KlimaBXsst
Topic Author
Posts: 249
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2019 4:14 pm

6 abreast A220 seating - Channel Airways style

Wed Jun 05, 2019 3:44 pm

Putting 6 across in an A220...

Does anyone have any opinions pro or con for a 6 abreast family seating configuration, similar to the Channel Airways style Trident.

I envision a narrow middle seat in each 3 seat unit at the back of the cabin aft of the overwing exits for kids under 10 and under 60 pounds or so. Thoughts?
Aesthetically the A 340 got it right!
 
User avatar
tistpaa727
Posts: 160
Joined: Sat May 05, 2007 5:23 am

Re: 6 abreast A220 seating - Channel Airways style

Wed Jun 05, 2019 3:46 pm

Is someone taking about this (link?)? Or are you just theorizing?

Personally this would be horrible in my view and would go against all of the positive feedback we hear airlines say passengers are providing.
Don't sweat the little things.
 
KlimaBXsst
Topic Author
Posts: 249
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2019 4:14 pm

Re: 6 abreast A220 seating - Channel Airways style

Wed Jun 05, 2019 3:57 pm

tistpaa727 wrote:
Is someone taking about this (link?)? Or are you just theorizing?

Personally this would be horrible in my view and would go against all of the positive feedback we hear airlines say passengers are providing.


Not that I am aware of yet? I am sure it is just a matter of time though, in free market capitalist open enterprise deregulated airline systems as in the US.

The A220 might make a great airplane for Southwest to compete with the likes of Allegiant, Frontier, and Spirit in the configuration I describe.

Here is a link to the Channel Airways 7 abreast Trident by the way.
Aesthetically the A 340 got it right!
 
KlimaBXsst
Topic Author
Posts: 249
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2019 4:14 pm

Re: 6 abreast A220 seating - Channel Airways style

Wed Jun 05, 2019 4:03 pm

tistpaa727 wrote:
Is someone taking about this....


Ah see I missed including the link to the Channel Airways 7 abreast “family style seating” Trident.

http://www.shockcone.co.uk/hs121/trident/variants.htm
Aesthetically the A 340 got it right!
 
Amiga500
Posts: 2132
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2015 8:22 am

Re: 6 abreast A220 seating - Channel Airways style

Wed Jun 05, 2019 4:07 pm

BAe 146/Avro RJ fitted in 6 across and was a smaller cross section.

Could be done, but it'd be a horrible experience for all in the cabin - and would fly in the face of Airbus' PR crap on seat width.
 
User avatar
Btblue
Posts: 692
Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2004 4:57 am

Re: 6 abreast A220 seating - Channel Airways style

Wed Jun 05, 2019 4:10 pm

I remember flying on a Bae 146 with Buzz back in the day to Rome. Six abreast seating configuration, rammed in.

Making the A220 six abreast I would imagine is possible... Time will tell.

Sent from my EVR-L29 using Tapatalk
 
KlimaBXsst
Topic Author
Posts: 249
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2019 4:14 pm

Re: 6 abreast A220 seating - Channel Airways style

Wed Jun 05, 2019 5:05 pm

Btblue wrote:
I remember flying on a Bae 146 with Buzz back in the day to Rome. Six abreast seating configuration, rammed in.

Making the A220 six abreast I would imagine is possible... Time will tell.

Sent from my EVR-L29 using Tapatalk


Yes they did configure some BAE 146’s this way in Europe... in America the airlines went 5 abreast on our 146’s.

I want to say in the US, it was Continental or National that used to have a very VERY TINY middle DC10 seat in (in the center of the 5 seats.

Martinair in Europe allegedly had a tiny “kiddie middle seat” on their DC 10s too.
Aesthetically the A 340 got it right!
 
YYZYYT
Posts: 1023
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2005 12:41 am

Re: 6 abreast A220 seating - Channel Airways style

Wed Jun 05, 2019 5:12 pm

Not sure it can be done, at least not using normal seats.

The BAe 146 was a different case, while it was configured for 5 across often it is wider than the A220. Cabin width for the BAe 146 is 3.42m, which is close to the B737 at 3.54 m (or A320 at 3.70). So it's approximately 1 inch of lost width per seat compared to the 737.

A220 cabin width is 3.28 m, which is nearly 2 inches of lost width / seat, when compared to the B737. In fact, the A220 is far closer to the DC9 cabin width of 3.11. **

If you consider that the standard 737 seat is 17.2 inches, give or take, a seat at 15+ inches would be very tight, even on a short flight (Heck, even the "dreaded A330 9-abreast" seats are 16.7 inches, and standard bus seats are 17-18 inches... ).

** (Note that all of these measurements are from wikipedia).
 
KlimaBXsst
Topic Author
Posts: 249
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2019 4:14 pm

Re: 6 abreast A220 seating - Channel Airways style

Wed Jun 05, 2019 6:07 pm

YYZYYT wrote:
Not sure it can be done, at least not using normal seats.

The BAe 146 was a different case, while it was configured for 5 across often it is wider than the A220. Cabin width for the BAe 146 is 3.42m, which is close to the B737 at 3.54 m (or A320 at 3.70). So it's approximately 1 inch of lost width per seat compared to the 737.

A220 cabin width is 3.28 m, which is nearly 2 inches of lost width / seat, when compared to the B737. In fact, the A220 is far closer to the DC9 cabin width of 3.11. **

If you consider that the standard 737 seat is 17.2 inches, give or take, a seat at 15+ inches would be very tight, even on a short flight (Heck, even the "dreaded A330 9-abreast" seats are 16.7 inches, and standard bus seats are 17-18 inches... ).

** (Note that all of these measurements are from wikipedia).


Yes the aisle and window seats would be very narrow 8 abreast 767 style or 9 abreast airbus a300 style but armrest space could be built into the back of the Kiddie 12 inch middle seats so when not occupied by a family they can always be fairly comfortable with just two fully grown people occupying that row.

I think the math comes out pretty close. Yes less than the 737 seat but not sold as anything narrower than a 737 when a non family is occupying the row.
Aesthetically the A 340 got it right!
 
KlimaBXsst
Topic Author
Posts: 249
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2019 4:14 pm

Re: 6 abreast A220 seating - Channel Airways style

Wed Jun 05, 2019 6:17 pm

Amiga500 wrote:
BAe 146/Avro RJ fitted in 6 across and was a smaller cross section.

Could be done, but it'd be a horrible experience for all in the cabin - and would fly in the face of Airbus' PR crap on seat width.


Market segmentation, at least in the US may permit a narrow “kid seat.” Time will tell.
Aesthetically the A 340 got it right!
 
kimimm19
Posts: 306
Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2013 9:34 pm

Re: 6 abreast A220 seating - Channel Airways style

Wed Jun 05, 2019 7:20 pm

I don't believe it's possible. People already complained about the nine abreast 787s and a330s. The widths talked about would be even less and I doubt, especially in America and the UK for example that many people could even sit down, let alone tolerate a few hour flight in it.
 
KlimaBXsst
Topic Author
Posts: 249
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2019 4:14 pm

Re: 6 abreast A220 seating - Channel Airways style

Wed Jun 05, 2019 9:40 pm

kimimm19 wrote:
I don't believe it's possible. People already complained about the nine abreast 787s and a330s. The widths talked about would be even less and I doubt, especially in America and the UK for example that many people could even sit down, let alone tolerate a few hour flight in it.


Cabin Width 129”

18”+12”+18”•17”•18”+12”+18”

With wiggle room on the kids seats!
Aesthetically the A 340 got it right!
 
Amiga500
Posts: 2132
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2015 8:22 am

Re: 6 abreast A220 seating - Channel Airways style

Thu Jun 06, 2019 9:25 am

KlimaBXsst wrote:
kimimm19 wrote:
I don't believe it's possible. People already complained about the nine abreast 787s and a330s. The widths talked about would be even less and I doubt, especially in America and the UK for example that many people could even sit down, let alone tolerate a few hour flight in it.


Cabin Width 129”

18”+12”+18”•17”•18”+12”+18”

With wiggle room on the kids seats!


and if the kid seat could fold down to become a mini table/armrest you have 2+2 in very comfortable surroundings.
 
