|Quoting alfa164 (Reply 89):|
The information given by the Seattle Pride spokesman indicates - as other posters have mentioned - that the contract had typical, commonly-accepted sponsorship provisions. That is not an assumption; it is based on the evidence given. There is a difference.
This is the same spokesman that has, admittedly, "misinterpreted contractual language" and now resigned. Your statement was as confident as mine was, and you had no more concrete information than I did except that I WAS confident that DL and AS had peacefully co-existed in past events, despite Alaska's sponsorship. That was MY first hand experience. Your information was based on fabrications by someone that was trying to save their ass. Seems to me that you're information isn't quite as solid as mine.
[Edited 2016-05-19 14:55:37]