Moderators: richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
AirbusCheerlead wrote:Well, to stay close to current events, continue to help install Taliban like governments in as many Muslim countries as possible by promoting an Islam that seems, to most westerners (me included), as backwards as a return to the middle ages.
Best regards and stay safe,
Jonas
PatrickZ80 wrote:I don't think there's much they can do, they've set an unreachable goal which they're never going to make.
Saudi Arabia is known to be one of the most conservative countries in the world, if not the most conservative. Very strict Muslim laws, religious police to enforce that everyone follows those laws, etc. Not exactly appealing to foreign tourists, who desire freedom. Saudi Arabia lacks freedom. Women rights are not respected, for example women are not allowed to drive a car.
On top of that, there's nothing really appealing to Saudi Arabia which for the most part is just a big desert. Sure they got Mecca, however that's limited to Muslims only. It doesn't appeal to western tourists. Personally, I would never even think about Saudi Arabia when deciding where to spend my next holiday.
The 17.5 million tourists that they did get are mostly Hajj tourists, Muslims visiting Mecca. And while they're there anyway, they might as well take a look at the rest of the country. I don't suppose Muslims have a problem with the strict Muslim laws in Saudi Arabia, but to attract western tourists the country will need to loosen up. Those Muslim laws are really a problem, they are the reason non-Muslims won't go there. Saudi Arabia can be satisfied with the amount of tourism it currently has, that's the maximum achievable.
airlinenavigato wrote:Western tourists may have more rights than the population. I remember they wanted to create a town for tourists with a more Western culture.
airlinenavigato wrote:Western tourism may bring liberal thinking inside the country to make it a more free country
airlinenavigato wrote:
Western tourists may have more rights than the population. I remember they wanted to create a town for tourists with a more Western culture.
These are my thoughts:
- develop the tourism on the Red Sea. So it's at least as good as in Egypt. In winter the air and water is warmer than in Egypt.
- create accommodations for all budget ranges. From hostels to luxury hotels
- Letting (U)LCCs in by dropping airport charges. To Riyad FR and W6 can do their 6 hour flights up to Italy, Poland, Berlin and Southern Germany. To the north eastern Saudi Arabian coast to London and whole France and Germany. FlyArystan can bring tourists from Kazakhstan.
- make it visa-free for citizens of developped countries
- letting Western tourists a big share of their personal freedom
airlinenavigato wrote:On the Red Sea coast there are air tempatures from December to February of 32⁰C! And the water has 25⁰C. A totally unused potential for freezing sun and heat seeking Europeans. Just 5-6 hour flying away.
These winter temperatures don't have Egypt, Morocco, Tunisia, Aqaba and Eilat. Maybe the former Western Sahara region of Morocco. But the touristic development of that area is another topic.
SFOThinker wrote:Is the ban on non-Muslins visiting Mecca based on scripture, or is it a decision of the Saudi Kingdom? If the latter, then it could change, and many people, including me, would be interested in a visit.
eta unknown wrote:try convincing your wife to wear a burkini on the beach.
GalaxyFlyer wrote:I can’t imagine any reason to visit KSA, even without the whole Muslim thing. Been there, got the magnet. Beirut I liked but it’s gone to hell in a handcart. Dubai was interesting, I’d go back but not on my dime. Israel was great, but you’d expect that. Cairo interesting, but El Alamein for a long weekend was good—nice beach, great weather, and nice resorts under development. There’s a hundred places higher up on my bucket list.
Aaron747 wrote:GalaxyFlyer wrote:I can’t imagine any reason to visit KSA, even without the whole Muslim thing. Been there, got the magnet. Beirut I liked but it’s gone to hell in a handcart. Dubai was interesting, I’d go back but not on my dime. Israel was great, but you’d expect that. Cairo interesting, but El Alamein for a long weekend was good—nice beach, great weather, and nice resorts under development. There’s a hundred places higher up on my bucket list.
Not to mention for North Americans in particular, if you want deserts with beaches, Baja is much closer than KSA and far more friendly. And it’s not all about Cabo...La Paz is one of the most beautiful beach towns on the continent.
GalaxyFlyer wrote:I can’t imagine any reason to visit KSA, even without the whole Muslim thing. Been there, got the magnet. Beirut I liked but it’s gone to hell in a handcart. Dubai was interesting, I’d go back but not on my dime. Israel was great, but you’d expect that. Cairo interesting, but El Alamein for a long weekend was good—nice beach, great weather, and nice resorts under development. There’s a hundred places higher up on my bucket list.
stl07 wrote:GalaxyFlyer wrote:I can’t imagine any reason to visit KSA, even without the whole Muslim thing. Been there, got the magnet. Beirut I liked but it’s gone to hell in a handcart. Dubai was interesting, I’d go back but not on my dime. Israel was great, but you’d expect that. Cairo interesting, but El Alamein for a long weekend was good—nice beach, great weather, and nice resorts under development. There’s a hundred places higher up on my bucket list.
I can't imagine any reason to go to KSA, especially when Jordan is right there. Their airline allows for free stopovers on your way to other places in Europe/Levant/ME, the country has fairly western laws, there is very interesting history with Petra and you also get the dead sea and the red sea. Plus your wife doesn't have to wear any coverings should she choose not to. And she can take over for me if I get tired of driving or had too much to drink, yet another thing you can't do in KSA.