VSMUT
Posts: 2696
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2016 11:40 am

Re: 6 abreast A220 seating - Channel Airways style

Thu Jun 06, 2019 12:31 pm

Btblue wrote:
I remember flying on a Bae 146 with Buzz back in the day to Rome. Six abreast seating configuration, rammed in.


You can still enjoy these. Have had the endure them on both CityJet and WDL Aviation (both on behalf of HOP!) in the past year.
 
KlimaBXsst
Topic Author
Posts: 249
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2019 4:14 pm

Re: 6 abreast A220 seating - Channel Airways style

Thu Jun 06, 2019 9:02 pm

Amiga500 wrote:
KlimaBXsst wrote:
kimimm19 wrote:
I don't believe it's possible. People already complained about the nine abreast 787s and a330s. The widths talked about would be even less and I doubt, especially in America and the UK for example that many people could even sit down, let alone tolerate a few hour flight in it.


Cabin Width 129”

18”+12”+18”•17”•18”+12”+18”

With wiggle room on the kids seats!


and if the kid seat could fold down to become a mini table/armrest you have 2+2 in very comfortable surroundings.[/quotes]


(; similar thoughts exactly.
Aesthetically the A 340 got it right!
 
IADCA
Posts: 1827
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 12:24 am

Re: 6 abreast A220 seating - Channel Airways style

Thu Jun 06, 2019 9:44 pm

KlimaBXsst wrote:
kimimm19 wrote:
I don't believe it's possible. People already complained about the nine abreast 787s and a330s. The widths talked about would be even less and I doubt, especially in America and the UK for example that many people could even sit down, let alone tolerate a few hour flight in it.


Cabin Width 129”

18”+12”+18”•17”•18”+12”+18”

With wiggle room on the kids seats!


The problem is that you could only sell that config up to a 66% LF unless you have young kids on board, as a 12" seat is useless to anyone who is anywhere near adult size. You'd basically be taking 20% of the capacity out of every flight and then hoping that people bring at least that many children, to make it break even. When was the last time you were on a flight where 1/3 of the passengers (or even 1/6) were children who could sit in a seat that small? For me, I think the answer is never.
 
KlimaBXsst
Topic Author
Posts: 249
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2019 4:14 pm

Re: 6 abreast A220 seating - Channel Airways style

Thu Jun 06, 2019 11:26 pm

IADCA wrote:
KlimaBXsst wrote:
Cabin Width 129”

18”+12”+18”•17”•18”+12”+18”

With wiggle room on the kids seats!


The problem is that you could only sell that config up to a 66% LF unless you have young kids on board, as a 12" seat is useless to anyone who is anywhere near adult size. You'd basically be taking 20% of the capacity out of every flight and then hoping that people bring at least that many children, to make it break even. When was the last time you were on a flight where 1/3 of the passengers (or even 1/6) were children who could sit in a seat that small? For me, I think the answer is never.


Well I do get your rationale but I will dispute your numbers especially considering we are not using 6 abreast with kiddie seats for the entire cabin but only aft of the exit rows or possibly even only 1/4 of the main cabin. You could also be increasing what is available to sale.

I see this more of a niche for the likes of Allegiant Frontier and Spirit or any who choose the A220 to explore.

One has to remember with the ULCC’s and the new air industry... upselling is always happening too! That kiddie seat could also benefit that coach passenger who has to buy two seat for his size, but does not necessarily need a full second seat.

That kiddie seat space could also come in handy when unoccupied for the business men who want a “more space” cabin to be able to work. Thanks for your response.
Aesthetically the A 340 got it right!
 
KlimaBXsst
Topic Author
Posts: 249
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2019 4:14 pm

Re: 6 abreast A220 seating - Channel Airways style

Fri Jun 07, 2019 4:03 am

For historical records. Channel Airways Trident Seat Map and description of Trident 1C - Trident 1E variants.

http://www.shockcone.co.uk/hs121/variants.htm
Aesthetically the A 340 got it right!
 
IADCA
Posts: 1827
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 12:24 am

Re: 6 abreast A220 seating - Channel Airways style

Fri Jun 07, 2019 2:26 pm

KlimaBXsst wrote:
IADCA wrote:
KlimaBXsst wrote:
Cabin Width 129”

18”+12”+18”•17”•18”+12”+18”

With wiggle room on the kids seats!


