Moderators: jsumali2, richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
Quoting AA777223 (Thread starter): Eight hours without power |
Quoting LAXintl (Reply 1): Remember Guam started as a franchise operation for the Micronesian governments. The routes very much still serve this need to connect communities and bring in visitors from key p2p markets. The flying such as the secondary Japan markets are meant solely for local tourism and are standalone flights, not designed to flow people across the UA network to the mainland. |
Quoting AA777223 (Thread starter): owever, they make using the hub very difficult for US passengers, as it is only served through HNL. |
Quoting adamblang (Reply 10): I might be using DOT numbers incorrectly but 1/3 of traffic from Guam headed toward the 50 U.S. states (so excluding other Pacific U.S. territory traffic) is going to Hawai‘i. No need for mainland U.S. flights there. |
Quoting catiii (Reply 8): And NRT and PVG...last time I went I connected via NRT from ORD. |
Quoting catiii (Reply 8): And HKG, though that is longer. |
Quoting adamblang (Reply 10): I *think* if you have nonstop GUM-mainland service, you kill the business case for nonstop GUM-HNL service. |
Quoting AA777223 (Reply 13): I would just think this would be a route made for the 788, that might have some potential. I do enjoy the discussion, regardless |
Quoting TC957 (Reply 12): I have no idea if UA have contracts with the USAF to fly personnel in & out of GUM for the Anderson Air Base there, but should they have one I can see a direct US mainland service being viable, but otherwise not. I've been there twice, not many Brits get to go there, most Americans I spoke to were connected with the USAF in some form or another. As has been pointed out, GUM is a long way from LAX / SFO and Americans can get their dose of winter sun much nearer home. |
Quoting chrisp390 (Reply 17): I was just looking and flying to Jakarta from LAX is almost the same distance transiting through GUM as NRT. UA could then fly a much more economical and right sized 737 on Guam - Jakarta and be able to serve it. |
Quoting AA777223 (Thread starter): However, they make using the hub very difficult for US passengers, as it is only served through HNL. |
Quoting AA777223 (Thread starter): Add to that, all the flights to hawaii are served on UA's subfleet of 777s that are configured...less comfortably than their other overseas aircraft, to put it politely |
Quoting AA777223 (Thread starter): Eight hours without power or seatback entertainment or in a recliner J seat is brutal |
Quoting SonomaFlyer (Reply 5): My belief is that UA makes good money on their HNL to GUM run via the contracts previously mentioned along with air cargo. They also make good money on their island hopper route from HNL to GUM via the various islands they fly to along the way. |
Quoting adamblang (Reply 10): Given United fills a 344 seat 777-200 every day, call that 114 people staying in the Pacific region. That leaves 230 people going to the mainland. There isn't a plane small enough with enough range to have multiple flights to any variety of hubs so all the traffic must go to a single hub. That means a single 767-300 or 767-400 needs to go GUM-SFO. If you're in any market that isn't served by United at SFO, you still have to double connect so no real benefit there. |
Quoting adamblang (Reply 10): I might be using DOT numbers incorrectly but 1/3 of traffic from Guam headed toward the 50 U.S. states (so excluding other Pacific U.S. territory traffic) is going to Hawai‘i. No need for mainland U.S. flights there. |
Quoting Roseflyer (Reply 16): United is not going to make any money flying transit passengers from the lower 48 through Guam. For flights to Japan or other countries, it is far more cost effective to fly a Korean or Japanese airline. UA can't compete on cost. The purpose of the Guam hub is to cover the local demand from Guam and also the tourist demand for its beaches. |
Quoting chrisp390 (Reply 17): UA could then fly a much more economical and right sized 737 on Guam - Jakarta and be able to serve it. |
Quoting ua900 (Reply 19): You can get to GUM through other places as well, e.g. NRT, which is also a UA hub btw. |
Quoting ua900 (Reply 19): Could have sent a 788/9 between LAX / SFO and GUM, 219-252 seats. Problem is you can't *sell* the 36-48 seats up front and/or haul as much cargo, hence the Hawai'i 772s and the 737s from Asia. |
Quoting chrisp390 (Reply 17): UA could then fly a much more economical and right sized 737 on Guam - Jakarta and be able to serve it. |
Quoting AA777223 (Reply 18): Just booked that same flight myself. I pretty much noticed the same thing, haha. |
Quoting RDH3E (Reply 21): Much more efficient for UA to fly you to NRT and NH fly you the rest of the way which is the way it is now. It's a wonderful UA 789 LAX-NRT, then a great NH 788 NRT-CGK. You can't get a much better trip than that. |
Quoting ua900 (Reply 19): Add to that, Hawai'i 772s are nicer than the 738s they also run, to put it politely. UA doesn't even have int'l products on every int'l route, let alone domestically. For UA, even moving to an int'l 767 was a big deal in LIM, as was a flat bed 752 for BOG. |
Quoting AA777223 (Reply 13): These are not US United hubs, therefore obviating them from this discussion. |
Quoting AA777223 (Thread starter): they make using the hub very difficult for US passengers, as it is only served through HNL. |
Quoting AA777223 (Reply 22): The flights to HNL from anywhere except LAX and SFO are unquestionably the longest in the system without lie flat J. |
