasting his time on petty union arguments. That doesn't sound like the Richard Anderson that I know. |
Quoting enilria (Reply 2): IMHO, it is best to not stir up things with a union over things that are not contract related, but we will see... |
Quoting n7371f (Reply 7): Classic Richard. Picking fights. |
Quoting enilria (Reply 6): IAM is going to support Boeing I think. Looking at their membership, it appears airlines are the minority. Is that correct? If so, why would they go against the bulk of their members? |
Quoting northwestEWR (Reply 8): Yeah.......... not. Richard isn't even mentioned in the article. |
Quoting IndianicWorld (Reply 13): I was shocked to see that AA are a buy on board operation on their domestic network for anything other than a drink. On a 4+ hour flight from LAX-ORD to get that kind of service is enough to make one laugh out loud at a "premium" carrier. |
Quoting alatar144 (Reply 14): While I don't necessarily disagree with you, we do have to admit that - as Australians - we probably have the highest standard regular domestic service of anywhere in the world. The increasingly premium nature of our two 'premium' carriers is reaching heights that, IMO, are slightly absurd and puts even some other airlines international service to shame. Our good fortune in this arena could definitely colour our view of what is 'premium' for the American market. |
Quoting IndianicWorld (Reply 13): |
Quoting thekorean (Reply 16): Americans don't really want premium on board free drinks and snacks for short haul flights if it meant extra cost. |
Quoting MaverickM11 (Reply 4): I still don't think DL has any idea what it wants out of this situation. And I guarantee it won't get it. |
Quoting lightsaber (Reply 5): IAM is facing layoffs unless import export renews. They already had layoffs at Boeing satellite (IAM?). |
Quoting thekorean (Reply 16): Americans don't really want premium on board free drinks and snacks for short haul flights if it meant extra cost. |
Quoting northwestEWR (Reply 8): Yeah.......... not. Richard isn't even mentioned in the article. |
Quoting northwestEWR (Reply 8): It just so happens they also represent airline mechanics (not at Delta). |
Quoting enilria (Reply 19): #1 They have and will again attempt to unionize DL. Why irritate th |
Quoting enilria (Thread starter): This seems more risky than most of their other efforts against the ME? Agree/Disagree? |
Quoting IndianicWorld (Reply 17): The fact is though that the prices are still usually far higher on the US3 than a ULCC flight, so they are paying more to fly them. They may well not want to pay the extra cost, but they are anyway and getting nothing of any value for it. |
Quoting mpdpilot (Reply 22): |
Quoting peanuts (Reply 24): This Delta "news" release is deliberate. Yes, the CEO approves of this message. Yes, Delta is still actively trying to put unions in a bad light wherever it can. Ideally, they don't want any of it around. If Delta can raise employee awareness of their IAM hate, and open up SkySpa's at select, pro-union heavy locations to leverage that stance, all the power to them. |
Quoting MSPNWA (Reply 26): This is just an anti-union hack piece. DL will do anything to sway employees against joining the IAM. |
Quoting mayor (Reply 27): DL doesn't have to do a damn thing to sway the employees against the IAM. The IAM is doing a pretty good job of shooting themselves in the foot. |
Quoting northwestEWR (Reply 8): Obviously the IAM is going to support further sales of aircraft to the ME3. That's jobs for them. It just so happens they also represent airline mechanics (not at Delta). |
Quoting northwestEWR (Reply 8): Yeah.......... not. Richard isn't even mentioned in the article. I doubt he's wasting his time on petty union arguments. That doesn't sound like the Richard Anderson that I know. |
Quoting enilria (Reply 19): #1 They have and will again attempt to unionize DL. Why irritate them? |
Quoting mayor (Reply 20): As I mentioned, they've already, more or less, failed with trying to unionize the flight attendants. They HAVE failed, once before, to unionize most of the other work groups.......think they can succeed this time, considering all the things the employees have received from the company, since then.....i.e. profit sharing, pay raises, improvements in benefits, etc.? |
Quoting Deltal1011man (Reply 29): Quoting enilria (Reply 19): #1 They have and will again attempt to unionize DL. Why irritate them? Trying to make the DL employees think the IAM (or insert union here) is against them would, in theory, make them vote to stay away from said union. |
Quoting lightsaber (Reply 5): IAM is facing layoffs unless import export renews. They already |
Quoting YTZ (Reply 23): In sum, the contention that US legacy carriers provide sub-par value for money holds true. Most remarkable in the North American context is that LCCs often provide a better hard product than the legacies (B6 for example). The only real value these days with North American (including AC in all this) legacies, are their FFPs. And those are being rapidly devalued too. |
Quoting billreid (Reply 18): Actually not true. Americans already pay for this on the flights they just don't get the product. Ryanair or Easyjet charge so much less for flights than WN its almost funny. Where in the USA can I get a flight for $9.99. Please let me know. |
Quoting northwestEWR (Reply 8): Yeah.......... not. Richard isn't even mentioned in the article. I doubt he's wasting his time on petty union arguments. That doesn't sound like the Richard Anderson that I know. |
Quoting Deltal1011man (Reply 29): Trying to make the DL employees think the IAM (or insert union here) is against them would, in theory, make them vote to stay away from said union. |
Quoting thekorean (Reply 16): Americans don't really want premium on board free drinks and snacks for short haul flights if it meant extra cost. |
Quoting enilria (Reply 6): They want a freeze and no more 5th freedom for EK (but theirs unaffected). |
Quoting MaverickM11 (Reply 36): Quoting enilria (Reply 6): They want a freeze and no more 5th freedom for EK (but theirs unaffected). Right but how do you craft a solution that applies to just the ME3 and not the other state backed carriers? China is a hot topic now; why not freeze Chinese carriers too? |