The problem is that you could only sell that config up to a 66% LF unless you have young kids on board, as a 12" seat is useless to anyone who is anywhere near adult size. You'd basically be taking 20% of the capacity out of every flight and then hoping that people bring at least that many children, to make it break even. When was the last time you were on a flight where 1/3 of the passengers (or even 1/6) were children who could sit in a seat that small? For me, I think the answer is never.


Well I do get your rationale but I will dispute your numbers especially considering we are not using 6 abreast with kiddie seats for the entire cabin but only aft of the exit rows or possibly even only 1/4 of the main cabin. You could also be increasing what is available to sale.

I see this more of a niche for the likes of Allegiant Frontier and Spirit or any who choose the A220 to explore.

One has to remember with the ULCC’s and the new air industry... upselling is always happening too! That kiddie seat could also benefit that coach passenger who has to buy two seat for his size, but does not necessarily need a full second seat.

That kiddie seat space could also come in handy when unoccupied for the business men who want a “more space” cabin to be able to work. Thanks for your response.


Even over just the aft cabin, the math doesn't work. Roughly (very) mocked out using half the floor area (no premium cabin up front, so note that the math for Spirit would be worse) without kids, you'd only be able to sell up to an 83% LF without small children, which isn't enough for ULCCs. And unless you charge the same price for the kid seats as regular ones, the airlines would lose a lot of revenue on transporting kids in the smaller, cheaper seats. 1/4 it might, but at that point you're talking about a high-cost, low-revenue product spread a small part of a subfleet in niche markets.

And LOL at the idea of people voluntarily buying a spillover seat for their rolls. How many of those people actually buy 2 seats at present?
 
KlimaBXsst
Topic Author
Posts: 249
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2019 4:14 pm

Re: 6 abreast A220 seating - Channel Airways style

Fri Jun 07, 2019 2:35 pm

IADCA wrote:
KlimaBXsst wrote:
IADCA wrote:

The problem is that you could only sell that config up to a 66% LF unless you have young kids on board, as a 12" seat is useless to anyone who is anywhere near adult size. You'd basically be taking 20% of the capacity out of every flight and then hoping that people bring at least that many children, to make it break even. When was the last time you were on a flight where 1/3 of the passengers (or even 1/6) were children who could sit in a seat that small? For me, I think the answer is never.


Well I do get your rationale but I will dispute your numbers especially considering we are not using 6 abreast with kiddie seats for the entire cabin but only aft of the exit rows or possibly even only 1/4 of the main cabin. You could also be increasing what is available to sale.

I see this more of a niche for the likes of Allegiant Frontier and Spirit or any who choose the A220 to explore.

One has to remember with the ULCC’s and the new air industry... upselling is always happening too! That kiddie seat could also benefit that coach passenger who has to buy two seat for his size, but does not necessarily need a full second seat.

That kiddie seat space could also come in handy when unoccupied for the business men who want a “more space” cabin to be able to work. Thanks for your response.


Even over just the aft cabin, the math doesn't work. Roughly (very) mocked out using half the floor area (no premium cabin up front, so note that the math for Spirit would be worse) without kids, you'd only be able to sell up to an 83% LF without small children, which isn't enough for ULCCs. And unless you charge the same price for the kid seats as regular ones, the airlines would lose a lot of revenue on transporting kids in the smaller, cheaper seats. 1/4 it might, but at that point you're talking about a high-cost, low-revenue product spread a small part of a subfleet in niche markets.

And LOL at the idea of people voluntarily buying a spillover seat for their rolls. How many of those people actually buy 2 seats at present?


Okay ah ha. We will see, what Is done with the Airbus A220.
Aesthetically the A 340 got it right!
 
KentB27
Posts: 476
Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2015 2:20 pm

Re: 6 abreast A220 seating - Channel Airways style

Sat Jun 08, 2019 7:33 am

KlimaBXsst wrote:
Cabin Width 129”

18”+12”+18”•17”•18”+12”+18”

With wiggle room on the kids seats!


I don't see any possible way that a 12" seat would comply with safety standards. Even for a child a 12" seat would be very narrow. Plus let's not forget about how prolific childhood obesity is becoming.
 
astuteman
Posts: 6838
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 7:50 pm

Re: 6 abreast A220 seating - Channel Airways style

Sat Jun 08, 2019 8:03 am

KlimaBXsst wrote:
kimimm19 wrote:
I don't believe it's possible. People already complained about the nine abreast 787s and a330s. The widths talked about would be even less and I doubt, especially in America and the UK for example that many people could even sit down, let alone tolerate a few hour flight in it.


Cabin Width 129”

18”+12”+18”•17”•18”+12”+18”

With wiggle room on the kids seats!


16.5" seats with 1.5" armrests sounds the most likely config - it would allow an 18" aisle


1.5"+16.5"+1.5"+16.5"+1.5"+16.5"+1.5"... +18"+..... 1.5"+16.5"+1.5"+16.5"+1.5"+16.5"+1.5" = 129"

Rgds
 
KlimaBXsst
Topic Author
Posts: 249
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2019 4:14 pm

Re: 6 abreast A220 seating - Channel Airways style

Sun Jun 09, 2019 6:51 pm

astuteman wrote:
KlimaBXsst wrote:
kimimm19 wrote:
I don't believe it's possible. People already complained about the nine abreast 787s and a330s. The widths talked about would be even less and I doubt, especially in America and the UK for example that many people could even sit down, let alone tolerate a few hour flight in it.


Cabin Width 129”

18”+12”+18”•17”•18”+12”+18”

With wiggle room on the kids seats!


16.5" seats with 1.5" armrests sounds the most likely config - it would allow an 18" aisle


1.5"+16.5"+1.5"+16.5"+1.5"+16.5"+1.5"... +18"+..... 1.5"+16.5"+1.5"+16.5"+1.5"+16.5"+1.5" = 129"

Rgds


Higher yielding ticket buyers would be quite adverse to sitting in a 16.5 seat that is why I am going with the “kiddie seat concept,”

(with wiggle room... or in other words to allow for whatever gov regs there are)

so there would never be 3 grown adults squished into a 3 16.5” seats next to one another.
Aesthetically the A 340 got it right!
 
astuteman
Posts: 6838
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 7:50 pm

Re: 6 abreast A220 seating - Channel Airways style

Sun Jun 09, 2019 7:52 pm

KlimaBXsst wrote:
astuteman wrote:
KlimaBXsst wrote:

Cabin Width 129”

18”+12”+18”•17”•18”+12”+18”

With wiggle room on the kids seats!


16.5" seats with 1.5" armrests sounds the most likely config - it would allow an 18" aisle


1.5"+16.5"+1.5"+16.5"+1.5"+16.5"+1.5"... +18"+..... 1.5"+16.5"+1.5"+16.5"+1.5"+16.5"+1.5" = 129"

Rgds


Higher yielding ticket buyers would be quite adverse to sitting in a 16.5 seat that is why I am going with the “kiddie seat concept,”

(with wiggle room... or in other words to allow for whatever gov regs there are)

so there would never be 3 grown adults squished into a 3 16.5” seats next to one another.


Can't argue. 16.5" seats and 1.5" armrests is real ULCC territory.

Rgds
 
KlimaBXsst
Topic Author
Posts: 249
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2019 4:14 pm

Re: 6 abreast A220 seating - Channel Airways style

Sun Jun 09, 2019 8:02 pm

astuteman wrote:
KlimaBXsst wrote:
astuteman wrote:

16.5" seats with 1.5" armrests sounds the most likely config - it would allow an 18" aisle


1.5"+16.5"+1.5"+16.5"+1.5"+16.5"+1.5"... +18"+..... 1.5"+16.5"+1.5"+16.5"+1.5"+16.5"+1.5" = 129"

Rgds


Higher yielding ticket buyers would be quite adverse to sitting in a 16.5 seat that is why I am going with the “kiddie seat concept,”

(with wiggle room... or in other words to allow for whatever gov regs there are)

so there would never be 3 grown adults squished into a 3 16.5” seats next to one another.


Can't argue. 16.5" seats and 1.5" armrests is real ULCC territory.

Rgds


The race to the ugly bottom should be fun to watch at the ULCCs, the B6’s and WN’s, and the US3 with regionals. The Embraer E2 and A220 are not a simple apples or oranges!

Rgds
Aesthetically the A 340 got it right!
 
Sokes
Posts: 102
Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2019 4:48 pm

Re: 6 abreast A220 seating - Channel Airways style

Thu Jun 20, 2019 7:51 pm

Five seats of 17" and one seat of 15" per row with a 17" aisle:
129" = (1.5"+17"+1.5"+17"+1.5"+17"+1.5") + 17" + (1.5"+17"+1.5"+15"+1.5"+17"+1.5")
The 15" middle seats are not sold to adults unless known to the airline to be thin. Obviously there has to be a discount on the 15" middle seat.

The 17"+15"+17" seat group can be used as follow:
-Two parents, one child
-A thin parent with child and a thin adult next to the aisle. The child will probably grab the window seat.
-An overweight parent with child and one adult on the window. If the plane is not full, one overweight parent with one child gets the row for itself. Otherwise
children of overweight parents will never have a window seat.
-A very overweight person and a frequent flyer/ person who paid high ticket price.
-Three thin adults

If there are unoccupied 15" middle seats left the two outer seats could be given to frequent flyers or those with high ticket prices. Selling them might be problematic, if very overweight people don't have to pay.

When I was 22 I was seated in an overnight bus next to a very overweight person. That guy needed so much place I repeatedly woke up. I fell in deep sleep in the morning. When I woke up the bus was already in the bus stand, all people had left the bus and my hand luggage including passport and camera was stolen.
The irony of the story is that today I'm overweight myself.
The system described above is complicated, but may lead to good customer satisfaction and increase the attractiveness of 5 abreast premium economy.

I think 15" is o.k. for price conscious thin people.
Why can't the world be a little bit more autistic?
 
YYZYYT
Posts: 1023
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2005 12:41 am

Re: 6 abreast A220 seating - Channel Airways style

Thu Jun 20, 2019 8:46 pm

Sokes wrote:
Five seats of 17" and one seat of 15" per row with a 17" aisle:
129" = (1.5"+17"+1.5"+17"+1.5"+17"+1.5") + 17" + (1.5"+17"+1.5"+15"+1.5"+17"+1.5")
The 15" middle seats are not sold to adults unless known to the airline to be thin. Obviously there has to be a discount on the 15" middle seat.

The 17"+15"+17" seat group can be used as follow:
-Two parents, one child
-A thin parent with child and a thin adult next to the aisle. The child will probably grab the window seat.
-An overweight parent with child and one adult on the window. If the plane is not full, one overweight parent with one child gets the row for itself. Otherwise
children of overweight parents will never have a window seat.
-A very overweight person and a frequent flyer/ person who paid high ticket price.
-Three thin adults

If there are unoccupied 15" middle seats left the two outer seats could be given to frequent flyers or those with high ticket prices. Selling them might be problematic, if very overweight people don't have to pay.

When I was 22 I was seated in an overnight bus next to a very overweight person. That guy needed so much place I repeatedly woke up. I fell in deep sleep in the morning. When I woke up the bus was already in the bus stand, all people had left the bus and my hand luggage including passport and camera was stolen.
The irony of the story is that today I'm overweight myself.
The system described above is complicated, but may lead to good customer satisfaction and increase the attractiveness of 5 abreast premium economy.

I think 15" is o.k. for price conscious thin people.


And check-in staff will then be looking passengers up and down and telling them that they are - or or not - "thin"... I'd love to see how that plays out in social media. (especially if United buys it)
 
Sokes
Posts: 102
Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2019 4:48 pm

Re: 6 abreast A220 seating - Channel Airways style

Thu Jun 20, 2019 9:13 pm

Change of mind:
The 15" seat should be on the window.
Recently I travelled with my 10 year old son. I, my son and another overweight person sat together. My son is hypersensitive to smell and refused to sit in the middle. One shouldn't assume that children are willing to sit in the middle.