Quoting AA777223 (Thread starter): Eight hours without power or seatback entertainment or in a recliner J seat is brutal. |
Quoting N1120A (Reply 11): Quoting adamblang (Reply 10): I might be using DOT numbers incorrectly but 1/3 of traffic from Guam headed toward the 50 U.S. states (so excluding other Pacific U.S. territory traffic) is going to Hawai‘i. No need for mainland U.S. flights there. There has been various talk over the years that a non-stop to LAX would be forthcoming, because of the amount of traffic. |
Quoting gdg9 (Reply 7): I've been to Guam twice (2010-11), both times I saw mostly Japanese and Korean tourists. I understand more Chinese are coming now too. |
Quoting AA777223 (Reply 22): The 738s are run strictly from the west coast, and the onboard product is fairly similar, actually. |
Quoting AA777223 (Reply 22): The flights to HNL from anywhere except LAX and SFO are unquestionably the longest in the system without lie flat J. |
Quoting malaysia (Reply 27): I was in HNL once and saw a couple checking in for HNL-HKG via GUM on United. |
Quoting ua900 (Reply 28): Should have gone through NRT |
Quoting malaysia (Reply 33): I am not sure UA serves NRT-HKG anymore? |
Quoting copter808 (Reply 35): Quoting malaysia (Reply 33): I am not sure UA serves NRT-HKG anymore? Looks like they fly it 4 times weekly, M W F Sa. I thought they had terminated it too. |
Quoting Viscount724 (Reply 36): I can't find any UA flights NRT-HKG-NRT. Where are you looking? |
Quoting GavinSharp (Reply 37): Quoting Viscount724 (Reply 36): I can't find any UA flights NRT-HKG-NRT. Where are you looking? e.g. https://flightaware.com/live/flight/UAL7989 |
Quoting AA777223 (Thread starter): They also serve some very cool secondary Japanese locations that I would love to get to, without flying through NRT or KIX like Fukuoka, Sapporo and Sendai. |
Quoting AA777223 (Thread starter): I am puzzled by how UA uses their GUM hub... ...Please let me know your thoughts. |
Quoting LAXintl (Reply 1): The flying such as the secondary Japan markets are meant solely for local tourism and are standalone flights, not designed to flow people across the UA network to the mainland. |
Quoting N1120A (Reply 11): There has been various talk over the years that a non-stop to LAX would be forthcoming, because of the amount of traffic. |
Quoting FlyHossD (Reply 42): Guam, Saipan and the other Micronesian islands are primarily intended as markets for Japanese tourists. |
Quoting RetiredWeasel (Reply 45): Northwest tried a mini hub out of GUM in the mid 90s utilizing 727s. As you and others have said, mostly beach traffic to and from Japan (NGO,FUK,OKA) and SEL and TPE. A few seats on the OKA flights were contracted by the military as NW also ran a DC-10 from HNL to GUM. Some of the 727s were also utilized on SEL-MNL and SEL-TPE for a while and this was an entirely different market. They closed the base in 1996 but was a great gig for us pilots who were based and lived there. The management said they needed the 72s back on the mainland as air travel was picking up, but we pretty much knew that they couldn't compete with Air Mike who was well established there and had a bigger operation. |
Quoting TC957 (Reply 12): I have no idea if UA have contracts with the USAF to fly personnel in & out of GUM for the Anderson Air Base there |
Quoting chrisp390 (Reply 3): Very good question, I always thought the same. They could serve a huge number of secondary Chinese cities, Vietnam, Indonesia, Bangladesh, maybe Busan even too all from Guam on 737's. They could offer 1 stop flights from all their hubs in the U.S. To these destinations then via Guam. Then they wouldn't need to worry about Japanese currency issues they had complained about with the Narita hub too. |
Quoting adamblang (Reply 10): I *think* if you have nonstop GUM-mainland service, you kill the business case for nonstop GUM-HNL service. |
Quoting TC957 (Reply 12): I have no idea if UA have contracts with the USAF to fly personnel in & out of GUM for the Anderson Air Base there, |
Quoting TC957 (Reply 12): most Americans I spoke to were connected with the USAF in some form or another. |
Quoting Roseflyer (Reply 16): I don't think United carries many charter passengers, but many of those on leave fly UA through HNL. |
Quoting LAXintl (Reply 20): How many Indonesians are looking for a beach vacation in Guam? |
Quoting malaysia (Reply 27): I was in HNL once and saw a couple checking in for HNL-HKG via GUM on United. |
Quoting ua900 (Reply 28): Should have gone through NRT |
Quoting Viscount724 (Reply 31): Braniff June 1980 route map. All the Asian routes were gone a few months later, and of course Braniff itself was gone by 1982. |
Quoting Viscount724 (Reply 31): The only carrier that's ever operated nonstop from the U.S. mainland to GUM was Braniff and, like all their short-lived transpacific services, it was a failure. Many of the 747SP flights were almost empty. GUM was a stop to HKG. |
Quoting RWA380 (Reply 48): Of course, it's the only way you can get there from HNL on UA, unless you go via NRT then connect to NH. They may have been Hawaii residents & UA frequent flyers are all over the Islands, when I worked in HNL many of my regular corporate travelers were 1k's, only one guy was die hard DL, he would fly HNL-LAX-HKG just to fly DL & always paid F. Or they could have been on passes as employees of the airline or another carrier that has a reciprocal with UA, the potential reasons are various and many. |