Flighty
Topic Author
Posts: 9963
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2007 3:07 am

Best, Least-used Runways?

Fri Feb 05, 2016 5:42 am

The thread about ORF's new runway proposal got me thinking about some of the large runways that have been built that aren't really used (esp in the USA but we might as well go global here).

What are some big, expensive runways (civil...) that get very little use?
 
Beatyair
Posts: 856
Joined: Mon Feb 10, 2014 9:09 pm

RE: Best, Least-used Runways?

Fri Feb 05, 2016 5:50 am

I have no idea why Huntsville (I used to live there) has two parallel runways and one was just extended. Passenger service is minimal, Cargo is pretty good, and Delta practices touch and goes there, but you don't need two runways. Oddly enough, there master plan shows a third.

Feel sorry for airports that have over built and then are de-hubbed.
 
mark2fly1034
Posts: 251
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 11:38 pm

RE: Best, Least-used Runways?

Fri Feb 05, 2016 5:52 am

Daytona DAB has a 10,500 foot runway no plane that files there requires that much runway.
 
steex
Posts: 1428
Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2007 8:45 am

RE: Best, Least-used Runways?

Fri Feb 05, 2016 5:52 am

We may need to differentiate between runways that get very little use and those that are unnecessary, but see a reasonable share of use just because they are there. The notorious 11/29 at STL was all but unneeded before it was completed, but given that it might as well be used, it sees a decent amount of movements from Concourse A carriers.

Sticking with STL, the existence of three parallels has made 6/24 virtually unneeded except in the worst of wind conditions.
 
BMcD
Posts: 70
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2014 4:11 pm

RE: Best, Least-used Runways?

Fri Feb 05, 2016 6:04 am

Daytona has seen Air Force One fly in there.

Colorado Springs has long runways as well, although we do see AF1 on occasion and some IFE for military aircraft. When the weather is bad, we do see some DEN diversions, but mostly small aircraft.
DC-8, DC-9, DC-10, MD-11, MD-80/2/3, 717, 737, 747, 757, 767, 777, 787, L1011, CRJ2/7/900, A320, A321, A330, Saab 340
 
User avatar
winterlight
Posts: 1432
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2014 8:57 am

RE: Best, Least-used Runways?

Fri Feb 05, 2016 7:42 am

Manston is no longer used thanks to our idiotic UK government.
Question everything. Trust no-one.
 
flyiguy
Posts: 983
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2004 2:21 pm

RE: Best, Least-used Runways?

Fri Feb 05, 2016 7:46 am

How about the 3rd parallel runway at IAD that was completed 7 years ago and is rarely used except for maybe 1 hour a day when the int'l flights arrive from over the pond.

FLY
The opinions I post are of mine and mine alone, not of the airline I work for.
 
User avatar
csturdiv
Posts: 1966
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 10:33 am

RE: Best, Least-used Runways?

Fri Feb 05, 2016 7:49 am

BLV and GYY could be in the running for least used runways. And if people get their way in Illinois, you can add Peotone to that list.
An American expat from the ORD area living and working in SYD
 
B757capt
Posts: 1394
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2004 7:11 am

RE: Best, Least-used Runways?

Fri Feb 05, 2016 7:59 am

SLN Salina KS, 10,000 ft runway in the middle of nowhere!
The views written by this user are in no manner the views of my employer and should not be thought as such.
 
mmo
Posts: 1811
Joined: Thu Apr 18, 2013 3:04 pm

RE: Best, Least-used Runways?

Fri Feb 05, 2016 9:37 am

Quoting B757capt (Reply 8):
SLN Salina KS, 10,000 ft runway in the middle of nowhere

Former military base, was originally Smoky Hill that was used for training B-29 crews. Post war it was Schilling AFB which had B-47s and KC-97s assigned. The base was closed in 1965.
If we weren't all crazy we'd all go insane!
 
User avatar
GCT64
Posts: 1753
Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2007 6:34 pm

RE: Best, Least-used Runways?

Fri Feb 05, 2016 10:31 am

Difficult to beat Ciudad Real Central LERL / CQM when discussing a topic like this (although that's a whole airport not just a pointless runway).
Flown in: A20N,A21N,A30B,A306,A310,A319,A320,A321,A332,A333,A343,A346,A359,A388,BA11,BU31,(..56 more types..),VC10,WESX
 
DiscoverCSG
Posts: 597
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 2:22 am

RE: Best, Least-used Runways?

Fri Feb 05, 2016 1:34 pm

Quoting flyiguy (Reply 6):

How about the 3rd parallel runway at IAD that was completed 7 years ago and is rarely used except for maybe 1 hour a day when the int'l flights arrive from over the pond.

IAD's UA hub is heavily banked. For over half the day, IAD could happily function as a one-runway airport. But for a few peak bank times, the second and third runways (and the crosswind runway) get used pretty well.
 
User avatar
RRTrent
Posts: 460
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2015 8:12 am

RE: Best, Least-used Runways?

Fri Feb 05, 2016 2:02 pm

11/29 at DUB.... Its only 4300ft long, not parallel to 10/28, and I've never in my life seen it used.

The irony of it all being that DUB will soon need a parallel runway
 
PITrules
Posts: 2109
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2000 11:27 am

RE: Best, Least-used Runways?

Fri Feb 05, 2016 2:04 pm

Quoting Beatyair (Reply 1):
Oddly enough, there master plan shows a third.

Actually it allows up to 5:
http://www.huntsvillempo.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/multimodal.pdf
FLYi
 
kbmiflyer
Posts: 264
Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2004 11:47 pm

RE: Best, Least-used Runways?

Fri Feb 05, 2016 2:07 pm

BLV (Belleville, IL) was the one that came to mind for me, what an incredible waste of money.

Several airport have parallel runways that get used, but aren't really needed (many already mentioned here, like HSV and STL). There are several airports out there that needed the runways at some point, but not anymore - CVG 36L fits that bill.

There are also a few large airports that have crosswinds that rarely get used. 4L a ORD, 31R at DFW.
 
roseflyer
Posts: 9602
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2004 9:34 am

RE: Best, Least-used Runways?

Fri Feb 05, 2016 2:09 pm

The most expensive and least used runway that I can think of is STL. In 1998, STL spent 1.1 Billion on a new runway and bulldozed communities to do it. That is right about the same time that TWA was in a tail spin and declining when STL went from a major hub and 8th busiest airport in the country to a small spoke in the network. The runway now is barely ever used and there have been talks of closing it down and selling off the land.
If you have never designed an airplane part before, let the real designers do the work!
 
badgervor
Posts: 139
Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2014 10:58 pm

RE: Best, Least-used Runways?

Fri Feb 05, 2016 2:18 pm

MKE has runway 31/13 at 5535ft. It is used in only extreme northwest or southeast winds.But even under those rare conditions I've only seen it used a couple of times. Oh and there was that one time a learjet slid off the runway right at the intersection of 19R/25L forcing everyone to use that runway. I remember seeing a NW 727 take off that day using every bit of the runway.
 
User avatar
Cyow
Posts: 174
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2015 2:41 pm

RE: Best, Least-used Runways?

Fri Feb 05, 2016 2:47 pm

I would have to nominate TNT (Dade-Collier Training and Transition Airport). Besides having perhaps the best airport code on the planet, it has a 10,499 ft runway in the middle of the Florida Everglades.

Via Wikipedia: "Begun in 1968 as the Everglades Jetport, the airport was planned to be the largest airport in the world, with six runways and a new "transportation corridor" connecting it to central Miami. At the time, the Boeing 2707 was under development and it was anticipated that supersonic aircraft would dominate long-haul air transportation. Because of environmental concerns and the cancellation of the 2707 program, construction was halted in 1970 after the completion of just one 10,500' runway.

The unfinished airport was maintained primarily for the purpose of training airline pilots, particularly for Pan American World Airways and Eastern Airlines which were based at nearby Miami International Airport. The long runway at Dade-Collier could accommodate aircraft as large as Boeing 747s, and was equipped with a state-of-the-art instrument landing system. The isolation of the airport meant that it could be used for training flights at all hours of the day and night. In more recent years, the advent of flight simulators has made such training flights less economical, and the airport is now used much less frequently, although it remains open to general aviation."

