Since up until 2014, you could have flown on a DC-9-50 and up till 2011 you could fly DC-9-30s/40s with ease, that makes my list seem all the more pathetic.

DL MD-88
DL MD-90
Moderators: richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
Boeing757100 wrote:We've basically only getting these threads for the classic Boeing planes we all know and love but why not go out on a limb and do Mcdonnell Douglas!
Since up until 2014, you could have flown on a DC-9-50 and up till 2011 you could fly DC-9-30s/40s with ease, that makes my list seem all the more pathetic.![]()
DL MD-88
DL MD-90
pwm2txlhopper wrote:I don’t consider the MD-80s, -90, or the 717 a derivative of the DC-9. I’ve flown on many of those, too.
Yflyer wrote:MD-83: Alaska
MD-88: Delta
MD-90: Delta
717: Hawiianpwm2txlhopper wrote:I don’t consider the MD-80s, -90, or the 717 a derivative of the DC-9. I’ve flown on many of those, too.
A
I'm my opinion, if we're going to count the 737 Jurassic, Classic, NG, and Max as one family, then the DC-9, MD-80, 90, and 717 should be treated the same way.
ElroyJetson wrote:I've flown on the DC-9-10, DC-9-30, DC-9-50, and possibly the 20 and 40. Also the MD-81, MD-82, MD-88, and 717. Mostly DL, NW, and EA.
BoeingERJ1000 wrote:Spanair, SAS, and American MD-80's. Not sure which variant, though I'm pretty sure that the AA flight I took was on an MD-82.