Has Mitsubishi really delayed the NRJ/Spacejet? Unfortunately yes.
But the latest is certification within this fiscal year for the MR9, or by March 2021.https://finance.yahoo.com/amphtml/news/ ... 00105.html
So while Mitsubishi deserves negative comments fir their past performance, the outright dismissal seems misplaced.
The above link notes they are finally getting a new chief engineer. A great chief engineer can turn around a program. I'm not saying the deadline will be met, but it looks like Mitsubishi will make it to market.
After flying with customers for 18+ months, then I expect new MR9 orders.
Mitsubishi has stated they will still develop the M100. It us a question of when, not if.
Now I'm posting as a user, but the E-jet/MRJ debate on scope has become old. I am not aware of any discussion to change scope among those who could influence scope. As an engineer, I design to requirements. The requirements are:
1. 76 pax
2. At least 1400nm still air range with reserves. (My best guess after reading a bunch on this topic).
3. Enough cabin volume for domestic first class and some Y+.
4. Enough baggage volume for the winter peak season.
5. Under the 86,000 lb MTOW.
7. Lower fuel burn than E-175 or CR9.
8. Lower maintenance costs (mostly engine, but airframe also).
9. Quieter cabin (not much, engines are enough).
10. 99.6%+ dispatch reliability
IMHO, Mitsubishi will not get new firm orders until they prove the MR9 has met efficiency and dispatch reliability.
I believe this plane will happen.
Within its range, it has every chance of being the most efficient.
IM messages to mods on warnings and bans will be ignored and nasty ones will result in a ban.