Most recently the South Florida media has reported that Dade county aviation director Emilio Gonzalez said that his department is now studying a plan to convert the 23,840-acre facility into a cargo airport, as cargo and passenger volume continues to climb at MIA. see http://www.thenextmiami.com/dade-jet...could-be-opened-for-cargo-flights/
"Broadsword calling Danny Boy"
 
r2rho
Posts: 3096
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 10:13 pm

RE: Best, Least-used Runways?

Fri Feb 05, 2016 3:16 pm

What's with the hate for STL? The runway sees regular use, and is particularly useful in bad weather, when airport capacity used to plummete in the old configuration. Yes, it would see more use if TW were still around, but it is not lying abandoned; there are many more runways around the country that would rank well ahead, yet do not get the publicity STL gets on this site.
 
User avatar
BN727227Ultra
Posts: 633
Joined: Fri Jan 10, 2014 7:15 pm

RE: Best, Least-used Runways?

Fri Feb 05, 2016 3:38 pm

OMA, three runways, two parallel and one offset 4 degrees. They really only need one...but I can understand maint. But three?
 
badgervor
Posts: 139
Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2014 10:58 pm

RE: Best, Least-used Runways?

Fri Feb 05, 2016 3:45 pm

I just remembered the least used runway of all...Meigs Field  sarcastic 

[Edited 2016-02-05 07:46:31]
 
User avatar
UltimateDelta
Posts: 2227
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 7:56 am

RE: Best, Least-used Runways?

Fri Feb 05, 2016 3:50 pm

Quoting BN727227Ultra (Reply 19):

OMA, three runways, two parallel and one offset 4 degrees. They really only need one...but I can understand maint. But three?

Well, 14L/32R is almost exclusively used by GA and biz jets on the east side, which constitutes a fair amount of traffic at OMA. The other two both see regular use, so it's not like there are any just sitting there waiting for the right conditions before they can be used. Granted, none really functions as a crosswind runway since the headings aren't that far off, but that's more a function of the shape of the land on which it's built.
Midwest Airlines- 1984-2010
 
User avatar
CaptSkibi
Posts: 120
Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 7:15 am

RE: Best, Least-used Runways?

Fri Feb 05, 2016 4:24 pm

RWY 9L/27R (8708 ft x 150 ft) at DTW KDTW is almost exclusively used as a taxiway. It typically has lighted X's at each end of the runway signifying that it is closed.
Private Pilot, Airplane Single Engine Land / former frequent flyer with 9 straight years being elite on NW/DL
 
divemaster08
Posts: 185
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 1:45 pm

RE: Best, Least-used Runways?

Fri Feb 05, 2016 4:45 pm

Why not the old Space Shuttle Runway in Cape Canaveral? Obviously a very good runway that was needed during its time but now is probably not used except for an odd Nasa flight?
My dream, is to fly, over the rainbow, so high!
 
Trucker
Posts: 63
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 4:17 pm

RE: Best, Least-used Runways?

Fri Feb 05, 2016 4:50 pm

Speaking of St. Louis, how about BLV?
 
steex
Posts: 1428
Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2007 8:45 am

RE: Best, Least-used Runways?

Fri Feb 05, 2016 4:52 pm

Quoting r2rho (Reply 18):
What's with the hate for STL? The runway sees regular use, and is particularly useful in bad weather, when airport capacity used to plummete in the old configuration. Yes, it would see more use if TW were still around, but it is not lying abandoned; there are many more runways around the country that would rank well ahead, yet do not get the publicity STL gets on this site.

No "hate" from me, just discussion - it came to mind for me because it was my home airport for nearly 15 years.

I agree it does see regular use, but the airport would really be no worse off if it didn't. It is very clear that runway was badly needed when the idea was conceived and construction began, but STL is oft discussed because the timing turned out to be awful and it was unneeded almost very quickly once construction was complete. No ill will toward the airport or the City for the decisions that were made.
 
Airnerd
Posts: 299
Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2007 11:57 pm

RE: Best, Least-used Runways?

Fri Feb 05, 2016 4:59 pm

Mirabel!

Two 12,000 footers. No passengers. A little cargo. Some manufacturing.

Room to build 4 more runways...
 
User avatar
VS4ever
Posts: 2284
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 10:03 am

RE: Best, Least-used Runways?

Fri Feb 05, 2016 5:02 pm

Got to throw 14/32 at BOS into the mix for this conversation, built because there was supposedly a need, way too short at 5,000 ft, and then had a hotel built at one end of it, long story behind that one.

Now used primarily as a parking spot for delayed flights and when ops require de-icing.

The last I read it had been very rarely used as it can only work in very limited conditions and only for water direction takeoffs and landings.

Nice wide taxiway though...

Actually thinking about it, we should add 15L/33R to the mix, the only time this is really used is as a hold position for flights taxiing to/from the 4/22's.

[Edited 2016-02-05 09:10:38]
That feeling when you sit at the end of a runway, brakes are released and the raw power takes over. Now that is a thing of beauty and it never gets old.
 
User avatar
BN727227Ultra
Posts: 633
Joined: Fri Jan 10, 2014 7:15 pm

RE: Best, Least-used Runways?

Fri Feb 05, 2016 5:04 pm

Quoting UltimateDelta (Reply 21):


]Well, 14L/32R is almost exclusively used by GA and biz jets on the east side, which constitutes a fair amount of traffic at OMA. The other two both see regular use, so it's not like there are any just sitting there waiting for the right conditions before they can be used. Granted, none really functions as a crosswind runway since the headings aren't that far off, but that's more a function of the shape of the land on which it's built

Forgot about GA and Part 135. it's so quiet over there!  
 
a380787
Posts: 4573
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 4:38 pm

RE: Best, Least-used Runways?

Fri Feb 05, 2016 5:09 pm

The short 11/29 at EWR gets surprisingly low usage. Most take-offs occur at the longest 4L/22R and the most landings at the slightly shorter 4R/22L.

For JFK, I read somewhere that due to the congest ATC allocation, usually only 2 runways are in use instead of all 4, seriously dampening its potential.
 
User avatar
HALtheAI
Posts: 294
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2015 8:30 pm

RE: Best, Least-used Runways?

Fri Feb 05, 2016 5:21 pm

VS4ever's post got me thinking; are there any runways that are used almost exclusively for taxiing instead of take-offs/landings?
 
seat1a
Posts: 489
Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2010 7:52 pm

RE: Best, Least-used Runways?

Fri Feb 05, 2016 5:29 pm

DTW 27R for East-West ops. I believe 27L is the newer runway.
 
washingtonflyer
Posts: 1511
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2013 9:45 pm

RE: Best, Least-used Runways?

Fri Feb 05, 2016 5:37 pm

Quoting a380787 (Reply 29):
The short 11/29 at EWR gets surprisingly low usage. Most take-offs occur at the longest 4L/22R and the most landings at the slightly shorter 4R/22L.

They could learn a thing or two from the cross runway (17/35) at PHL - lots of turbos and RJs on that one.

Speaking of head scratcher.... how about Rwy 8/26 at PHL. I've never seen a plane land on it....
 
Bambel
Posts: 128
Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2015 8:38 pm

RE: Best, Least-used Runways?

Fri Feb 05, 2016 5:39 pm

IPC (Easter Island) has an 10.885 ft runway because it was prepared to be an abort site for the Space Shuttle. Today it sees only a few flights a week.

And i'm surprised that no one so far mentioned BER   

b.
 
User avatar
Quantos
Posts: 304
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2013 9:29 pm

RE: Best, Least-used Runways?

Fri Feb 05, 2016 5:43 pm

I'm not sure how technically good they are, but the usual suspect from Canada, CYMX, has two 12,000 ft runways that see no passenger service nowadays. There are a number of cargo, general aviation, and testing/maintenance flights at the airport, though.
Quantos,

I maintain the Airbus A220 (formerly Bombardier C Series) Aircraft Status sheet: https://goo.gl/HZshto
Feel free to comment on the sheet with any improvement suggestions and data update requests! Thanks to Paolo92 for his advice!
 
User avatar
N776AU
Posts: 981
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 7:18 am

RE: Best, Least-used Runways?

Fri Feb 05, 2016 5:54 pm

Quoting BMcD (Reply 4):
Colorado Springs has long runways as well,

I would think altitude also plays in to that doesn't it?

Quoting roseflyer (Reply 15):
The most expensive and least used runway that I can think of is STL. In 1998, STL spent 1.1 Billion on a new runway and bulldozed communities to do it. That is right about the same time that TWA was in a tail spin and declining when STL went from a major hub and 8th busiest airport in the country to a small spoke in the network. The runway now is barely ever used and there have been talks of closing it down and selling off the land.

I actually took off from that runway and remember told what a rarity it was. Admittedly this was 8 years ago but I don't think traffic has really picked up at STL has it?
Careful, doors are closing, and will not reopen. Please wait for the next train.
 
727LOVER
Posts: 8447
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2001 12:22 am

RE: Best, Least-used Runways?

Fri Feb 05, 2016 5:55 pm

Quoting a380787 (Reply 29):
For JFK, I read somewhere that due to the congest ATC allocation, usually only 2 runways are in use instead of all 4, seriously dampening its potential.

How would they b able to use 4 at once? That is a LOT of widebody runway crossing.

Now 3, I could see 4-22s plus takeoffs on 31L beyond the intersection of 4L-22R
"We must accept finite disappointment, but never lose infinite hope." - Martin Luther King, Jr.
 
p201055r
Posts: 50
Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2011 9:37 pm

RE: Best, Least-used Runways?

Fri Feb 05, 2016 5:57 pm

Quoting RRTrent (Reply 12):
Quoting RRTrent (Reply 12):

I certainly recall EIDW's 30/12 being in use before it was re-designated 29/11, though usually to facilitate Regional/Commutter type flights and general aviation needs. The 29 or 30 approach was, if I'm not mistaken, based on a visual to 28 (or 35, when the old 24 was the principal runway), with a break off at about three miles. I can't recall many landings on 12, 30 seems to have been favoured for some reason.
I may have notched up a landing on that strip as a pax in a Saab 340, but I'd have to check. I have some recollection of an ATR42 using it for a departure to Sligo, too, so that probably isn't more than 10 years back and the designator would probably have been 29.
Can't recall when the runway designator changed, or when it ceased to be usable, but the three big X marks (visible on most satellite views from the regular suppliers of such) have been there quite a few years now and indicate it can't be used any longer.
When/if the political/planning/financial masters give the "nod" for a 28R/10L one might expect some of the "soil" of 2911 to be upgraded and returned to service.
 
User avatar
Revelation
Posts: 21739
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 9:37 pm

RE: Best, Least-used Runways?

Fri Feb 05, 2016 6:02 pm

Quoting mmo (Reply 9):
Former military base

SWF and PSM come to mind as big honking ex-SAC/TAC runways near big cities (NYC, BOS) with not much use.
Wake up to find out that you are the eyes of the world
The heart has its beaches, its homeland and thoughts of its own
Wake now, discover that you are the song that the morning brings
The heart has its seasons, its evenings and songs of its own
 
User avatar
speedbird707
Posts: 39
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2015 6:20 pm

RE: Best, Least-used Runways?

Fri Feb 05, 2016 6:03 pm

[quote=cyow,reply=17]Most recently the South Florida media has reported that Dade county aviation director Emilio Gonzalez said that his department is now studying a plan to convert the 23,840-acre facility into a cargo airport, as cargo and passenger volume continues to climb at MIA. see http://www.thenextmiami.com/dade-jet...could-be-opened-for-cargo-flights/

I had also heard a year or so ago that the environmentalist movement were giving birth to full size cows over the thought of an active airport there. They used the standard what "if" questions etc. It will be a hard slog to do it...I was out there two years ago and tried to get in to have a look around but security appeared rather quickly.
 
atwinstructor
Posts: 21
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 8:02 pm

RE: Best, Least-used Runways?

Fri Feb 05, 2016 6:11 pm

Quoting washingtonflyer (Reply 32):
Speaking of head scratcher.... how about Rwy 8/26 at PHL. I've never seen a plane land on it....

8 is used mainly only for takeoffs due to the approach path coming directly over the terminal. 26 is used for landings on a fairly regular basis as well, i've done both in a CRJ on multiple occasions.
 
vw
Posts: 224
Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2000 8:39 am

RE: Best, Least-used Runways?

Fri Feb 05, 2016 6:11 pm

With regard to 8/26 at PHL it doesn't see nearly the volume of 18/36 but is used regularly by the CRJ200,Dash-8, and General Aviation. I was a co-pilot for Air Wisconsin, when PHL is departing off the 9's we would run the performance for an 8 departure. Flights to the Northeast all were able to use 8 for departure, also if light 26 was available to land on. With the location of the terminals, 26 takeoffs, or 08 landings, are not an option.
 
User avatar
Moose135
Posts: 3073
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 11:27 pm

RE: Best, Least-used Runways?

Fri Feb 05, 2016 6:15 pm

Quoting Beatyair (Reply 1):
I have no idea why Huntsville (I used to live there) has two parallel runways and one was just extended. Passenger service is minimal, Cargo is pretty good, and Delta practices touch and goes there, but you don't need two runways.

Huntsville saw significant airline traffic in the 1960s and 70s during the height of the space age, which is probably why it originally had the two runways.
KC-135 - Passing gas and taking names!
 
a380787
Posts: 4573
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 4:38 pm

RE: Best, Least-used Runways?

Fri Feb 05, 2016 6:43 pm

Quoting 727LOVER (Reply 36):

How would they b able to use 4 at once? That is a LOT of widebody runway crossing.

Now 3, I could see 4-22s plus takeoffs on 31L beyond the intersection of 4L-22R

Look at the SFO model for guidance. During non-fog regular ops, the longer runways are used for landing, with approach coming in from south bay, landing in pairs. The shorter cross-section pair is used for domestic departures, usually heading out to the bay towards Oakland.

Most long-haul widebody departures also use the longer runways, departing northwest towards SSF/DalyCity.

SFO distributes the departures and arrivals well across all 4 runways. I don't really recall any one of them being neglected.
 
User avatar
UltimateDelta
Posts: 2227
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 7:56 am

RE: Best, Least-used Runways?

Fri Feb 05, 2016 6:50 pm

Quoting BN727227Ultra (Reply 28):
it's so quiet over there!

Go check it out the last weekend in April/first weekend in May!  

Simply out of curiosity, what's up with runway 17/35 in SLC? I've certainly seen it used, but not very much compared to the 16/34s.
Midwest Airlines- 1984-2010
 
Gazdon121
Posts: 531
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2015 6:09 pm

RE: Best, Least-used Runways?

Fri Feb 05, 2016 6:55 pm

Campbeltown airport here in the UK is massively underused has a very long runway, I believe concord used it for training many many years ago
 
MUWarriors
Posts: 196
Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 12:11 pm

RE: Best, Least-used Runways?

Fri Feb 05, 2016 7:01 pm

Quoting badgervor (Reply 16):

That one gets used if the 19R/1L and 7R/25L intersection is under construction. I've landed on that one on a number of occasions, think I only took off on it once. It seems to have a fair number of landings in the early morning.
 
zkncj
Posts: 3296
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 4:57 pm

RE: Best, Least-used Runways?

Fri Feb 05, 2016 7:01 pm

IUE (Niue) has an 2335m runway that is only used twice an by an NZ A320 doing an AKL-IUE-AKL service.

Other than that Niue is cut of from the world, for the rest of the week.
 
User avatar
PatrickZ80
Posts: 3943
Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2010 5:33 am

RE: Best, Least-used Runways?

Fri Feb 05, 2016 7:11 pm

I remember when MST still had runway 07/25. It was short and hardly ever used, even GA traffic mostly used the longer runway 03/21. It was later removed to make room for a new cargo terminal.

A similar situation exists at GRQ, altough over there runway 01/19 still exists. However, I've never seen an aircraft land or take off from there. They all seem to use 05/23.

[Edited 2016-02-05 11:15:09]
 
User avatar
VS4ever
Posts: 2284
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 10:03 am

RE: Best, Least-used Runways?

Fri Feb 05, 2016 7:15 pm

Quoting HALtheAI (Reply 30):
VS4ever's post got me thinking; are there any runways that are used almost exclusively for taxiing instead of take-offs/landings?

LGW North Runway 8L/26R is probably the prime example, as it's too close to 8R/26L to be used at the same time, it is pretty much exclusively used as a taxiway unless maintenance etc.
That feeling when you sit at the end of a runway, brakes are released and the raw power takes over. Now that is a thing of beauty and it never gets old.

Popular Searches On Airliners.net

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos