Moderators: jsumali2, richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
Quoting WIederling (Reply 5): |
Quoting kelvin933 (Reply 3): Before there are any direct flights between Iran and the USA the countries need to establish diplomatic relations. |
Quoting MIflyer12 (Reply 7): That gets repeated on a.net but I'll point out that the U.S. and Cuba had direct flights (charters) long before the recent restoration of embassies and full diplomatic relations. |
Quoting kelvin933 (Reply 3): Before there are any direct flights between Iran and the USA the countries need to establish diplomatic relations. |
Quoting nicode (Reply 4): With the new VWP for Iran in the United States |
Quoting kelvin933 (Reply 8): All the charters that I can remember on USA-Cuba have been operated by US registered aircraft. Are you seriously suggesting that IR would be allowed to operate IKA-LAX charters ? |
Quoting LTU932 (Reply 10): with the lack of diplomatic relations, for an Iranian to get a US visa is nearly impossible anyway. |
Quoting JayBCNLON (Reply 14): I also do not see why Iran with sanctions now being lifted would have to be considered any more hostile than any other country. |
Quoting LTU932 (Reply 10): ligible passports? There's no way Iran gets into the VWP, not to mention that with the lack of diplomatic relations, for an Iranian to get a US visa is nearly impossible anyway. |
Quoting PlymSpotter (Reply 11): Is this not because the aircraft would be seized due to ongoing legal issues? |
Quoting JayBCNLON (Reply 14): he legal framework countries can choose to use is governed by ICAO |
Quoting LAXintl (Reply 15): If you want a good example of how things can be hard to overcome - look at Lebanon a nation with similar murky background where a recognized terrorist organization is part of defacto governance of the nation. |
Quoting thekorean (Reply 1): Has US ever had a direct from openly hostile country before? I guess SU to SVO. |
Quoting Viscount724 (Reply 18): but I think SU has operated continuously. |
Quoting LAXintl (Reply 15): |
Quoting chrisp390 (Reply 20): Also does anyone have any idea why Qatar is not on the list of states that sponsor terror? From what I have heard there was a lot of evidence suggesting they support terror organizations. |
Quoting LAXintl (Reply 15): And lastly the biggest hurdle -- Iran is a designated state sanctioned terrorism sponsor nation. |
Quoting usdcaguy (Reply 21): The US Central Command has its forward headquarters in Qatar. They can do a workaround in that case to avoid inconvenient labels, as they always do. |
Quoting ASA (Reply 13): They go to Turkey for their visa applications. Not easy by any means ... of course. |
Quoting chrisp390 (Reply 20): Also does anyone have any idea why Qatar is not on the list of states that sponsor terror? From what I have heard there was a lot of evidence suggesting they support terror organizations. |
Quoting MarcoPoloWorld (Reply 22): Really? |
Quoting AirIndia (Reply 24): Istanbul and Dubai are the 2 US consulates that offer visa services for Iranians. |
Quoting Directorguy (Reply 27): |
Quoting thekorean (Reply 1): Has US ever had a direct from openly hostile country before? I guess SU to SVO. |
Quoting ASA (Reply 13): Lots of Iranian students come to the US for graduate studies ... great students in my experience! They go to Turkey for their visa applications. Not easy by any means ... of course. |
Quoting LAXintl (Reply 15): Is not going to happen for a looooooong time. |
Quoting solarflyer22 (Reply 17): Yeah, there really is almost no way Iranians can enter the US and now with new rules in places VWP members who went to Iran after 2011 lost their visa free entrance into the USA. That kills of 50% off the potential pax right off the bat. |
Quoting LAXintl (Reply 15): Is not going to happen for a looooooong time. First Iran must earn IASA Category-I rating. Second Iran must allow US agencies such as FAA, TSA and DHS to snoop around their airports and government authorities to certify security compliance. |
Quoting solarflyer22 (Reply 17): It is hard. As soon as that plane lands in JFK, you can bet an Israeli American will demand to be flown to IKA with their Israeli passport much as they did to Kuwait Airways and that will torpedo the route. You may recall Kuwait abandoned the JFK to LON route for this exact reason. |
Quoting solarflyer22 (Reply 17): So why not sue to get a $200 million A380 to pay for "terrorism" supported by a state sponsor of terror? Same deal for Canada too. |
Quoting LAXintl (Reply 15): If you want a good example of how things can be hard to overcome - look at Lebanon a nation with similar murky background where a recognized terrorist organization is part of defacto governance of the nation. |
Quoting mercure1 (Reply 28): |
Quoting Directorguy (Reply 35): If and when Iran Air resumes flights to the US, it could be via a city in Europe, where passengers will be re-screened before they board the aircraft for the transatlantic leg. This is similar to what PK does. A 1-stop service to Europe could easily be operated by an A330 instead of going for a 777 or used A340 for a nonstop Iran-US flight. |
Quoting LAXintl (Reply 26): Air Koryo has a better chance at landing at LAX at the moment than does Iran Air. |
Quoting Directorguy (Reply 27): The process for getting a US visa for Iranians is terrible. Not only do applicants need to travel to Ankara or Dubai (both cater to Iranian residents and have Farsi speaking consular staff) |
Quoting WIederling (Reply 5): Quoting thekorean (Reply 1): openly hostile country more like hostile reciprocity. |
Quoting thekorean (Reply 6): Quoting WIederling (Reply 5): True, but American carriers aren't looking to start IKA. |
Quoting Directorguy (Reply 35): If and when Iran Air resumes flights to the US, it could be via a city in Europe, where passengers will be re-screened before they board the aircraft for the transatlantic leg. This is similar to what PK does. A 1-stop service to Europe could easily be operated by an A330 instead of going for a 777 or used A340 for a nonstop Iran-US flight. |
Quoting LAXintl (Reply 26): Iranians often take buses to Ankara. |
Quoting LAXintl (Reply 15): Second Iran must allow US agencies such as FAA, TSA and DHS to snoop around their airports and government authorities to certify security compliance. |
Quoting LAXintl (Reply 15): Is not going to happen for a looooooong time. |
Quoting sandyb123 (Reply 9): The best way to get Iran to be a diplomatic friend is to stop punishing them for the slightly dubious government and engage with them on all levels, including aviation. |
Quoting solarflyer22 (Reply 17): It is hard. As soon as that plane lands in JFK, you can bet an Israeli American will demand to be flown to IKA with their Israeli passport much as they did to Kuwait Airways and that will torpedo the route. You may recall Kuwait abandoned the JFK to LON route for this exact reason. |
Quoting nimool (Reply 32): That is true, however from what is being heard that if they get the A380 deal done, the delivery would be 2019 onwards, so there is a good 3 year ahead of all what you said to be certified or earned. |
Quoting LTU932 (Reply 30): Quoting thekorean (Reply 1): Has US ever had a direct from openly hostile country before? I guess SU to SVO. Think that this route existed since the Soviet Times. It was only after the fall of the USSR that an american company started flying to Russia (don't know what was before DL466/467 JFK-SVO-JFK). But check all the american and PROChinese companies flying to PVG, PEK between others. And the "charters" to Cuba. Did PanAm ever flew to Moscow? It would have been the Flight of the Spies, as it is today the SU104/105 SVO-IAD-SVO. |
Quoting aryonoco (Reply 41): This would require a massive change in attitude on the parts of the Iranians to happen. I do not see that on the cards for quite some time. |