Moderators: jsumali2, richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
Quoting LAXintl (Thread starter): Seems Amazon really wants to take ever greater control of its logistics chain. |
Quoting atypical (Reply 2): Seems a bit strange. Hann very much occupied with several cargo operators, large maintenance hanger, and Ryanair. This would be a sale geared more for an airport operator rather a user. I can't see what Amazon gets from buying the airport over leasing except a lot extra work attempting to service current users. |
Quoting LAXintl (Thread starter): Interesting if true. Seems Amazon really wants to take ever greater control of its logistics chain. |
Quoting Okie (Reply 5): Interesting in the realm of why would you want to buy the whole airport for freight operations. Must be bargain basement pricing. |
Quoting blueflyer (Reply 6): To use profit from tenant rents to pay for Amazon's logistics operations? If the airport losses are lower than the anticipated costs of their operations, why pay rent to the airport when you can buy the airport? Obviously, it's a very simplified explanation that doesn't include a ton of other factors such as cost of capital. The point is, it may not be as far fetched an idea as it seems. |
Quoting Okie (Reply 5): Must be bargain basement pricing. |
Quoting atcsundevil (Reply 8): I suspect it's partially competitive pricing, coupled with a great opportunity to expand their business model at a facility with existing infrastructure located very centrally in Europe. Hahn in a lot of ways would be "plug and play" with infrastructure, aided by it being located reasonably close to a large financial hub |
Quoting SCQ83 (Reply 10): HHN is also about 100 km. from Luxembourg, Amazon's HQ in Europe. |
Quoting atcsundevil (Reply 12): That's right! I wasn't even thinking about that, but that's some more logic behind the move. I recall the Saarbrücken airport also being in somewhat dire financial straits of late (which is obviously closer to Luxembourg), but I'm sure that HHN has more/better opportunities in location and infrastructure. |
Quoting Whisperjet (Reply 14): The distribution centers that rely on cheap work force are certainly not in Luxemburg where the labour costs are extraordinarily high. |
Quoting spacecookie (Reply 16): The hq is quite useless, they are in Luxembourg because of the taxes... |
Quoting atcsundevil (Reply 12): That's right! I wasn't even thinking about that, but that's some more logic behind the move. I recall the Saarbrücken airport also being in somewhat dire financial straits of late (which is obviously closer to Luxembourg), but I'm sure that HHN has more/better opportunities in location and infrastructure. Either way, it opens up some exciting possibilities for their future. It's amazing to think that what's largely perceived as "just an online retailer" is potentially capable of growing their own international logistical network. |
Quoting SCQ83 (Reply 17): ??? Amazon Europe is HQed in Luxembourg, and that is where their European corporate structure is based. If you go to https://www.amazon.jobs there are 370 open positions for Amazon Luxembourg. So I wouldn't call it "useless". |
Quoting SCQ83 (Reply 10): wonder how Ryanair and Amazon will get along. |
Quoting Whisperjet (Reply 14): What makes Hahn valuable to amazon is the fact that it is one of the very few airports without night curfew in Germany. |
Quoting flyby519 (Reply 1): You sure they only want to control their own logistic chain? Look out FedEx and UPS! |
Quoting lightsaber (Reply 23): Quoting SCQ83 (Reply 10): wonder how Ryanair and Amazon will get along. FR will learn there is a tougher negotiator. |
Quoting lightsaber (Reply 23): Could a 2nd runway be built? |
Quoting thekorean (Reply 24): Any chance passenger rail service can use that? |
Quoting atypical (Reply 29): From my observations Germany's railroads are mostly, if not completely, electric. I think the only time I saw a diesel was in a switch yard. |
Quoting atypical (Reply 29): Good question. From my observations Germany's railroads are mostly, if not completely, electric. I think the only time I saw a diesel was in a switch yard. Even how the railraods are ulilized are are a mystery to me. I think comparing the North American and the European rail systems is no more valid than comparing the North American rail system and North American highway system. I hope someone who understands European railroads can shed some light here. |
Quoting SCQ83 (Reply 17): |
Quoting SCQ83 (Reply 10): HHN is also about 100 km. from Luxembourg, Amazon's HQ in Europe. |
Quoting atypical (Reply 21): What is the distribution of Amazon warehouses in relation to this airport. |
Quoting readytotaxi (Reply 22): Good, now every int airport should have a rail freight depot to get the stuff off the roads. |
Quoting PanHAM (Reply 33): But they would hjave to share the place with other tennants. The Airport loses in the Region of 18 Million € p.a.which they would have to absorb and reduce. |
Quoting PanHAM (Reply 33): Rail Connections are sometimes OK for passenger Airports but not for cargo. Rail Feeder for air freight might work for northern Italy to FRA, for HHN trucking is the only realistic way. 3 Mio Pax pp.a. who come from all directions do not justify a Train service either |
Quoting spacecookie (Reply 32): It is useless, you can read a lot about it http://www.dailymail.co.uk/money/new...-2624400/Amazons-0-1-tax-bill.html No one is working In the hq of Luxembourg. They will buy an airport (if they do finally) with the tax they don't pay in Europe .... Nice. |
Quoting PanHAM (Reply 33): The HQ cxould be on the Bahamas as well, ooos, sorry, not that popular anymore. But a LUX HQ serves the same purpose. |
Quoting B777LRF (Reply 25): This is not for final destination deliveries, it's to balance stock between warehouses. Deliveries to final destination require quite a bit more than a fleet of freighters and an airport to call home. |