Moderators: richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR

 
doulasc
Topic Author
Posts: 873
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2011 5:12 pm

AA and UA Douglas DC-7s

Sun Oct 25, 2020 3:07 am

What year did American and United retire their Douglas DC-7s from passenger service and kept a few but were converted to cargo use
into the mid 1960s.They kept their DC-6s for shorter routes until the Boeing 737 and BAC 111 came in the late 1960s.Delta kept their
DC-7s til 1968.
 
aaway
Posts: 1452
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 2:07 am

Re: AA and UA Douglas DC-7s

Sun Oct 25, 2020 7:14 am

AA - 1963. UA - I believe 1964.
"The greatest mistake you can make in life is to continually be afraid you will make one." - Elbert Hubbard
 
SFOThinker
Posts: 163
Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2014 4:13 pm

Re: AA and UA Douglas DC-7s

Sun Oct 25, 2020 3:54 pm

I’ve always been amazed at the speed with which the DC 7s and L-1649 propeller airliners were withdrawn from service when jets came in. Did AA, UA, and TWA make any money on them? I realize they were fiercely competitive on coast to coast routes and to Europe (for TWA) but I wonder how quickly they were allowed to depreciate them and if they had to take a write off when they were retired?
My understanding is that the engines were difficult and expensive to maintain, which is why DC 6s and L-1011 planes were used longer. Pushing reciprocating engines to the limits for high performance came at a price.
I know that DL and NW flew them longer than UA and AA. I don’t know how long EA flew their DC 7Bs.
 
TW870
Posts: 1249
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2013 2:01 am

Re: AA and UA Douglas DC-7s

Sun Oct 25, 2020 6:26 pm

SFOThinker wrote:
I’ve always been amazed at the speed with which the DC 7s and L-1649 propeller airliners were withdrawn from service when jets came in. Did AA, UA, and TWA make any money on them? I realize they were fiercely competitive on coast to coast routes and to Europe (for TWA) but I wonder how quickly they were allowed to depreciate them and if they had to take a write off when they were retired?
My understanding is that the engines were difficult and expensive to maintain, which is why DC 6s and L-1011 planes were used longer. Pushing reciprocating engines to the limits for high performance came at a price.
I know that DL and NW flew them longer than UA and AA. I don’t know how long EA flew their DC 7Bs.


You are absolutely correct that the DC-7s as well as the L-1049C/G/H and L-1649 were retired early because of engine reliability problems. The way I think about it is that there was no easy way to squeeze over 3,000 horsepower out of a radial engine. The two bad options were either turbocharging, which Wright did with the R-3350 for the DC-7s and Super Constellations, or adding more rows of cylinders, which Pratt&Whitney did with the R-4360 for the Stratocruiser. Both options gave the engines bad thermal dynamics. They both ran so hot that they were prone to inflight shutdowns and cracked cylinders. The reason the airlines needed the power, though, is that it was the only way to give an airplane as heavy as a DC-7 or a Super Connie transcontinental/transatlantic range. The R-2800 on the DC-6 was far more reliable, but at only 2,500hp, you were just too payload and range limited. So for five years starting in 1953, the solution was to turbocharge the Wright R-3350 and limp along until the jets came in in 1958. Once that happened, the jets took over all the long range flying, and you could relegate the remaining piston fleet to short haul. You no longer needed the extra horsepower on short haul, so you could retire the less reliable planes. Thus, United ended piston operations with the DC-6, and TWA with the non-turbo L-749A. Northwest did run the DC-7C until 1967, but that was because they could use the extra horsepower to lift more freight on their transpacific freight ops for a short window before they had enough 707 lift to retire the pistons altogether.
 
doulasc
Topic Author
Posts: 873
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2011 5:12 pm

Re: AA and UA Douglas DC-7s

Sun Oct 25, 2020 10:10 pm

SFOThinker wrote:
I’ve always been amazed at the speed with which the DC 7s and L-1649 propeller airliners were withdrawn from service when jets came in. Did AA, UA, and TWA make any money on them? I realize they were fiercely competitive on coast to coast routes and to Europe (for TWA) but I wonder how quickly they were allowed to depreciate them and if they had to take a write off when they were retired?
My understanding is that the engines were difficult and expensive to maintain, which is why DC 6s and L-1011 planes were used longer. Pushing reciprocating engines to the limits for high performance came at a price.
I know that DL and NW flew them longer than UA and AA. I don’t know how long EA flew their DC 7Bs.

Eastern retired their DC-7Bs in 1966 There is a restored one stranded in Charlotte NC due to engine failure who knows if it will fly again.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: pvcf64 and 11 guests

Popular Searches On Airliners.net

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos