Moderators: richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
33lspotter wrote:IIRC EWR doesn't charge for the trip to the train station unlike JFK
BlatantEcho wrote:I tried it last month (Alaska started pdx-ewr, so gave it a go).....
It was he worst airport to city experience I've had in North America.
Never ever using EWR for any reason to manhattan.
Dreadful as everyone else clearly understands.
ty97 wrote:33lspotter wrote:IIRC EWR doesn't charge for the trip to the train station unlike JFK
They do, it's just bundled into your NJ Transit ticket as opposed to being a separate fee. $5.50 fee.
https://www.panynj.gov/airports/ewr-cost-tickets.html
33lspotter wrote:ty97 wrote:33lspotter wrote:IIRC EWR doesn't charge for the trip to the train station unlike JFK
They do, it's just bundled into your NJ Transit ticket as opposed to being a separate fee. $5.50 fee.
https://www.panynj.gov/airports/ewr-cost-tickets.html
Ah. Even so, from a convenience perspective, I would prefer to buy one ticket as you can in Newark as opposed to buying two separate tickets.
keitherson wrote:No one in the thread has even taken into account the state of EWR's airport facilities, either, which is disastrous! Why on Earth should I fly from EWR, when I can fly from JFK with access to the flagship Delta Sky Club, the AA Flagship Lounge, or a host of other international carriers and their lounges as a frequent flyer elite?
There is a reason why airlines are not in line to move to EWR and that JFK airport slots are the most coveted. There is a reason why all premium transcontinental service with AA, DL, and B6 is from JFK and not EWR, outside of UA's own hub. Even CX flies JFK-YVR.
Curiousflyer wrote:Both suck. Public transportation or private drive. If you are lucky it will be somewhat smooth but usually it will not be great and it would take billions and a lot of NIMBY fights to implement direct train lines.
Better places: Frankfurt, Amsterdam, Stockholm, Hong Kong. And of course Singapore if one drives.