The 17"+17"+15" seat group can be used as follow:
-Two parents, one child
-A parent with child and an overweight adult next to the aisle. Parent and child can decide how they want to sit.
-If the plane is not full: A very overweight person on the aisle and any adult on the window. 15" is a lot, rather 1.5" armrest is not enough. But if the middle seat is
free. it's o.k.
-Three thin adults. The thin adult who takes the 15" window seat gets a voucher or some other bonus. To further increase attractiveness of the 15" seat, the seat next to it is given to another slim person.

If there are unoccupied middle seats left the two outer seats could be given to frequent flyers or those with high ticket prices. I assume frequent flyers prefer 15" with free middle seat. If not, they can always insist on a regular seat.
Why can't the world be a little bit more autistic?
 
Sokes
Posts: 102
Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2019 4:48 pm

Re: 6 abreast A220 seating - Channel Airways style

Fri Jun 21, 2019 6:21 am

YYZYYT wrote:
Sokes wrote:
Five seats of 17" and one seat of 15" per row with a 17" aisle:
129" = (1.5"+17"+1.5"+17"+1.5"+17"+1.5") + 17" + (1.5"+17"+1.5"+15"+1.5"+17"+1.5")
The 15" middle seats are not sold to adults unless known to the airline to be thin. Obviously there has to be a discount on the 15" middle seat.

The 17"+15"+17" seat group can be used as follow:
-Two parents, one child
-A thin parent with child and a thin adult next to the aisle. The child will probably grab the window seat.
-An overweight parent with child and one adult on the window. If the plane is not full, one overweight parent with one child gets the row for itself. Otherwise
children of overweight parents will never have a window seat.
-A very overweight person and a frequent flyer/ person who paid high ticket price.
-Three thin adults

If there are unoccupied 15" middle seats left the two outer seats could be given to frequent flyers or those with high ticket prices. Selling them might be problematic, if very overweight people don't have to pay.

When I was 22 I was seated in an overnight bus next to a very overweight person. That guy needed so much place I repeatedly woke up. I fell in deep sleep in the morning. When I woke up the bus was already in the bus stand, all people had left the bus and my hand luggage including passport and camera was stolen.
The irony of the story is that today I'm overweight myself.
The system described above is complicated, but may lead to good customer satisfaction and increase the attractiveness of 5 abreast premium economy.

I think 15" is o.k. for price conscious thin people.


And check-in staff will then be looking passengers up and down and telling them that they are - or or not - "thin"... I'd love to see how that plays out in social media. (especially if United buys it)


Do you know the movie "As good as it gets"?
Two neurological normal people sit in the car and generalise how hard live is. Jack Nicholson is the third person in the car. He plays a character whose live is highly affected by his neurotic symptoms. But he has insight that generalisations about "live is hard" are nonsense and argues that there are plenty of people whose live is good. The two neurological normal people are of course not convinced by evidence and consider his remarks annoying.
The interesting part here is that a highly neurotic person may (or may not) have far better insight in his/ her emotions than many normal people.

People with psychosis don't have insight. People with personality disorder may have insight in their problem with others, but no insight how far that's their fault.
I have a friend whom I considered a righteous person when 25 years old. I think he has manic problems now. He thinks no end of himself, stopped an old friendship to his formerly best friend and is repeatedly hurting me. No insight. But these hard cases are only the tip of the ice berg.
So yes, I should leave Utopia and come back to earth.
I don't understand your joke about United.
Why can't the world be a little bit more autistic?
 
YYZYYT
Posts: 1023
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2005 12:41 am

Re: 6 abreast A220 seating - Channel Airways style

Fri Jun 21, 2019 1:29 pm

Sokes wrote:
I don't understand your joke about United.



I was referring to the fact that United in particular seems to be a lightning rod for "United did this to me..." stories in the media, in particular since the Dr. Dao incident.

And I don't think your idea reaches the level of "psychosis", lol. I was only giving my opinion that it's impractical - a seat earmarked for "thin" or "young" or "next to overweight" passengers is going to cause no end of trouble.
 
Sokes
Posts: 102
Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2019 4:48 pm

Re: 6 abreast A220 seating - Channel Airways style

Fri Jun 21, 2019 4:47 pm

YYZYYT wrote:
Sokes wrote:
I don't understand your joke about United.



I was referring to the fact that United in particular seems to be a lightning rod for "United did this to me..." stories in the media, in particular since the Dr. Dao incident.

And I don't think your idea reaches the level of "psychosis", lol. I was only giving my opinion that it's impractical - a seat earmarked for "thin" or "young" or "next to overweight" passengers is going to cause no end of trouble.

I didn't mean to say my idea was psychotic. I meant to say that one can't make a logical system which profits all, as people get upset and can't control their emotions. E.g. the person who issues me the ticket considers me overweight, simply because I am. I should be happy not to be forced to pay for a broader seat, instead I get upset. I can't control my emotions, simply as I'm lacking insight that the person who issues the ticket is trying to help, not trying to insult.
A lack of insight is most marked with psychotics. But to a degree more or less we all lack insight in one area or another. So no use to try to find a logical system which you rightly describe as impractical.
Why can't the world be a little bit more autistic?
 
teachpdx
Posts: 109
Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2017 1:51 am

Re: 6 abreast A220 seating - Channel Airways style

Fri Jun 21, 2019 10:34 pm

There is absolutely no need for the A220 to go six abreast for ULCC. It's perfectly situated for ULCC with only 5 abreast.
1. The A220-300 can already seat up to 160 in a high-density configuration with an additional overwing exit. This gives 8-10 seats with additional legroom at the exit, which is a good ratio for ULCC operations.
2. At 160, that's only 26 less than the typical ULCC A320. If an A320 seats 16% more passengers but the A220 is ~20% more efficient, a five-abreast A220 is theoretically comparable to the A320.
3. Using five similar seats instead of the 1" wider middle seat will widen the aisle, making boarding faster and decreasing turn times. It will also decrease costs due to commonality.
4. A narrower "child" seat would do nothing but increase staff workload during check-in and boarding, and would eliminate the ability to do everything online. This would increase staffing costs considerably.
5. More money could be charged for seat reservations for the 2-abreast side.

We should add this topic to the long list of implausibilities, like passenger bunks above the cabin ceiling, standing seats, staggered economy seats, etc.

The sweet spot for ULCC ops for the A220-300 is 150 pax... keep the 4th FA at home, start with 34" pitch at the front and squeeze down to 28" at the back. Make the seat reservation fees next to nothing in the back, and progressively higher forward. Charge more for the 2-abreast seats and call them "premium" or something. And heavily promote having "the widest seats of any ULCC". This would be a money-making machine for F9 or NK or even SY.
Up Next: DL PDX-ATL-TPA | DL TPA-SLC-PDX | DI SEA-LGW | AF CDG-PRG | OK PRG-CPH | D8 CPH-LGW | DI LGW-SEA
 
Sokes
Posts: 102
Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2019 4:48 pm

Re: 6 abreast A220 seating - Channel Airways style

Sat Jun 22, 2019 6:53 am

teachpdx wrote:
...
4. A narrower "child" seat would do nothing but increase staff workload during check-in and boarding, and would eliminate the ability to do everything online. This would increase staffing costs considerably.
...

Good point.
Why can't the world be a little bit more autistic?
 
tommy1808
Posts: 10413
Joined: Thu Nov 21, 2013 3:24 pm

Re: 6 abreast A220 seating - Channel Airways style

Sat Jun 22, 2019 10:33 am

teachpdx wrote:
The sweet spot for ULCC ops for the A220-300 is 150 pax... keep the 4th FA at home,


4th FA pays itself with more on board sales revenue, going over 200pax is iffy. That is why you see 156 seat LCC A319.

Best regards
Thomas
This Singature is a safe space......
 
User avatar
keesje
Posts: 12932
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2001 2:08 am

Re: 6 abreast A220 seating - Channel Airways style

Sun Jun 23, 2019 12:06 pm

I looked at staggered 6 abreast a while ago, to make it a 150 seater, when the A220-300 was named still C130.

https://s191.photobucket.com/user/keesje_pics/media/CSeriesC130150seater.jpg.html?t=1217779572
"Never mistake motion for action." Ernest Hemingway

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: winstonavgeek and 9 guests

Popular Searches On Airliners.net

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos